A controversial underground railway project in Tainan was approved yesterday, despite protests from residents, land rights advocates and environmentalists.
The Ministry of the Interior’s Construction and Planning Agency approved the project in a review after hours of debates about the necessity of property expropriation, residents’ rights and groundwater levels at the proposed construction site.
The project is to see 8.23km of railway tracks laid 30m underground in Tainan’s Yongkang District (永康), but would involve land expropriations, which sparked a series of protests.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
Although the project has yet to be approved by a land expropriation committee, the Urban Planning Commission’s approval is interpreted as a definite “green light,” following a series of reviews that began in 2009.
Dozens of Tainan residents crowded the conference room, but when invited to speak, they stood silently and held up placards expressing their helplessness as the session ended.
National Chengchi University professor Hsu Shih-jung (徐世榮) said residents heard rumors that the project would be approved, so they decided not to protest and to make the review the “quietest and smoothest review” in the ministry’s history.
“There are no major flaws in terms of the project’s justifiability,” Deputy Minister of the Interior Hua Ching-chun (花敬群) said at a news conference after the review.
“There will be no forced relocations. Local residents’ rights to housing will be protected 100 percent. Housing will be provided for people whose property is expropriated and they will be able to purchase apartments from the Tainan City Government at 50 percent of market value,” Hua said, adding that 17 percent of residents living close to the project would have to relocate because most of their properties would be expropriated.
Hsu, who read 10 books about land rights and legal expropriation procedures in front of the Executive Yuan for 24 hours from Monday to yesterday in a protest against the project, said he was disappointed, even though the approval came as no surprise.
The lack of communication between the city government and residents was contrary to Hua’s statement that the railway project was justifiable and in the public’s interest, Hsu said.
“We did not have any meaningful conversation with the city government or the commission. Although we were allowed to speak at the reviews, the city did not respond to our questions or suggestions,” he said.
Hua said the ministry rejected Hsu’s request to call hearings to guarantee procedural justice on proposed land appropriations, because the hearing did not have a definite legal significance and officials were not legally obliged to answer advocates’ inquiries.
“Hua’s statement was completely in line with what the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration would have said. There is indeed legal basis to hold hearings, but the ministry is simply unwilling to do so,” Hsu said.
Residents and activists will take legal action to seek “administrative relief” if the ministry issues a formal expropriation order, he said.
The commission said that groundwater levels would not be a problem, despite environmentalists saying the opposite.
Hua said that environmental groups might have used incorrect data, or “cherry-picked data that fit” their agenda.
Taiwan Water Resources Protection Union spokeswoman Chen Jiau-hua (陳椒華) — who has raised the issue of high groundwater levels and the risk of soil liquefaction — said the committee did not review the groundwater level data she provided, but instead relied solely on data provided by developers.
“The ministry’s unwillingness to identify and solve problems and its tendency to evade responsibility are what disappoint me most,” Chen said, adding that there is little chance to overturn the commission’s decision via legal measures.
TWO CASES: The five allegedly conspired with conglomerates, threatening the nation’s governance and subverting the rules of ethical conduct, a deputy chief prosecutor said Taipei prosecutors yesterday charged three legislators and one former lawmaker with contravening the Anti-Corruption Act (貪污治罪條例) in a case linked to former Pacific Distribution Investment Co (太平洋流通) chairman Lee Heng-lung’s (李恆隆) battle with the Far Eastern Group (遠東集團) over ownership of the Pacific SOGO Department Store (太平洋崇光百貨) chain, while independent Legislator Chao Cheng-yu (趙正宇) was indicted in a separate case involving two funeral services companies and a plot of land in a national park. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators Chen Chao-ming (陳超明) and Sufin Siluko (廖國棟), Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Su Chen-ching (蘇震清) and former New Power Party legislator
PENGHU INSPECTION: Taiwan cannot let its enemies strut around in its airspace, Tsai said, one day after a Chinese spokesman denied a median line exists in the Taiwan Strait Following China’s assertion on Monday that there is no “median line” in the Taiwan Strait, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday pledged to defend the nation’s airspace during a visit to an air force base in Penghu, saying that Taiwan cannot allow others to flex their military muscle in its territorial airspace. Tsai praised the “heroic performance” of the pilots of the Indigenous Defense Fighters who have been intercepting Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force planes in recent days. “I have a lot of confidence in you. As soldiers of the Republic of China [ROC], how could we let enemies strut
Swedish Member of Parliament Hampus Hagman is pushing for changing the name of the nation’s trade office in Taipei to signal improved relations with “Asia’s perhaps foremost democracy.” Hagman on Wednesday last week proposed renaming the Swedish Trade and Invest Council to “Sweden’s Office in Taipei,” following similar changes by other nations. The Swedish Trade and Invest Council, part of Business Sweden, is owned by the Swedish government and Swedish industry. Taiwan and Sweden share important values such as respect for democracy, human rights, the rule of law and freedom of speech, Hagman said in the motion, adding that the two nations
EFFICIENCY: The rules for Philippine arrivals were revised after 17.6% of arrivals with symptoms tested positive, compared with 0.7% of those with no symptoms Starting today, Chinese spouses who hold a reunion permit can apply to enter Taiwan and travelers without symptoms from the Philippines do not need to be tested for COVID-19 upon arrival, but are to be tested after a 14-day quarantine, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) said yesterday. Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the center, said that from today, Chinese who are married to a Taiwanese citizen and hold a reunion permit can apply to the National Immigration Agency for entry into Taiwan. Chinese who are married to a foreign national and hold an accompanied reunion permit