Debate within the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) about the so-called “1992 consensus” began right after DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) loss in the presidential election and has continued throughout the Lunar New Year break, as the party tries to determine if it should fine-tune its China policy to appeal to voters, DPP politicians and analysts said.
The “1992 consensus” was seen as one of the crucial factors in the Jan. 14 presidential election, which gave President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) a second four-year term.
The “1992 consensus” is only a part of cross-strait relations and it did not directly contribute to the DPP’s loss in the election, former DPP legislator Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) said.
The DPP should not accept the fictional consensus simply because of the loss, because that would only lend legitimacy to the KMT stance on the matter, Lin said.
However, the party does need to reconsider its position on the “1992 consensus” after weighing gains and losses in the three areas of sovereignty, security and trade, Lin said.
As for the “Taiwan Consensus,” an initiative proposed by Tsai, Lin said that it stressed the democratic nature of the process, but was less detailed in its content, which was the voters’ main concern about it.
“Tsai could easily have said that the content of the ‘Taiwan consensus’ means ‘The Republic of China [ROC] is Taiwan and Taiwan is the ROC’ — one of her major statements in the campaign. I have no idea why she did not make the connection,” he said.
Former DPP legislator Kuo Cheng-liang (郭正亮) was among those who said the DPP should accept the “1992 consensus” to at least some extent or find ways to work around the consensus, since the DPP has yet to propose any solution for engaging China without the “1992 consensus.”
The DPP must change its stance on cross-strait affairs because both China and the US favor the KMT’s approach, as shown by their preference for Ma in the presidential election, Kuo said.
Kuo said the DPP should review its policy on Taiwanese independence, its tolerance for the “one China with different interpretations” framework and whether to replace a “Taiwan consensus” with a “constitutional consensus.”
The party could also interpret the “1992 consensus” as “a platform to set aside disputes, without any timetable” to foster possible dialogue with Beijing, he said.
Former vice president Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) also labeled the “Taiwan consensus” as “weak and vague,” saying that the DPP’s “1999 Resolution on Taiwan’s Future,” which defines Taiwan as a sovereign country separate from China, while acknowledging the ROC as the country’s formal title, would be better for explaining the party’s China policy.
Regardless of what the DPP’s plan to deal with the “1992 consensus” is, the election should not be interpreted as “a victory and Taiwanese people’s endorsement of the consensus,” Soochow University professor Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政) said.
The “1992 consensus” is too weak to sustain bilateral engagement over the next four years and Beijing could step up its pressure for political negotiations, Lo said.
Tsai has not made any comments on the matter since the election. She has pledged to submit a complete review of the election campaign to the party before March 1, when her resignation as party chair takes effect.
In his National Day Rally speech on Sunday, Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) quoted the Taiwanese song One Small Umbrella (一支小雨傘) to describe his nation’s situation. Wong’s use of such a song shows Singapore’s familiarity with Taiwan’s culture and is a perfect reflection of exchanges between the two nations, Representative to Singapore Tung Chen-yuan (童振源) said yesterday in a post on Facebook. Wong quoted the song, saying: “As the rain gets heavier, I will take care of you, and you,” in Mandarin, using it as a metaphor for Singaporeans coming together to face challenges. Other Singaporean politicians have also used Taiwanese songs
NORTHERN STRIKE: Taiwanese military personnel have been training ‘in strategic and tactical battle operations’ in Michigan, a former US diplomat said More than 500 Taiwanese troops participated in this year’s Northern Strike military exercise held at Lake Michigan by the US, a Pentagon-run news outlet reported yesterday. The Michigan National Guard-sponsored drill involved 7,500 military personnel from 36 nations and territories around the world, the Stars and Stripes said. This year’s edition of Northern Strike, which concluded on Sunday, simulated a war in the Indo-Pacific region in a departure from its traditional European focus, it said. The change indicated a greater shift in the US armed forces’ attention to a potential conflict in Asia, it added. Citing a briefing by a Michigan National Guard senior
CHIPMAKING INVESTMENT: J.W. Kuo told legislators that Department of Investment Review approval would be needed were Washington to seek a TSMC board seat Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) yesterday said he received information about a possible US government investment in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and an assessment of the possible effect on the firm requires further discussion. If the US were to invest in TSMC, the plan would need to be reviewed by the Department of Investment Review, Kuo told reporters ahead of a hearing of the legislature’s Economics Committee. Kuo’s remarks came after US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on Tuesday said that the US government is looking into the federal government taking equity stakes in computer chip manufacturers that
CLAMPING DOWN: At the preliminary stage on Jan. 1 next year, only core personnel of the military, the civil service and public schools would be subject to inspections Regular checks are to be conducted from next year to clamp down on military personnel, civil servants and public-school teachers with Chinese citizenship or Chinese household registration, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. Article 9-1 of the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) stipulates that Taiwanese who obtain Chinese household registration or a Chinese passport would be deprived of their Taiwanese citizenship and lose their right to work in the military, public service or public schools, it said. To identify and prevent the illegal employment of holders of Chinese ID cards or
RSS