Experts yesterday expressed concerns over gaps in the nation’s legal system to address threats to national security and Internet freedom that could result from the proposed opening-up of international simple resale (ISR) services to Chinese investors under the cross-strait service trade agreement.
Dubbing the commitment to open ISR services in Taiwan to Chinese investors “an e-version Trojan Horse clause” at a forum in Taipei yesterday, Lin Ying-dar (林盈達), a professor at the Institute of Computer Science and Engineering at National Chiao Tung University, imagined how the country might look in the next five to ten years.
Lin said that China could use Internet communications intercepted from legislators to influence the drafting of laws in Taiwan. Another was the risk of surveillance by Internet providers partially owned by Chinese investors.
ISR, a so-called Type II telecommunications service, refers to all telecommunications service providers other than Type I providers, which install network infrastructure traditionally providing telephone and similar services.
If a country says “no” to the use of network equipment from Chinese vendor Huawei Technologies Co (華為) or from ZTE Corp (中興), the answer to whether to allow Chinese to invest in ISR service providers is an emphatic “no” Lin said.
“Otherwise it would be like a vendor not being allowed to sell a certain kind of medicine to a country, but still being permitted to open a hospital in a country where the medication is used for prescriptions,” he said.
Tsai Zse-hong (蔡志宏), a professor in the department of electrical engineering at National Taiwan University, disputed the claim by the National Communication Commission (NCC), the regulatory authority overseeing the telecommunication industry, that investments by China would be limited by provisions on the use of isolated networks to non-individuals.
The opening-up policy would allow Chinese to invest in content providers, Internet service providers (ISPs), cloud service providers, online community providers and other Type II telecommunications service companies. They could invest in one of the nation’s major network access points, a public network exchange facility where ISPs can connect with one another in peering arrangements, Tsai said.
Should one of the nation’s major network access points be under the control of Chinese investors, it would pose a serious threat to national security, businesses, and individuals’ rights to privacy, because they could easily intercept information, Tsai said.
ISR service is the system supporting a country’s various types of critical infrastructure like healthcare, finance and public transportation, which are considered in need of strict protection in many other countries, Tsai said.
Yang Hsiao-hsien (楊孝先), who leads an alliance of neitzens advocating freedom of speech on the Internet, expressed his worries that the opening-up policy would turn the Internet in Taiwan into an area with no freedom of expression.
There might be self-censorship by Taiwanese enterprises in which Chinese have invested money, for the sake of “harmony,” he said.
The forum was one of a series of events organized by the Public Economic Research Center of National Taiwan University to explain the impact of the service trade agreement to the public.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from