The US on Tuesday appeared to welcome Saturday’s planned meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), although some officials had reservations.
“We encourage authorities in Beijing and Taipei to continue their constructive dialogue on the basis of dignity and respect,” US Department of State Office of Press Relations director Elizabeth Trudeau said.
However, speaking on the strict understanding of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk on the subject, another Department of State source said there was “hope and expectation” that the meeting would produce “no surprises.”
One former Department of State official said he was “uneasy” that the meeting might be used to influence the Jan. 16 presidential election.
It could not be determined how much in advance the Ma administration had informed the White House.
Asked on Tuesday about the meeting during a routine press briefing, Trudeau said the US welcomed steps taken by both sides of the Taiwan Strait in recent years to reduce tensions and improve cross-strait relations.
“The United States has a deep and abiding interest in peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait,” she said.
Trudeau said that stable and positive cross-strait ties had brought enormous benefits to the region and to the US.
She refused to discuss “our political dialogue” on the situation.
Asked if Washington had concerns about the meeting, Trudeau said: “We believe cross-strait issues should be resolved peacefully in a manner and pace acceptable to people on both sides of the Strait.”
“We have welcomed the steps both sides of the Taiwan Strait have taken in recent years,” she said. “I’m not going to speculate in advance of this. We’ve seen the reports.”
Pressed to comment about the timing of the meeting, she said: “We welcome all steps — so it’s always good timing.”
Trudeau was asked if the meeting would have any impact on US arms sales to Taiwan.
“I’m not going to speak on that. The US has a very strong unofficial relationship with Taiwan in terms of military matters,” she said.
Asked if the US played a behind-the-scenes role to facilitate the meeting, Trudeau said: “I’m not going to detail diplomatic conversations.”
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said that it was necessary to “wait to see the actual results of this meeting.”
He said that Washington’s “one China” policy was unchanged.
Other sources said that Trudeau did not deny that the US had been in some way involved in arranging the meeting.
According to the respected Nelson Report, the meeting could be seen as “an indicator of Beijing’s rising angst about the likely return of the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] to the presidency in January.”
It quoted an unnamed “observer” as asking whether the Ma administration told the White House in advance or “was this the surprise of surprises?”
The observer said the DPP is concerned that there would be an announcement following the meeting that unless the so-called “1992 consensus” was agreed to by the DPP, then economic disaster would be in the offing.
“This is an important development in cross-strait relations, as it shows the desire of both sides to influence the upcoming elections in Taiwan, which are not looking favorable right now to either,” University of Michigan associate professor of political science Mary Gallagher told the Taipei Times.
“As with the 1996 presidential elections, it seems possible that this move could cause a strong counter-reaction in Taiwan, particularly among the younger generation,” said Gallagher, who is director of the university’s Lieberthal-Rogel Center for Chinese Studies. “It appears that the KMT [Chinese Nationalist Party] is trying to use a meeting with Xi to influence the election and this could undermine support in Taiwan for the Nationalist Party — not increase it.”
Richard Bush, a former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) chairman who is now director for East Asia policy studies at the Brookings Institution, said he hoped the meeting would proceed in a manner completely acceptable to both sides and have a stabilizing effect on cross-strait relations.
Gerrit van der Wees, a senior policy adviser at the Formosa Association for Public Affairs, said he thought Ma was trying to salvage his legacy, turn the tide in the presidential election and pressure DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) to embrace the so-called “1992 consensus.”
“A meeting between the leaders from the two sides should only be held after Taiwan has reached a broad consensus on future cross-strait relations,” Van der Wees said. “Ma is playing a political game of poker with the future of the country.”
In Taipei, AIT spokesperson Sonia Urbom yesterday said the US welcomes steps by both sides of the Taiwan Strait to reduce tensions and improve cross-strait ties.
As for whether the US was aware of, or consulted about, the unprecedented meeting in advance, Urbom declined to comment on details of diplomatic discussions.
Additional reporting by Stacy Hsu
CAUTION: Taiwanese should be alert, even if they have just liked or shared posts that would breach Beijing’s national security legislation for Hong Kong, the council said Due to the newly implemented Hong Kong national security legislation, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) has drawn up a list of what it described as “high-risk groups,” cautioning them not to travel to Hong Kong. People who support independence for Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjiang; those who are critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), the Hong Kong government and the “one country, two systems” concept; and those who donated to or voiced support for the Hong Kong anti-extradition bill movement are urged to refrain from visiting Hong Kong, the council said on its Web site. It released two posts on
HONG KONG SECURITY: The president blasted regulations requiring Taiwanese agents or political organizations to provide information on their Hong Kong-related activities President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday warned of countermeasures should controversial Chinese national security legislation imposed on Hong Kong undermine or harm Taiwanese interests. Article 43 of the legislation empowers the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region to serve written notices to Taiwanese political organizations or individual agents to furnish information on their Hong Kong-related activities, including their personal particulars, finances, assets, expenditure and capital in the territory. Failure to comply or providing false or incomplete information can result in a fine of HK$100,000 (US$12,903) or imprisonment of six months or two years respectively. Tsai said that Taiwan would keep a close watch on how
NEW HONG KONG LAW: A visit to Beijing-friendly nations or those with weak judicial systems could leave people at risk of deportation to China, a former MAC official said Beijing could request countries with which it has extradition agreements to deport Taiwanese to China to face criminal charges following the implementation of national security legislation for Hong Kong, a former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) official warned yesterday. Some developing countries, and those close to China because of the Belt and Road Initiative, are likely to accommodate Beijing’s requests to extradite Taiwanese to China, said former deputy MAC minister Chen Ming-chi (陳明祺), who served from July 2, 2018, until May 20, and then returned to his former post as an assistant professor of sociology at National Tsing Hua University. While Taiwanese
MORAL COURAGE: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged the global community to face China’s intention to subdue Taiwan and reject such irrational requests The Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday strongly condemned the Chinese government for meddling with US officials’ interactions with Taiwan after FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed China’s efforts to discourage US officials from visiting Taiwan. The greatest long-term threat to the US’ information security and intellectual property, as well as its economic vitality, is China’s counterintelligence and economic espionage operations, Wray told a video event at the Hudson Institute in Washington. Beijing is engaged in a highly sophisticated and maligning foreign influence campaign, with methods that include bribery, blackmail and covert deals, he said. Giving an example, Wray said that when a US official