Dissidents from China and Tibet have accused UK police of significant overreaction after they were arrested under public order laws and had their houses searched following peaceful protests against visiting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平).
Shao Jiang (邵江), a survivor of the Tiananmen Square massacre now based in the UK, said he was shocked to be tackled by police after holding placards in front of Xi’s motorcade in London, and to learn his home had been searched and computers seized while he was in custody.
“It feels like it was when I was in China,” Shao said.
“Then, every time I was arrested the Chinese police would search my rooms and take things. It reminded me of that,” he added.
Tibetan exile groups have also reacted with anger following the arrest of two women shortly after Shao for waving a Tibetan flag near Xi’s car, and had their homes searched while they were under arrest.
The lawyer for the arrested women — Sonam Choden, 31, and Jamphel Lhamo, 33 — said in 40 years of legal experience he had never heard of police arresting people who were protesting peacefully for conspiring to contravene Section 5 of the Public Order Act, which concerns harassment or threatening behavior.
The UK metropolitan police have reacted strongly to the accusations. In an unusual step, the force released a statement from the officer in charge of policing Xi’s visit, Commander Lucy D’Orsi, saying she was “disappointed” at suggestions the force was trying to suppress legitimate protest at the instigation of China.
Police said they believe Shao and the women had been conspiring to commit threatening behavior; all three reject this claim.
The arrests took place on Wednesday afternoon as a motorcade carrying Xi and UK Prime Minister David Cameron arrived at Mansion House in London for a ceremonial banquet. Video shows Shao being tackled forcefully by officers as he stood near the cars holding two small placards. Choden and Lhamo were arrested soon after while waving a flag.
Shao’s wife, Joanna Zhang, dismissed the idea that the trio were planning to threaten anyone.
“That’s complete nonsense,” she said. “He was on his own, doing nothing apart from holding two A4 sheets of paper, one saying ‘End autocracy’ and the other saying ‘Democracy now.’ He was standing there peacefully when the police attacked him.”
Zhang said she went to a police station on Wednesday evening to bring her husband new clothes and returned home to find police officers had searched their home in her absence, seizing two computers, an iPad and a USB stick.
“It happened when I was at the police station, but they never told me they were doing this,” Zhang said.
“I only knew because the computers had gone and there was a warrant paper on my desk,” she said.
Neither she nor her husband knew what police were looking for on the computers, or when they would have their possessions returned, Zhang said.
“The warrant paper had a phone number on it, but they had left the wrong number,” she said.
“It’s quite shocking. We went into exile in 1997, first to Sweden and then the UK, and life in exile has been quiet so far,” Zhang said. “I never imagined that what happened to us in China could happen here in the UK.”
The two Tibetan women also had their houses searched and computer equipment seized while they were in custody.
Their lawyer, Bill Nash of BSB Solicitors, said the pair had been arrested for “a peaceful and what many would see as a legitimate non-violent protest concerning the treatment of their country by the Chinese regime.”
“Despite the fact that no one suggests that any violence was contemplated or offered, a decision was taken to further arrest for an offense of conspiracy to contravene section 5 of the Public Order Act of 1986. In over 40 years of legal practice I have never previously heard of an arrest for such an offense,” Nash added.
Police said in a statement they had reason to believe the arrested women were connected to Shao and that all three were conspiring to commit threatening behavior. However, Tibetan groups said this was not true.
“This was a spontaneous protest, and there was no link between the Tibetan women and Shao Jiang,” Padma Dolma from Students for a Free Tibet said.
“It’s simply not true for the police to say they were conspiring to do anything threatening. In our experience that is a common police tactic to stop people protesting,” Dolma said.
Shao tweeted a photograph of his bail conditions, showing he is not allowed within a mile of Heathrow Airport; the prime minister’s country residence, Chequers; or within 100m of Xi, to “prevent further harassment of the victim.”
Police officers said Shao was initially arrested after entering a “secure area” around the motorcade, and officers then suspected a link between him and the Tibetan activists.
All were arrested under common law to prevent a breach of the peace, before “further information” led officers to suspect an offense of conspiracy to commit threatening behavior under the Public Order Act. All three had been bailed until a later date, it added.
The subsequent statement by D’Orsi said she felt some reports intimated the police were “working to the bidding of the Chinese to suppress protest.”
“The policing of the state visit was a matter for the Metropolitan police service and any other suggestion is wrong,” D’Orsi said:
“My team and I have worked tirelessly to facilitate peaceful protest throughout the state visit. The assertion that political manipulation of the command team or, indeed, the broader Metropolitan police took place is wrong and doesn’t reflect the facts,” she said.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from