Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) yesterday panned the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) plan to table a special statute for a referendum on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, saying it was irresponsible, cursory and concocted solely to help the DPP achieve the results that it wants.
The proposed statute would allow a referendum on the controversial project to pass with a simple majority vote. The Referendum Act (公民投票法) requires the participation of half of the nation’s eligible voters, half of whom must cast a “yes” vote for the plebiscite to be valid.
Jiang said the DPP has no “central credo” and takes referendum “as a child’s play.”
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
“On the one hand, the DPP calls for a simple majority that would leave out the [current] threshold requiring the participation of 50 percent of eligible voters. That would mean that a majority of two people voting yes to halt construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in a three-people-vote would make the referendum valid — a type of referendum that is nowhere to be seen in the world,” he said.
Accusing the DPP of having “arbitrary, inconsistent” and double standards, Jiang cited another proposal by DPP Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) that would require all agreements signed with China to be put to a “stringent” referendum.
The proposal states that a referendum on a cross-strait agreement would require the consent of three-quarters of the legislators before being put to a vote, and would require half of the nation’s 14 million eligible voters’ affirmative ballots for it to pass.
“It is the most stringent regulation we have ever seen,” he said.
Based on these two proposals, it is not hard to see that the DPP is being arbitrary in dealing with issues about the referendum system, Jiang added.
“There is no consistency in its thinking as it all depends on the issue under debate. When [the DPP] wants a referendum to pass, the threshold should be lowered; when it is a controversial issue that it wants to axe, the threshold should be raised,” Jiang said.
DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) later rebutted Jiang’s comments, saying that Yu’s version was a recommendation by a civil group, not by the party.
Wu added that the civil version’s proposal has a high threshold because cross-strait agreements concern the nation’s sovereignty.
DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that Jiang’s juxtaposition of the two versions of the referendum were like comparing “bananas and sunflowers,” adding that referendums involving issues relating to sovereignty and to public infrastructure were fundamentally different from the outset.
DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) said that Jiang’s description of the DPP proposal as “a child’s play” was designed to mislead the public into thinking that the issue was merely political confrontation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP.
According to a survey conducted by the DPP on Wednesday and Thursday, 80.4 percent of the public supports holding a national referendum to resolve the decades-long controversy over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, DPP spokesperson Xavier Chang (張惇涵) said, adding that only 12.7 percent opposes the proposal.
The survey also found that 79.2 percent of respondents in New Taipei City and 85.8 percent in Taipei agree that a referendum should be held to determine whether the plant should continue, he added.
NPP WARNING: The NPP’s chairman said that a security law proposed by Beijing means it has renounced its promise to maintain ‘one country, two systems’ in HK The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) yesterday proposed changing the law to provide protection for those seeking political asylum. China at the opening of the National People’s Congress in Beijing on Thursday introduced a draft security law for Hong Kong to ban treason, subversion and sedition, with a review expected next week. TPP caucus whip Jang Chyi-lu (張其祿) said that the party is concerned about democracy advocates in Hong Kong and has taken action to support them. The party has proposed an amendment to Article 18 of the Act Governing Relations with Hong Kong and Macau (香港澳門關係條例), which stipulates that the government can offer
The number of people from Hong Kong applying for residency in Taiwan last year rose 41 percent from a year earlier to 5,858, National Immigration Agency statistics showed. The statistics also showed that 600 applications were filed by Hong Kong residents in the first quarter of this year — three times the number filed in the same period last year — with applicants apparently not deterred by the COVID-19 pandemic. Just one day after it was reported that the Chinese government plans to enact new national security laws in Hong Kong, inquiries regarding immigration to Taiwan grew 10-fold, a Hong Kong-based immigration
‘BEGINNING OF THE END’: Democracy advocate Joshua Wong urged Hong Kongers to stand up and fight, and let the Chinese government know that they will not cave Hong Kong protesters yesterday battled with riot police in busy downtown areas, showing their opposition toward China’s dramatic move to crack down on dissent in the biggest demonstration since the coronavirus swept through the territory in January. Police deployed a water cannon and fired tear gas in the Causeway Bay shopping area after hundreds of protesters had gathered to oppose new national security legislation from China. Police warned the crowd they were taking part in an illegal gathering, and later said in a statement that “rioters threw umbrellas, water bottles and other objects at them.” At least 120 people were arrested,
‘TAIWAN IS SAFE’: As there have been no new local cases for 42 days, people should feel free to travel around the nation — as long as they follow disease prevention rules No new cases of COVID-19 were reported yesterday and only 20 of the people hospitalized after testing positive are still being treated in hospitals, Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said yesterday in Pingtung County’s Kenting (墾丁) as he promoted a “new disease prevention lifestyle” for the nation. As yesterday was the 42nd consecutive day with no new domestic cases, and experts consider 28 consecutive days with no domestic case — the span of two incubation periods — a sign that a community is relatively safe, Taiwan is safe, said Chen, who heads the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC),