A week ago, the White House said that ordering a US aircraft carrier into the Sea of Japan would send a powerful deterrent to North Korea and give US President Donald Trump more options in responding to the North’s provocative behavior.
“We’re sending an armada,” Trump told Fox News that afternoon.
The problem was that the carrier, the USS Carl Vinson, and the three other warships in its strike force were that very moment sailing in the opposite direction, to take part in joint exercises with the Australian navy in the Indian Ocean, 5,600km southwest of the Korean Peninsula.
Photo: Reuters
White House officials on Tuesday said that they had been relying on guidance from the US Department of Defense.
Defense officials described a glitch-ridden sequence of events, from an ill-timed announcement of the deployment by the military’s Pacific Command to an erroneous explanation by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis — all of which perpetuated the false narrative that a flotilla was racing toward North Korea.
By the time the White House was asked about the Carl Vinson, its imminent arrival had been emblazoned on front pages across East Asia, fanning fears that Trump was considering a pre-emptive military strike.
It was portrayed as further evidence of the president’s muscular style days after he ordered a missile strike on Syria while he and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were chatting over dessert during a meeting in Florida.
With Trump himself playing up the show of force, rolling back the story became difficult, Pentagon officials said.
The saga of the wayward carrier might never have come to light had the US Navy not posted a photograph online on Monday of the Carl Vinson sailing south through the Sunda Strait, which separates the Indonesian islands of Java and Sumatra.
It was taken on Saturday, four days after White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer described its mission in the Sea of Japan.
Now, the Carl Vinson is finally on a course for the Korean Peninsula, expected to arrive in the region next week, defense officials said.
White House officials declined to comment on the confusion, referring all questions to the Pentagon.
“Sean discussed it once when asked and it was all about process,” spokesman Michael Short said of Spicer.
However, privately other officials expressed bewilderment that the Pentagon did not correct its time line, particularly given the tensions in the region and the fact that Spicer, as well as US National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, were publicly answering questions about it.
The miscues began on April 9 when the public affairs office of the Navy’s 3rd Fleet issued a news release saying that Admiral Harry Harris Jr, the Pacific commander, had ordered the Carl Vinson, a Nimitz-class nuclear-powered carrier, and its strike force — two destroyers and one cruiser — to leave Singapore and sail to the Western Pacific. As is customary, the US Navy did not say exactly where the carrier force was headed or its precise mission.
Given the timing, it hardly needed to: Trump had just wrapped up a two-day summit with Xi at the Mar-a-Lago resort with a message that the US had run out of patience with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, and its nuclear and missile programs.
That Sunday, McMaster told Fox News that the deployment was a “prudent” move, designed to give the US president “a full range of options to remove” the threat posed by Kim.
What the Navy did not say was that the Carl Vinson had to carry out another mission before it could set sail north — a long-scheduled joint exercise with the Australian navy in the Indian Ocean.
The photograph that the US Navy posted of the Carl Vinson, bristling with fighter jets as it passed Indonesia, was spotted by Defense News, which broke the news that the ship was thousands of kilometers away from where the world thought it was.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from