The latest in a string of visits by opposition party politicians to China is slated for tomorrow when Taipei's deputy mayor, city councilors and a KMT lawmaker embark on a trip to Shanghai.
Unlike previous trips, however, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) this time has laid down a series of ground rules, dubbed the "Eight No's."
Among other things, the MAC is urging such visitors to not have any contact with China's central government, keep a low profile during their visit, refrain from signing any pacts and keep activities with government officials out in the open.
While it lacks the authority to punish those who violate the ground rules, the government's hardline approach highlights a growing concern that too many visits by public representatives could undermine its approach to cross-strait relations, political analysts said yesterday.
"The frequent visits to China recently by local government officials and lawmakers, though in a private capacity, have brought increased pressure on authorities to seek effective solutions concerning cross-strait issues," said Philip Yang (
"It is obvious that by announcing these eight restrictions, the government intends to specifically regulate the do's and don'ts of these types of trips to China, and in doing so makes clear that the central government should be the real decision-maker on most issues."
The group will stay in Shanghai for six days to attend a forum on urban planning, which is co-sponsored by Taipei's Formosa Vitality Foundation (
Taipei Deputy Mayor Bai Hsiu-hsiung (白秀雄), a member of the group, promised to abide by the regulations during a press conference at the legislature yesterday, but urged the government to relax its highly constraining cross-strait policies.
"[Bai's appeal] is indicative of the differing views on cross-strait policies between the central and local governments," Yang said. "I don't think the ruling DPP should be too worried about these exchanges because [they] seem to be inevitable within the current political atmosphere; and to some extent, these contacts may facilitate in easing tensions between the two sides."
However, Hsu Szu-chien (徐斯儉), who specializes in Chinese politics at National Chengchi University's Institute of International Relations, warned that the government must be cautious when considering a relaxation of its cross-strait policies, given Taiwan's vulnerability in its relations with China.
"It is appropriate for local governments, opposition parties and the private sector to voice their opinions and push for a relaxation of regulations. But the government has to be very careful because any change in policy will affect the collective interests of the country," Hsu said.
The government has good reason to worry. Just a few weeks ago a KMT lawmaker from Matsu, Tsao Erh-chung (
The government has considered punishing Tsao or local officials in Matsu, but have yet to make a final decision on the matter.
To avoid such surprises in the future, a more thorough review process for trips is needed, Hsu said.
"Before any trip to China [organized by local governments], more comprehensive talks between the MAC and the visiting groups must be undertaken in order to prevent agreements from being made that might undermine Taiwan's sovereignty. It is essential that the government listen to public opinion because it does, after all, represent the public's interests."
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS