A fine given to a reporter by the police for following a celebrity couple was determined to be constitutional yesterday. The ruling handed down by the Council of Grand Justices in the case that has been dubbed “Press Freedom Versus Individual Privacy” is expected to have a significant impact on the future of the nation’s media.
In 2008, Wang Wei-bao (王煒博), a reporter with the Chinese-language Apple Daily, was fined NT$1,500 (US$52) by police after following model Flora Sun (孫正華) and her husband, Miao Hua-pin (苗華斌) — the heir to the MiTAC (神通集團) fortune — over a period of two months.
Wang sometimes waited outside their residence, which the couple considered a form of harassment.
Photo: Wang Wei-min, Taipei Times
After the couple reported the matter to the authorities, police charged Wang with violating subparagraph 2 of Article 89 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法) and fined him NT$1,500.
Wang later requested a constitutional interpretation of the case, contending that the law and its application by the police violated press freedom.
However, in their ruling -yesterday, the Council of Grand Justices said the police’s enforcement of the law has been legitimate because the couple being followed were not of sufficient public interest to warrant Wang’s actions.
“Press freedom is not an absolute constitutional right,” Judicial Yuan Secretary-General Lin Ching-fang (林錦芳) said in response to the ruling.
“There was no legitimate reason in this case for the reporter to infringe on the inviolability of the person, even though the victims are public figures,” she said.
Lin said the Council of Grand Justices had decided that -subparagraph 2 of Article 89 of the Act, which stipulates that people who follow others without a reason and do not stop after being urged to do so can be fined a maximum of NT$3,000, is meant to protect an individual’s freedom of action and the privacy of an individual’s information.
Lin added that although Article 11 of the Constitution stipulates protections for press freedom, those protections were not unlimited. When media workers gather news relating to public affairs and public interests, and they need to follow people to investigate these matters, such actions might be tolerated, but when following people is unrelated to public affairs and they have been asked to stop, personal rights should be protected and it is constitutional that the police fine the followers, Lin said.
At a press conference held following the ruling, the Apple Daily yesterday lauded the Council of Grand Justices for upholding press freedom. However, it said it was disappointed at the overall interpretation as it felt the Council of Grand Justices had too narrowly defined the term “newsgathering.”
“We certainly think it’s something positive that the Grand Justices believe the freedom of the press should be protected and that closely following a person could be an acceptable behavior in news gathering,” said Yu Poh-hsiang (尤伯祥), an attorney representing the Apple Daily.
However, Yu said the overall interpretation was disappointing, as the Council of Grand Justices seems to believe that such an idea should only apply to news gathering that involves the public interest and a news event that is “newsworthy.”
Lin Ming-hsin (林明昕), another attorney representing the Apple Daily, said it should be up to the news reporter or media outlet to decide what is considered newsworthy.
He added that news gathering activities could be regulated, “but it should not be regulated by the Social Order Maintenance Act, which allows government institutions to decide whether a certain behavior is in violation of the law — the decision should be made by the court instead.”
Meanwhile, Ministry of the Interior official Liu Wen-shih (劉文仕), who represented the ministry in court, said via telephone that “the right to work should not be protected at the expense of other people’s freedom and happiness.”
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY CNA
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
STUMPED: KMT and TPP lawmakers approved a resolution to suspend the rate hike, which the government said was unavoidable in view of rising global energy costs The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday said it has a mandate to raise electricity prices as planned after the legislature passed a non-binding resolution along partisan lines to freeze rates. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers proposed the resolution to suspend the price hike, which passed by a 59-50 vote. The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) voted with the KMT. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT said the resolution is a mandate for the “immediate suspension of electricity price hikes” and for the Executive Yuan to review its energy policy and propose supplementary measures. A government-organized electricity price evaluation board in March
NOVEL METHODS: The PLA has adopted new approaches and recently conducted three combat readiness drills at night which included aircraft and ships, an official said Taiwan is monitoring China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) exercises for changes in their size or pattern as the nation prepares for president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20, National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) said yesterday. Tsai made the comment at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, in response to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Ting-yu’s (王定宇) questions. China continues to employ a carrot-and-stick approach, in which it applies pressure with “gray zone” tactics, while attempting to entice Taiwanese with perks, Tsai said. These actions aim to help Beijing look like it has
China is mischaracterizing UN Resolution 2758 for its own interests by conflating it with its “one China” principle, US Deputy Assistant Secretary for China and Taiwan Mark Lambert said on Monday. Speaking at a seminar held by the German Marshall Fund, Lambert called for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the international community at a time when China is increasingly misusing Resolution 2758. The resolution had a clear impact when it changed who occupied the China seat at the UN, Lambert said. “Today, however, the PRC [People’s Republic of China] increasingly mischaracterizes and misuses Resolution 2758 to serve its own interests,” Lambert said. “Beijing