Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) yesterday panned the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) plan to table a special statute for a referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, saying it was irresponsible, cursory and concocted solely to help the DPP achieve the results that it wants.
The proposed statute would allow a referendum on the controversial project to pass with a simple majority vote. The Referendum Act (公民投票法) requires the participation of half of the nation’s eligible voters, half of whom must cast a “yes” vote for the plebiscite to be valid.
Jiang said the DPP has no “central credo” and takes referendum “as a child’s play.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“On the one hand, the DPP calls for a simple majority that would leave out the [current] threshold requiring the participation of 50 percent of eligible voters. That would mean that a majority of two people voting yes to halt construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in a three-people-vote would make the referendum valid — a type of referendum that is nowhere to be seen in the world,” he said.
Accusing the DPP of having “arbitrary, inconsistent” and double standards, Jiang cited another proposal by DPP Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) that would require all agreements signed with China to be put to a “stringent” referendum.
The proposal states that a referendum on a cross-strait agreement would require the consent of three-quarters of the legislators before being put to a vote, and would require half of the nation’s 14 million eligible voters’ affirmative ballots for it to pass.
“It is the most stringent regulation we have ever seen,” he said.
Based on these two proposals, it is not hard to see that the DPP is being arbitrary in dealing with issues about the referendum system, Jiang added.
“There is no consistency in its thinking as it all depends on the issue under debate. When [the DPP] wants a referendum to pass, the threshold should be lowered; when it is a controversial issue that it wants to axe, the threshold should be raised,” Jiang said.
DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) later rebutted Jiang’s comments, saying that Yu’s version was a recommendation by a civil group, not by the party.
Wu added that the civil version’s proposal has a high threshold because cross-strait agreements concern the nation’s sovereignty.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that Jiang’s juxtaposition of the two versions of the referendum were like comparing “bananas and sunflowers,” adding that referendums involving issues relating to sovereignty and to public infrastructure were fundamentally different from the outset.
DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) said that Jiang’s description of the DPP proposal as “a child’s play” was designed to mislead the public into thinking that the issue was merely political confrontation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP.
According to a survey conducted by the DPP on Wednesday and Thursday, 80.4 percent of the public supports holding a national referendum to resolve the decades-long controversy over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, DPP spokesperson Xavier Chang (張惇涵) said, adding that only 12.7 percent opposes the proposal.
The survey also found that 79.2 percent of respondents in New Taipei City and 85.8 percent in Taipei agree that a referendum should be held to determine whether the plant should continue, he added.
‘NO EQUILIBRIUM’: Taiwan’s increased defense spending is a good step, but it needs to do more to have the ability to deter aggression from China, a senior US official said The US plans to sell as many as seven major weapons systems — including mines, cruise missiles and drones — to Taiwan, four people familiar with the discussions said. Pursuing seven sales at once is a rare departure from years of precedent in which US military sales to Taiwan were spaced out and carefully calibrated to minimize tensions with Beijing. However, US President Donald Trump’s administration has this year become more aggressive with China, and the sales would land as relations between Beijing and Washington are at their lowest point in decades over accusations of spying, lingering trade tensions, disputes about the
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS: Several of the PLA fighter jets that crossed the median line of the Strait came within 68km of Hsinchu, drawing warnings from Taiwan, the ministry said At least 18 Chinese military aircraft yesterday flew into the nation’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ) on the second day of a US delegation’s visit, the Ministry of National Defense said, adding that the military responded by deploying an air defense missile system to monitor their activities. A delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach on Thursday started a three-day visit to Taiwan. The ministry from Thursday started publicizing the actions of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in Taiwan’s ADIZ on its Web site and Twitter. According to ministry reports, 18 PLA aircraft
WORKING OVERTIME? NTU professor Lee Duu-jong denied that he had held a part-time position at a Chinese university or joined China’s Thousand Talents Program A candidate for the post of National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST) president yesterday dropped out of the race following a report questioning his links to Chinese academia and government programs. Lee Duu-jong (李篤中), a professor at National Taiwan University’s (NTU) chemical engineering department, was a member of China’s Changjiang Scholars’ Program in 2006 and was on the list of its Thousand Talents Program in 2017, a report by Chinese-language Mirror Media magazine said yesterday. The article said that Lee is suspected of having held a part-time job at the Harbin Institute of Technology in China and was the recipient
A Taiwanese bird protection group yesterday said that it has been kicked out of BirdLife International — a global conservation partnership — after it refused to sign a statement saying it would never advocate independence. The Taipei-based Chinese Wild Bird Federation said that BirdLife International last week voted to remove it, ending a partnership that had been in place since 1996. Over the past 20 years, the federation has changed its English name three times to satisfy BirdLife International, and recently the international group demanded that it change its Chinese name and sign a statement that it is “formally committing to not