President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) interpretation of the so-called “1992 consensus” has been tilting toward Beijing’s definition, as evidenced by his latest message to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), and that could spell trouble for Taiwan’s future, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus said yesterday.
In his reply to Xi’s congratulatory letter for his re-election as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman on Saturday, Ma wrote that “both sides of the Taiwan Strait reached a consensus in 1992 to express each other’s insistence on the ‘one China’ principle.”
“The message marked the latest retreat Ma has made about the ‘1992 consensus.’ It was unacceptable and reflected that eventual unification is Ma’s vision of Taiwan’s future,” DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) told a press conference.
Ma has given up his ground over the years on the sensitive political term, which he and the KMT always called “the foundation of cross-strait peace and the most important element for the best cross-strait ties in six decades,” Gao said.
According to the lawmaker, Ma said he would not accept the “1992 consensus” if it referred to the “one China” principle in 2006. Two years later, Ma said both sides should not engage in talks if Beijing insisted on the “one China” principle.
In 2010, Ma described the “1992 consensus” as the foundation for the resumption of bilateral talks and in November last year, the president said it meant that both sides insisted that there is only “one China,” but interpreted the context of their argument differently, the lawmaker said.
Taiwan has always refused to accept the “one China” principle and maintained that the “1992 consensus” only expressed that “each side verbally states its respective principles on ‘one China.’”
The most commonly used explanation of the consensus for the Taiwanese government has been “one China with different interpretations” (一中各表), while Beijing’s position was shortened as “respective expressions on the ‘one China’ principle” (各表一中).
“However, the message on Saturday showed that Ma has taken one step closer to Beijing’s ideology by abandoning the ‘different interpretations’ and upholding the ‘one China’ principle,” Gao said.
The inappropriate reply was likely an attempt to pave the way for a possible meeting between Ma and Xi, DPP Legislator Wu Ping-jui (吳秉叡) said.
However, it was dangerous that Ma has made such a decision on Taiwan’s future alone, without respecting the opinions of the 23 million Taiwanese, Wu said.
“I don’t see how the people of Taiwan could not be angry over a message that unilaterally dictated the direction of this country without their consent,” he said.
The US government has signed defense cooperation agreements with Japan and the Philippines to boost the deterrence capabilities of countries in the first island chain, a report by the National Security Bureau (NSB) showed. The main countries on the first island chain include the two nations and Taiwan. The bureau is to present the report at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The US military has deployed Typhon missile systems to Japan’s Yamaguchi Prefecture and Zambales province in the Philippines during their joint military exercises. It has also installed NMESIS anti-ship systems in Japan’s Okinawa
‘WIN-WIN’: The Philippines, and central and eastern European countries are important potential drone cooperation partners, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung said Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) in an interview published yesterday confirmed that there are joint ventures between Taiwan and Poland in the drone industry. Lin made the remark in an exclusive interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper). The government-backed Taiwan Excellence Drone International Business Opportunities Alliance and the Polish Chamber of Unmanned Systems on Wednesday last week signed a memorandum of understanding in Poland to develop a “non-China” supply chain for drones and work together on key technologies. Asked if Taiwan prioritized Poland among central and eastern European countries in drone collaboration, Lin
NO CONFIDENCE MOTION? The premier said that being toppled by the legislature for defending the Constitution would be a democratic badge of honor for him Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) yesterday announced that the Cabinet would not countersign the amendments to the local revenue-sharing law passed by the Legislative Yuan last month. Cho said the decision not to countersign the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) was made in accordance with the Constitution. “The decision aims to safeguard our Constitution,” he said. The Constitution stipulates the president shall, in accordance with law, promulgate laws and issue mandates with the countersignature of the head of the Executive Yuan, or with the countersignatures of both the head of the Executive Yuan and ministers or
CABINET APPROVAL: People seeking assisted reproduction must be assessed to determine whether they would be adequate parents, the planned changes say Proposed amendments to the Assisted Reproduction Act (人工生殖法) advanced yesterday by the Executive Yuan would grant married lesbian couples and single women access to legal assisted reproductive services. The proposed revisions are “based on the fundamental principle of respecting women’s reproductive autonomy,” Cabinet spokesperson Michelle Lee (李慧芝) quoted Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君), who presided over a Cabinet meeting earlier yesterday, as saying at the briefing. The draft amendment would be submitted to the legislature for review. The Ministry of Health and Welfare, which proposed the amendments, said that experts on children’s rights, gender equality, law and medicine attended cross-disciplinary meetings, adding that