Fri, Apr 17, 2015 page1

• Taipei Dome, mall facing demolition

  DOOMED DOME? Taipei’s safety inspection commission recommended that either the Dome or its neighboring shopping mall should be demolished due to safety issues

  • By Abraham Gerber / Staff reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Either the Taipei Dome (台北大巨蛋) or its neighboring shopping mall should be demolished, Taipei Deputy Mayor Charles Lin (林欽榮) said yesterday, as he presented the results of the city’s safety inspection commission into the Dome’s evacuation plans.

  Computer analysis of the evacuation plans found that the construction of a large shopping mall adjoining the Dome would prevent the site from being evacuated within 15 minutes.

  In addition to increasing the difficulty of evacuating the Dome itself, the city’s computer model found that the shopping mall would be difficult to evacuate, with exits remaining clogged a full hour after an evacuation began.

  

  The Taipei Dome construction site is pictured yesterday. The Taipei City Government’s safety inspection commission recommended that Farglory Land Development Co demolish the adjacent shopping mall or the Taipei Dome itself due to safety concerns.

  Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times

  Lin attributed the results to overbuilding on the construction site by contractor Farglory Land Development Co (遠雄建設), with the area occupied by buildings increasing from 46 percent in the initial plan put forward in 2004 to 54.5 percent at present.

  “An area equal to five Sogos has been added to the complex,” Lin said, referring to the Taipei Pacific Sogo Department Store (太平洋崇光百貨) shopping mall. “Excessive additional building space has caused the Taipei Sports and Cultural Park to become highly dangerous and a potential disaster area.”

  He said that the city’s analysis found that the open space surrounding the Dome complex could only hold 60,000 people, far fewer than the estimated 140,000 people who could be inside the buildings during an emergency.

  

  A composite photograph shows the Taipei City Government’s two alternatives for the Taipei Dome project. In the first option, left, the dome is kept, but the shopping mall along Guangfu S Road to the left of the dome is converted into open space and the first two floors of the buildings to the right of the dome are turned into open space, while in the second option the dome is torn down, and the surrounding buildings are kept for public use.

  Photo courtesy of the Taipei City Government

  He added that the lack of space would also prevent fire trucks from attending a disaster at the site.

  “The site design would crowd everyone onto [neighboring] Guangfu S Road and Zhongxiao E Road,” Lin said. “In that event, how can rescue operations be conducted?”

  Lin said that while the city “respected” the Ministry of the Interior Construction and Planning Agency’s approval of site safety plans, it questioned whether a truly rigorous analysis had been conducted, given the lack of clear national standards for evaluating a structure as large as the Taipei Dome.

  

  Taipei Deputy Mayor Charles Lin yesterday speaks to reporters at a Taipei Dome safety inspection information session at Taipei City Hall.

  Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times

  He said Farglory had failed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of evacuation procedures for the entire complex, while setting an unrealistic evacuation objective of having all of the spectators out of their seats within eight minutes in a “preliminary” evacuation, compared with the 15-minute complete evacuation standard used in Japan.

  Lin said that Farglory also incorporated other numerous problematic assumptions into their model, including failing to take into consideration the obstacle Dome seating would present to fleeing spectators.

  He said the firm made an unrealistic calculation of how quickly fleeing spectators would be able to escape the structure and also inflated the amount of “open space” around the structure by incorporating stairways and failing to subtract space which would be needed for rescue operations.

  While Farglory’s analysis only involves an “ordinary” evacuation, the city conducted an “emergency” analysis, he said.

  Lin also cited the ease with which a fire could spread throughout the complex as a major concern, calling the two stories of parking beneath the site which connects the different buildings “unprecedented.”

  A fire within the parking lot would be extremely difficult to reach and extinguish, while it could easily spread throughout the complex, he said.

  Given the safety problems unearthed, the commission recommended that either the Dome itself or the neighboring mall should be demolished to provide more open space for an emergency evacuation, he said, adding that the site’s underground parking should also be sealed off.

  The complex’s other buildings would be unaffected.

  Lin declined to comment on the effect the city’s report would have on ongoing negotiations with Farglory, adding that the negotiations were the responsibility of a separate committee headed by Deputy Mayor Teng Chia-chi (鄧家基).

  Teng refused to respond to reporters’ questions, instead releasing a statement saying that as long as there were public safety concerns the city would not allow the complex to begin operations.

  The Taipei City Government launched a safety investigation into the Dome after Farglory refused to agree to demands for concessions during a renegotiation of the terms of the contract.

  The Taipei Department of Sports said that the Taipei Gymnasium could serve as the main site for the 2017 Universiade if the Taipei Dome is unavailable.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Iran’s supreme leader Khamenei killed

  • 2

    Iran prepare for Women’s Asian Cup in Australia as bombs drop on homeland

  • 3

    For Bangladesh, just playing is a win

  • 4

    Marco Bezzecchi wins MotoGP opener

  • 5

    Liverpool rocked by last-gasp defeat at Wolves