Following a day of silence, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday issued a statement challenging Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) definition of the so-called “1992 consensus,” saying that the “one country, two systems” framework is not part of the consensus.
“Xi’s remarks about a Taiwan version of the ‘one country, two systems’ model is not part of the content espoused by the ‘1992 consensus.’ Given that both sides of the Taiwan Strait are governed by separate governments, the ‘one country, two systems’ model unfortunately would not receive the support of the majority of Taiwanese,” the statement said.
Reiterating its definition of the “1992 consensus,” the KMT said that it was reached by the Straits Exchange Foundation and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits after they were authorized in November 1992 to engage in negotiations on the matter.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
In essence, the “1992 consensus” means that both sides of the Taiwan Strait adhere to the “one China” principle, but are allowed to have their own interpretations of what “China” means, it said.
“The ‘1992 consensus’ not only reflects the nature of cross-strait relations, which is seeking common ground while respecting differences, but also underlines the objective reality [of the ties] and conforms to both sides’ regulations,” the KMT said.
The statement came after Xi on Wednesday included “national unification” as part of his definition of the “1992 consensus” in a speech in Beijing to mark the 40th anniversary of the 1979 “Message to Compatriots in Taiwan,” which called for the unification of “China,” an end to military confrontation across the Taiwan Strait and expanded cross-strait interactions.
Xi also announced a plan to explore a Taiwan version of the “one country, two systems” model to achieve his goal of peaceful unification.
The Chinese leader’s definition of the “1992 consensus” stands in stark contrast to that provided over the years by the KMT, which has maintained that it allows room for Taiwan to interpret “China” as being the Republic of China (ROC).
The KMT’s Mainland Affairs Department on Wednesday held a meeting to discuss Xi’s speech, KMT Culture and Communications Committee acting director-general Tang Te-ming (唐德明) said.
In its statement, the KMT also reiterated its “unwavering opposition” to Taiwanese independence, saying that the ROC is already an independent sovereign state according to its Constitution.
“Cross-strait interactions and development must continue to move forward peacefully, because it is the hope of the public that both sides can expand and deepen their exchanges,” the KMT said, adding that the party, its caucus and local government leaders all look forward to making concerted efforts to ensure the peaceful development of cross-strait relations and a win-win situation for both sides.
Conflict with Taiwan could leave China with “massive economic disruption, catastrophic military losses, significant social unrest, and devastating sanctions,” a US think tank said in a report released on Monday. The German Marshall Fund released a report titled If China Attacks Taiwan: The Consequences for China of “Minor Conflict” and “Major War” Scenarios. The report details the “massive” economic, military, social and international costs to China in the event of a minor conflict or major war with Taiwan, estimating that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could sustain losses of more than half of its active-duty ground forces, including 100,000 troops. Understanding Chinese
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday said it is closely monitoring developments in Venezuela, and would continue to cooperate with democratic allies and work together for regional and global security, stability, and prosperity. The remarks came after the US on Saturday launched a series of airstrikes in Venezuela and kidnapped Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, who was later flown to New York along with his wife. The pair face US charges related to drug trafficking and alleged cooperation with gangs designated as terrorist organizations. Maduro has denied the allegations. The ministry said that it is closely monitoring the political and economic situation
UNRELENTING: China attempted cyberattacks on Taiwan’s critical infrastructure 2.63 million times per day last year, up from 1.23 million in 2023, the NSB said China’s cyberarmy has long engaged in cyberattacks against Taiwan’s critical infrastructure, employing diverse and evolving tactics, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said yesterday, adding that cyberattacks on critical energy infrastructure last year increased 10-fold compared with the previous year. The NSB yesterday released a report titled Analysis on China’s Cyber Threats to Taiwan’s Critical Infrastructure in 2025, outlining the number of cyberattacks, major tactics and hacker groups. Taiwan’s national intelligence community identified a large number of cybersecurity incidents last year, the bureau said in a statement. China’s cyberarmy last year launched an average of 2.63 million intrusion attempts per day targeting Taiwan’s critical
‘SLICING METHOD’: In the event of a blockade, the China Coast Guard would intercept Taiwanese ships while its navy would seek to deter foreign intervention China’s military drills around Taiwan this week signaled potential strategies to cut the nation off from energy supplies and foreign military assistance, a US think tank report said. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) conducted what it called “Justice Mission 2025” exercises from Monday to Tuesday in five maritime zones and airspace around Taiwan, calling them a warning to “Taiwanese independence” forces. In a report released on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War said the exercises effectively simulated blocking shipping routes to major port cities, including Kaohsiung, Keelung and Hualien. Taiwan would be highly vulnerable under such a blockade, because it