Sunflower movement leaders Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) and Chen Wei-ting (陳為廷) yesterday announced the establishment of a new social activist group, Taiwan March (島國前進), saying the group would focus on the “unfinished business” of the three-week-long movement’s goal of promoting “direct democracy.”
“It seemed to us that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] have not learned a thing [from the Sunflower movement] and they still refuse to listen to the public,” Chen told a press conference.
Having vowed to keep safeguarding Taiwan’s democracy after the Sunflower movement withdrew from the Legislative Yuan on April 10 — which they occupied to protest against what they described as the opaque negotiation of the cross-strait service trade agreement — Chen said the government has not changed.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
“In the past month, the government has insisted on its own version of a statute to monitor cross-strait agreements, tried to push through the statute on the free economic pilot zones and launched a counter-offensive against the campaign to recall KMT lawmakers,” Chen said.
“What’s worse, the Ma administration began its judicial persecution against the protesters after they pulled out of the legislature,” added Chen, who is a student at National Tsing Hua University.
The group’s name, Taiwan March, indicates the group’s determination to keep marching forward and to highlight the month the Sunflower movement rose up.
The group’s founders include Academia Sinica associate research fellow Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) and Shih Hsin University assistant professor Frida Tsai (蔡培慧), as well as students and citizens.
The group’s goal is to “drive Taiwanese politics with social forces,” said Lin, a National Taiwan University graduate student.
However, he reiterated that the group would not establish a new political party, nor would it recommend candidates in future elections.
The group’s first task, Lin said, would be promoting the lowering of the threshold of the Referendum Act (公民投票法), known as a “bird cage” act, among a wide range of issues.
Taiwan March is soon to launch a petition drive across the nation to gather in six months the required number of signatures to pass the first stage, Lin said.
Next up is the free-trade issue, with a comprehensive discussion about how Taiwan should position itself in the free-trade system, which the group does not oppose, Lin said, to safeguard people’s wellbeing and the national interests at the same time.
On other issues, such as the cross-strait service trade pact and the statute governing the economic pilot zones, Lin said that the group would collaborate with other social groups, including Democracy Kuroshio (民主黑潮), Democracy Tautin (民主鬥陣), the Black Island Nation Youth Front (黑色島國青年聯盟) and the Appendectomy Project (割闌尾計畫).
The founding of Taiwan March and separate efforts by various groups should not be interpreted as “division of the core leadership of the Sunflower movement,” Lin said.
“It’s just that each group shared the same goal, but decided to tackle different issues with various approaches,” he said.
Lin also denied that the group had any connection with the Taiwan Citizen Union (公民組合), a political group initiated by former Democratic Progressive Party chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄).
Information about the new group can be found at www.facebook.com/taiwanmarch.tw.
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks
Nearly half of Taiwanese believe President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has not done enough to prepare the nation against Chinese aggression, the a poll released yesterday by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation showed. Asked whether the Tsai administration’s military and non-military preparations to defend Taiwan are adequate, 30.6 percent said they were “mostly inadequate” and 18.9 percent said they “very inadequate,” while 25.7 percent said they were “mostly adequate” and 7.1 percent said they were “very adequate.” Another 17.6 percent had no opinion or did not know enough to form a judgement. Still, 51 percent of respondents approved of Tsai’s national defense policy,