The Taiwan High Court on Monday filed a request for a constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices on desecration of the flag, saying the Criminal Code penalizing such actions might infringe on freedom of speech, freedom of thought and proportionality.
The request was prompted by the case of independence advocates Chen Yi-ting (陳儀庭), Chen Miao-ting (陳妙婷) and three others, whose conviction for cutting up a dozen flags in 2015 was overturned on appeal by the New Taipei City District Court.
New Taipei City prosecutors appealed the overturned conviction.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
High Court judges Chou Ying-wen (周盈文), Lin Meng-huang (林孟皇) and Lin Hai-hsiang (林海祥) decided to suspend the appeal trial to allow time for a constitutional interpretation.
The Criminal Code’s prohibition of purposeful and public vandalism of the flag under Article 160 could be an infringement on the right to free speech and thought that is stipulated by Article 11 of the Constitution, the judges said.
The penalty of less than one year in prison might also clash with the principle of proportionality guaranteed by Article 23 of the Constitution, they said.
Although the flag should be honored as the nation’s symbol, its meaning to each citizen might vary and the spirit of liberty, equality and fraternity is better preserved via the toleration of dissent, not its punishment, they said.
On Oct. 10, 2015, the two Chens and three other members of the Taiwan Nationalist Party cut up flags that were displayed along Zhongzheng Bridge (中正橋) in New Taipei City. There were arrested and in their first trial were sentenced to 20 days imprisonment, commutable to a NT$20,000 fine.
The two Chens and fellow defendant Wu Hsin-en (吳馨恩) appealed the conviction, arguing that their action was a legitimate form of expression and damaging the flag was an expression of criticism on the Republic of China’s colonial repression of Taiwanese.
The New Taipei City District Court ruled in the defendants’ favor at the retrial, adding that political speech should be afforded the highest level of constitutional protection, prompting the prosecutors to appeal to the High Court.
Chen Yi-ting on Monday said that decriminalizing flag desecration would allow activists more freedom to criticize the political order.
National Taiwan University professor of law Chen Chih-lung (陳志龍) said that desecrating the flag was made a crime under the Republic of China’s Criminal Code during the 1930s due to the influence on China of Nazi Germany and other fascist states.
Most Western countries have decriminalized flag burning and other forms of protest targeting the national flag, he said.
Protesters who vandalize the flag do not cause real harm or damage and their actions are often motivated by deep and sincerely held convictions, which should be protected as a matter of conscience, he said.
“The Taiwan High Court did not need to suspend the trial or file for a constitutional interpretation, because it is already empowered to rule out the applicability of the Criminal Code to this case,” the professor said.
National Chengchi University associate professor of law Bruce Liao (廖元豪) said the US Supreme Court had struck down state laws penalizing flag desecration as violating free speech in the case Johnson v Texas.
For this reason, he would like to see the Council of Grand Justices rule on the issue, Liao said.
Charging protesters with damaging public property to the actual cash value of the flag would be more appropriate recompense for their actions, he added.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from