Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) description of cross-strait relations as two sides “belonging to one China” risked leading to a “misunderstanding” that Taiwan belongs to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsia (夏立言) said in Taipei yesterday.
There is a subtle difference between that description and the so-called “1992 consensus” adopted by the government, under which both sides of the Taiwan Strait recognize that there is ‘“one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means, Hsia told a meeting of the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee in Taipei.
The government has tried to avoid using the language Chu used because of political sensitivities and has opposed the formula whenever the Chinese mention it, Hsia said.
Photo: Chien Jung-fong, Taipei Times
“We consider it unacceptable. That position remains unchanged,” he said. “We would not choose to use of words he [Chu] did.”
However, Hsia commended Chu’s characterization of the “1992 consensus,” saying that Chu intended to highlight the importance of the consensus — although he used a different way to express it.
“If the ‘one China’ he [Chu] meant was the Republic of China [ROC], as he said it was, of course I am not opposed to the idea,” Hsia said.
Hsia was invited to the meeting to take legislators’ questions over Chu’s just-concluded trip to China, where he met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and attended the 10th Cross-Strait Economic, Trade and Culture Forum cohosted by the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Chu’s statement that “both sides [of the Taiwan Strait] belong to ‘one China,’ with differences in connotations and definitions [of ‘one China’]” was at the center of the sometimes heated debate.
Hsia did not voice his opinion about Chu’s definition of the “1992 consensus” until he was grilled by legislators from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Taiwan Solidarity Union and the People First Party — one after another — about whether the government had shifted its position from the “1992 consensus,” or what it said was “one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what ‘China’ means” to “both sides belonging to ‘one China.’”
In the beginning, Hsia said the phrasing of “both sides belonging to ‘one China,’” was similar to the “1992 consensus” of “one China, with each side having its own interpretation of what ‘China’ means.”
Hsia said Chu was the first person in the ROC to describe cross-strait relations as being “two sides belonging to one China,” a term coined by Beijing and commonly used by Chinese officials — most recently by Xi in March.
He was then corrected by DPP Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), who said former KMT chairmen Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) and Lien Chan (連戰) had both proposed the idea before.
The statement made by former Mainland Affairs Council minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) in March 2013, in response to then-Chinese vice premier Li Keqiang (李克強), who said both sides belong to “one China,” that the characterization was “unacceptable” remains valid, Hsia said.
BUSY DAY: The same day the USS ‘Barry’ passed through the Strait, Taiwan was ending its Han Kuang military exercises, while China said it conducted an exercise near Taiwan A US Navy ship on Friday sailed through the Taiwan Strait, marking the ninth time a US military vessel has transited the Strait since US President Joe Biden took office in January. The USS Barry, an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, conducted a “routine” transit through the Strait, the US Navy said in a statement, adding that the journey through international waters was conducted “in accordance with international law.” “The ship’s transit through the Taiwan Strait demonstrates the US’ commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific,” the US Navy said. “The United States military flies, sails and operates anywhere international law allows.” The Ministry
FRUIT SPAT: The COA said China had not given evidence for halting wax and custard apple imports, adding that it would spend NT$1bn on promoting sales of the fruit Taipei threatened to take China to the WTO yesterday after Beijing said it would suspend wax apple and custard apple imports from Taiwan due to pest concerns. China’s customs administration earlier yesterday said it had repeatedly found pests called Planococcus minor, a type of mealybug, on wax and custard apples from Taiwan. It asked its Guangdong branch and all affiliated offices to stop clearing the products from today. China had acted unilaterally, without providing scientific evidence, Council of Agriculture (COA) Minister Chen Chi-chung (陳吉仲) told a news conference, criticizing the announcement’s timing, as it came during the Mid-Autumn Festival, celebrated in Taiwan
ON ALERT: A woman who tested positive for COVID-19 while abroad last year tested negative twice in Taiwan before showing a positive result on Sunday, the center said The Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) yesterday reported two locally transmitted COVID-19 infections, four imported cases and no deaths. The CECC meanwhile warned nearly 500 people to monitor their health after a woman tested postive. The center also reported that a previous local case — a female worker at Taoyuan International Airport Services (桃園航勤), who had the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 — likely contracted the disease from the same source as a previous imported case from Turkey. Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中), who heads the center, said that the two local cases were reported in Taipei, and are a
CLOSED DOORS? The new US rules, which are to be implemented in November, have sparked concern in Taiwan, given its low fully vaccinated coverage rate The US plans to allow entry to most foreign air travelers as long as they are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 — while adding a testing requirement for unvaccinated Americans and barring entry for foreigners who have not received shots. The measures announced on Monday by the White House mark the most sweeping change to US travel policies in months, and widen the gap in rules between vaccinated people — who would see restrictions relaxed — and unvaccinated people. The new rules would replace existing bans on foreigners’ travel to the US from certain regions, including Europe. While the move would open the