Academics and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday rejected Premier Jiang Yi-huah’s (江宜樺) criticism that their proposals on establishing a mechanism to monitor cross-strait agreements were aimed at providing a legal basis for defining Taiwan and China ties as state-to-state relations.
Jiang on Thursday described the version sponsored by the Democratic Front Against Cross-Strait Trade in Services Agreement — one of the groups leading the ongoing legislative siege against the cross-strait service trade agreement — as a bill designed to change the “status quo.”
“The purpose of the [civic group’s] bill is to provide a legal text to define cross-strait relations as ‘state-to-state relations,’ which is inconsistent with the Constitution,” Jiang told a press conference on Thursday when asked about the group’s proposal.
As opposed to the government’s proposed oversight bill — which defines a cross-strait deal as one between the “Taiwan area” and the “Mainland area” — the civic group’s proposal states that it is one signed between the “Republic of China (ROC) government in Taiwan” and the “People’s Republic of China (PRC) government on the mainland.”
Another proposal drafted by the DPP terms a cross-strait deal as an agreement signed between “Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China (China).”
In response to Jiang’s remarks, Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強), convener of the Democratic Front Against Cross-strait Trade in Services Agreement, denied that the group’s proposal would change the status quo.
“In fact, the civic group’s version affirms President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) repeated call for China to recognize the existence of the ROC,” Lai said.
Chiou Wen-tsong (邱文聰), an associate research professor at Academia Sinica Institutum Jurisprudentiae, said the group’s proposal conforms to the concept of “mutual non-denial of jurisdiction,” which President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has advocated as an effective approach to handling cross-strait relations.
Jiang’s comments appear to be a diversionary tactic to draw the public’s attention away from establishing a mechanism to effectively supervise cross-strait negotiations, Chiou said.
The group’s proposal does not seek to address the nature of Taiwan and China relations, but only to regulate interactions and exchanges between the two governments on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, he added.
Meanwhile, DPP Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁) said that the Ma administration refuses to consider cross-strait ties as “state-to-state” relations or between “two states” because of its “communist-phobia.”
If the proposals presented by the civic group or the DPP were aimed at institutionalizing state-to-state relations, “does it follow that the government’s version would provide a legal basis [for China’s claim that] Taiwan is part of China?” Chen asked.
Chiang Huang-chih (姜皇池), professor of international law at National Taiwan University, said that if the government’s oversight bill is enacted, the legislature would not be able to review the cross-strait service trade pact.
The government’s oversight bill does not give the legislature the power to review a cross-strait deal where its contents do not require any legal amendment or any new legislation, and would consider an agreement to be already ratified by the legislature if the review process went beyond six months, Chiang said.
If the government’s oversight bill is passed by the legislature, the cross-strait service trade agreement, which was sent to the legislature in June last year, would be deemed to be ratified by the legislature, he said.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from