The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday reminded current and former US officials to carefully avoid violating the US principle of promoting democracy diplomatically when commenting on Taiwan’s elections, while reassuring the US that the DPP would do its best to maintain peace and stability in cross-strait relations.
DPP Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) issued a statement in response to remarks made by former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) managing director Barbara Schrage in Washington on Friday about DPP Chairperson and prospective presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) cross-strait policy.
Schrage told a conference on US-Taiwan relations hosted by the Heritage Foundation that Tsai was unable to clarify Washington’s doubts about her China policy when she visited the US in September 2011 as the DPP’s candidate for the 2012 presidential election, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“What the administration wanted to hear was what was her specific plan for dealing with the cross-strait issue, and frankly she was very disappointing in that area,” CNA quoted Schrage as saying.
Schrage retired in January last year from the position she had held since 2006.
If Tsai cannot present something new this time, she will not be able to pass the test easily, Schrage said, according to the CNA report.
Tsai has recently confirmed an upcoming trip to Washington.
Schrage said that the DPP does not necessarily have to accept the so-called “1992 consensus,” but it should find ways to narrow its differences with Beijing.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese government that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” is.
The DPP does not accept the “1992 consensus,” viewing it as what it describes as the KMT’s wishful thinking, since Beijing has never officially accepted the existence of the “Republic of China” in the KMT’s version of “one China.”
“The important thing, I think, is that the DPP demonstrates that it understands the seriousness of the issue, that it cannot simply duck the issue, and that it tries to find ways to come up with a formula that will meet — to some extent — the concerns of China, the concerns of the United States and the concerns of the people of Taiwan, who clearly favor stability,” CNA quoted Schrage as saying.
Tsai needs to let people know in advance how she will deal with cross-strait relations if elected, Schrage added.
Schrage’s remarks fed widespread media coverage yesterday in Taiwan and caused the DPP to contact the US to ask for clarification.
The US told the party that Schrage is not authorized by the US government to make such comments, so her remarks reflected her personal views, Wu said.
The DPP hopes that what Schrage has said “would not be wrongfully interpreted in any way to influence democratic elections in Taiwan,” Wu said.
In an apparent bid to dismiss some media reports that Schrage was perceived as conveying a message from US government to Tsai, Wu yesterday said the DPP has various formal channels of communication with the US through which both sides exchange views and discuss issues without hindrance.
“It is absolutely unnecessary that the US send messages [to the DPP] through such a channel that is not at all authoritative,” Wu said.
Remarks by retired US officials are prone to misinterpretation and could mislead the public to the degree at which they might intervene in elections in Taiwan, Wu said, adding that this goes against the fundamental values that the US has embraced in promoting democracy abroad.
“We believe that this is not what they want; and therefore, we would like to once again remind them to be careful [in their comments],” Wu said.
Earlier yesterday, Tsai was asked by reporters to respond to Schrage’s comments.
“The DPP’s cross-strait policy is pretty clear: Cross-strait relations must remain peaceful and stable,” Tsai said.
“We will do our best to maintain this status quo,” she added.
“Most importantly, we will maintain good communications with all parties concerned to avoid miscalculation or misunderstanding about the way we deal with cross-strait relations, and the process will lay a basis for mutual trust,” Tsai said.
Tsai did not make further comment on the “1992 consensus” yesterday, saying that the DPP’s stance on the issue has been clearly expressed on many occasions before.
AIT spokesperson Mark Zimmer told the Taipei Times that Schrage does not represent the US government now, since she has retired.
Asked if the US government has taken note of the DPP’s concerns over possible intervention from retired US officials in Taiwan’s elections, Zimmer said that the US government does not tell people what they can and cannot say.
“But it’s important to note that they are retired officials. They are no longer associated with the government and they speak for themselves,” Zimmer said.
‘NO EQUILIBRIUM’: Taiwan’s increased defense spending is a good step, but it needs to do more to have the ability to deter aggression from China, a senior US official said The US plans to sell as many as seven major weapons systems — including mines, cruise missiles and drones — to Taiwan, four people familiar with the discussions said. Pursuing seven sales at once is a rare departure from years of precedent in which US military sales to Taiwan were spaced out and carefully calibrated to minimize tensions with Beijing. However, US President Donald Trump’s administration has this year become more aggressive with China, and the sales would land as relations between Beijing and Washington are at their lowest point in decades over accusations of spying, lingering trade tensions, disputes about the
ON THEIR OWN: The KMT has decided not to participate as a party at this year’s forum, and if any members do go, they would not be representing the party, Alicia Wang said The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday announced that it would not send a delegation “as a political party” to this year’s Straits Forum, after a Chinese TV program described the planned visit to the annual meeting as “suing for peace.” The 12th forum is scheduled to open in Xiamen, China, on Saturday. On Tuesday last week, the KMT announced that former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) would lead the party’s delegation to the forum, with KMT Secretary-General Lee Chien-lung (李乾龍) as deputy head. However, on Thursday last week, China Central Television’s (CCTV) Yangshipin (央視頻) program, hosted by Li Hong (李紅), included a headline
RIVERSIDE CAMP: As rescuers continued their search for a missing man, Taipower said that the floodgates at a hydro plant on the Lishi Creek opened due to a malfunction Three people have been confirmed dead and one was missing after being swept away by a flash flood while camping in Nantou County’s Renai Township (仁愛), police said yesterday. Six people from two families were camping near Lishi Creek (栗栖溪) when the riverbanks were suddenly flooded just after 4am, carrying away four of the campers — including two children — who were asleep in their tents, police said. A man who was among those swept away was able to climb ashore and call for help, police said, adding that another man had gone missing in the turmoil at the campsite.
WORKING OVERTIME? NTU professor Lee Duu-jong denied that he had held a part-time position at a Chinese university or joined China’s Thousand Talents Program A candidate for the post of National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST) president yesterday dropped out of the race following a report questioning his links to Chinese academia and government programs. Lee Duu-jong (李篤中), a professor at National Taiwan University’s (NTU) chemical engineering department, was a member of China’s Changjiang Scholars’ Program in 2006 and was on the list of its Thousand Talents Program in 2017, a report by Chinese-language Mirror Media magazine said yesterday. The article said that Lee is suspected of having held a part-time job at the Harbin Institute of Technology in China and was the recipient