Sat, Apr 27, 2013 - Page 1 News List

Referendum referred for second reading

‘DOOMED TO FAIL’:KMT lawmakers said the referendum proposal was phrased as neutral as possible, while DDP lawmakers said the proposal amounted to ‘game-fixing’

By Shih Hsiu-chuan  /  Staff reporter

Democratic Progressive Party legislators hold up signs calling for a halt to the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District in the legislature in Taipei yesterday, while Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng, center, tries to announce that their referendum proposal will be going directly through to a second reading.

Photo: Chu Pei-hsiung, Taipei Times

The government-backed referendum proposal to determine the fate of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Gongliao District (貢寮) yesterday cleared a hurdle in the legislature, paving the way for the plebiscite proposal to be passed in June.

In a 60 to 45 vote on the legislative floor yesterday evening, the proposal for a referendum on the question: “Do you agree that the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be halted and that it not become operational (你是否同意核四廠停止興建不得運轉)?” was referred directly for a second reading.

Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) said the proposal will not be scheduled for a second reading vote until a one-month negotiation period has been concluded.

Once the proposal passes the second and third reading, the referendum is to be held no sooner than one month and no later than six months, without being subject to a screening by the Executive Yuan’s Referendum Review Committee.

The proposal, initiated by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Ching-hua (李慶華), was voted on after 44 lawmakers took to the podium in turn, with each given a four-minute slot for debate.

“Now that we haven’t been able to settle in the legislature the issue which has already confounded the country for more than 20 years, it’s time for the public to make a decision,” KMT caucus whip Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池) said.

Lin said the proposal was as neutral as it could be to make a referendum on the issue possible.

“Whether you support the plant’s continued construction or not, you should all vote in favor of the proposal,” he said.

The opposition said the KMT’s referendum question proposal amounted to “game-fixing.”

Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) said the party was opposed to the way the question was phrased, and was against a referendum being held under the “bird cage” Referendum Act (公民投票法).

The DPP refers to the law as a “bird cage,” and says that the referendum system is so structurally flawed that any referendum is doomed to fail.

According to the law, a voter turnout of more than 50 percent, or about 9.15 million, is needed for a referendum to be deemed valid, and of those who voted, at least 50 percent must vote “yes” to the question for it to be passed.

Pan said the KMT phrased the question in a negative way to take advantage of structural flaws, one of which is that “people who do not participate in the referendum are counted as supporters of the plant.”

“If the plant is to be scrapped, the Referendum Act requires that 9.15 million people to cast ballots. A president doesn't need that many voters to get elected,” DPP Legislator Yeh Yi-jin (葉宜津) said.

Opposition lawmakers slammed the KMT administration over what they said was an “evasion of responsibility” on the issue.

“Lin Hung-chih just said that the legislature is not able to decide on the issue. Why can’t we? The KMT holds a majority in the legislature. If you [the KMT] support the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, do it in a way that is above-board. Why bother having a referendum?” DPP Legislator Pasuya Yao (姚文智) said.

Several KMT lawmakers said that putting the issue to a referendum is “the best way to end controversy.”

“I am not able to represent all my constituents, so we should leave the decision to the people,” KMT Legislator Liao Cheng-ching (廖正井) said.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top