Amid criticism over a surprise policy flip-flop on the civil service payment system that would have seen the government save NT$383 million (US$12.73 million) a year in interest payments, Executive Yuan spokesperson Sun Lih-chuyn (孫立群) yesterday said it was his “fault” for not knowing that Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) had called off the proposal to change the system.
Sun’s acceptance of responsibility for the policy U-turn did not stop criticism that the government had put the brakes on the proposal to avoid upsetting the affected group — civil servants, public school teachers and military personnel, who are traditionally regarded as pan-blue supporters — in the run-up to the seven-in-one elections on Nov. 29.
While pensions are supposed to be paid out on a monthly basis, under the current system, civil service retirees receive theirs twice a year — in January and July. The proposal would have changed the payment interval to a quarterly basis, with payments being given out in January, April, July and October starting next year.
However, the Executive Yuan sent a text message to reporters at 9:52pm on Wednesday saying that the payment system is to remain unchanged.
It came hours after Sun confirmed a report in the Chinese-language United Daily Evening News on Wednesday that the system was to be changed.
Sun apologized again at a press conference yesterday, saying he did not know that the proposed change was overruled at a meeting presided over by Jiang at about the same time he was talking to reporters.
“It’s all my fault,” Sun said, dismissing speculation that Jiang scrapped the proposal amid concern that it would displease traditional supporters of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
Jiang decided that the payment system should stay the same “because tax collections are expected to increase as the economy continues its recovery trend,” thus making it less urgent to carry out the reform at the moment, Sun added.
On Wednesday afternoon, Sun told reporters that the proposal to change the payment interval was made on March 28 by an Executive Yuan task force charged with fiscal reform.
The task force also decided that pensions should be paid out every month starting in 2017 to reduce interest costs by an estimated NT$640 million per year, he said.
Paying out pensions at shorter intervals enables the government to pay less in interest on loans it takes out to cover the retirement benefits and to gain more interest earnings, Sun said.
The policy U-turn drew mixed reactions from lawmakers.
“When the government knows that there are people opposed to the proposed policy and decides not to proceed with the plan... I would say it is a positive response to public opinion,” KMT Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) said.
Lin said that the proposed change was wrong because increasing the payment interval would mean elderly retirees would have to make more trips to collect their pensions, which can be tiring, he said.
“It would only inconvenience them,” he added.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said that the flip-flop again proved that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was incapable of advancing reforms when it comes to preferential treatment extended to retired and current public servants, public school teachers and military personnel, despite the burden it imposes on the nation’s finances and the social injustice.
CARROT AND STICK: While unrelenting in its military threats, China attracted nearly 40,000 Taiwanese to over 400 business events last year Nearly 40,000 Taiwanese last year joined industry events in China, such as conferences and trade fairs, supported by the Chinese government, a study showed yesterday, as Beijing ramps up a charm offensive toward Taipei alongside military pressure. China has long taken a carrot-and-stick approach to Taiwan, threatening it with the prospect of military action while reaching out to those it believes are amenable to Beijing’s point of view. Taiwanese security officials are wary of what they see as Beijing’s influence campaigns to sway public opinion after Taipei and Beijing gradually resumed travel links halted by the COVID-19 pandemic, but the scale of
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
Pope Francis is be laid to rest on Saturday after lying in state for three days in St Peter’s Basilica, where the faithful are expected to flock to pay their respects to history’s first Latin American pontiff. The cardinals met yesterday in the Vatican’s synod hall to chart the next steps before a conclave begins to choose Francis’ successor, as condolences poured in from around the world. According to current norms, the conclave must begin between May 5 and 10. The cardinals set the funeral for Saturday at 10am in St Peter’s Square, to be celebrated by the dean of the College
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s