Minister of Finance Christina Liu (劉憶如) offered to resign yesterday after a capital gains tax she enthusiastically proposed was rejected by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers at a meeting on Monday.
After meeting with Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) yesterday evening, she reiterated her intention to resign, but added that she would wait until the Executive Yuan finds a successor.
At 10:42pm, Executive Yuan spokesperson Hu Yu-wei (胡幼偉) told the press that Chen had not approved Liu’s resignation.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
During their brief meeting, Chen told Liu that he wanted her to continue to work on a proposal, merging the Executive Yuan’s version of the capital gains tax on securities transactions and the KMT lawmakers’ version, that would be acceptable to the KMT caucus, Hu said.
Hu quoted Chen as saying that Liu’s resignation was not an issue that needed to be discussed for the moment, adding that Chen put off the question of whether Liu should stay in the Cabinet or leave until after the tax issue is resolved.
Liu said in a statement yesterday afternoon that she had tendered her resignation to Chen due to a disagreement with a new version of the draft bill of a capital gains tax being proposed by KMT lawmakers.
“The [KMT] caucus has been making efforts in integrating a version of the proposal that could be accepted by most people,” Liu said. “However, this version did not meet with my own beliefs.”
The KMT caucus proposal was far from meeting her expectations of the ability-to-pay principle, because major earners in the stock market would not be required to pay a capital gains tax under this version, she said.
However, this did not mean the government has given up on its tax reform efforts, Liu said, adding she still hopes the integrated tax bill will be passed by the legislature as soon as possible so a new system for the securities capital gains tax could be launched.
Her offer of resignation came as a shock to the premier.
According to Hu, Chen learned the news at “about noon” when he was pre-occupied with other events outside the Executive Yuan and that Liu’s resignation letter, in a sealed envelope, had been delivered to Chen’s office at 11am.
At about 3:20pm, Hu told a press conference that Chen wanted to meet with Liu to “thoroughly exchange views about the two proposals.”
Chen did not believe that Liu would need to resign just because her proposed version of the tax bill was not accepted by KMT lawmakers, since “the issue was just part of the ministry’s work,” Hu said.
KMT lawmakers were also shocked by the news.
KMT Legislator Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池) said he was surprised to learn that Liu had offered to resign.
“I didn’t see signs of her opposing the revised proposal,” Lin said.
KMT Legislator Alex Fai (費鴻泰) said he was also shocked because some of the revisions were made based on her views.
“I don’t understand why what was fine with her yesterday wasn’t fine today,” Fai said.
Meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) said: “It’s inevitable for Liu to resign because her policy was rejected by her own party.”
The KMT caucus’ objection to the Executive Yuan’s proposal was like a slap in the face to Liu and the administration, Ker said.
The flip-flopping on policy also reflected a serious lack of communication and integration between the Presidential Office, the Executive Yuan and KMT lawmakers, he said.
While Liu tendered her resignation to defend her proposal, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) should offer an explanation on the issue, since Ma was the one who approved the proposal in the first place, DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) said, adding that the feud between the administration and the KMT caucus was a “de facto constitutional crisis.”
DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said Liu was hard-nosed in defending her own policy, while colleague Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) said Ma and Chen were the ones to be held accountable for the swirling controversy and instability.
However, DPP Legislator Hsueh Ling (薛凌) said Liu only had herself to blame in excluding foreign investors from the tax base and the failure to clearly explain the administrative costs and calculation of the proposed capital gains tax, which worsened the situation.
Taiwan Solidarity Union Legislator Lin Shih-chia (林世嘉) said her caucus would initiate a motion for the resignation of the entire Cabinet today.
People First Party (PFP) caucus whip Thomas Lee (李桐豪) said his caucus respected Liu’s decision, but maintained the amendments related to the capital gains tax should be withheld until further discussion.
This story has been updated since it was first published.
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
ECONOMIC BOOST: Should the more than 23 million people eligible for the NT$10,000 handouts spend them the same way as in 2023, GDP could rise 0.5 percent, an official said Universal cash handouts of NT$10,000 (US$330) are to be disbursed late next month at the earliest — including to permanent residents and foreign residents married to Taiwanese — pending legislative approval, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. The Executive Yuan yesterday approved the Special Act for Strengthening Economic, Social and National Security Resilience in Response to International Circumstances (因應國際情勢強化經濟社會及民生國安韌性特別條例). The NT$550 billion special budget includes NT$236 billion for the cash handouts, plus an additional NT$20 billion set aside as reserve funds, expected to be used to support industries. Handouts might begin one month after the bill is promulgated and would be completed within
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
The National Development Council (NDC) yesterday unveiled details of new regulations that ease restrictions on foreigners working or living in Taiwan, as part of a bid to attract skilled workers from abroad. The regulations, which could go into effect in the first quarter of next year, stem from amendments to the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) passed by lawmakers on Aug. 29. Students categorized as “overseas compatriots” would be allowed to stay and work in Taiwan in the two years after their graduation without obtaining additional permits, doing away with the evaluation process that is currently required,
RSS