Chiou Ho-shun (邱和順) exhausted his final appeal yesterday when the Supreme Court reaffirmed a death sentence for kidnapping and murdering a nine-year-old boy more than two decades ago.
The decision ends the nation’s longest-running legal battle, which saw the case shuffled back and forth between various courts, with allegations by judicial reform advocates that evidence was acquired through torture and forced confessions.
The Supreme Court yesterday ruled that Chiou, detained for most of his adult life, received a fair trial and deserved to die for his 1987 slaying of Lu Cheng (陸正), a boy that prosecutors said he kidnapped, dismembered and then threw in the ocean after a botched kidnapping.
Photo: Courtesy of Lu Cheng’s family
He was also found guilty of the separate robbery and murder of an insurance agent who had just won a lottery-like game popular at the time — receiving another death penalty verdict in the same ruling.
A spokesperson for his pro bono legal team, Lin Feng-jeng (林峰正), called the decision “unacceptable,” saying that the abrupt finding came before the court had time to finish reviewing new information provided by the defense.
“The Supreme Court used two months to affirm a controversial ruling from a lower court in a 23-year-old case. It’s too soon and we believe it to be completely unacceptable that a person’s life can be decided this way,” Lin said.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
However, the ruling cited overwhelming proof in support of the verdict, based on eyewitness accounts and other evidence.
Chiou and several accomplices are said to have kidnapped the nine-year-old boy when he was walking home from school on Dec. 21, 1987, in a case that dominated media headlines at the time. Prosecutors said Lu resisted the kidnap attempt by Chiou’s girlfriend and was killed after he bit Chiou’s finger.
Prosecutors said that when Lu’s parents later received a ransom note for NT$5 million (US$173,000), the boy was already dead, having been dumped off the coast of Hsinchu County after being dismembered. The boy’s parents paid NT$1 million to the captors.
After a tip-off in September the following year, police arrested three suspects, who quickly confessed to the kidnapping and also the separate murder of Ko Hung Yu-lan (柯洪玉蘭), the insurance agent. Chiou, in detention for another case at the time, was implicated as the head of the criminal ring.
Police eventually obtained confessions from 11 suspects, but as more details surfaced, -discrepancies emerged in their accounts, including contradictions on where the body was disposed of. Charges against most of the other suspects have since been dismissed.
Chiou, his girlfriend, Wu Shu-chen (吳淑貞), and Lin Kun-ming (林坤明) are the only defendants to have been found guilty. The Supreme Court yesterday also upheld 10 and 17-year sentences for Wu and Lin, in line with the High Court ruling.
Lawyers for Chiou and the two other defendants said the murder investigation into Lu’s killing was riddled with problems, including a lack of forensic evidence linking them to the crime. The murder weapon, body and clothes of the victim were never found and prosecutors have based their case on the confessions.
Two prosecutors and 10 police officers involved in the case were impeached by the Control Yuan more than a decade ago for using violence and threats to acquire speedy confessions — which were still accepted as evidence.
In administrative limbo for much of the past two decades, the Supreme Court in the past continuously refused to confirm the High Court death sentence, citing flaws in the process. The case, as a result, bounced between the two courts while Chiou was kept behind bars.
They would have been released by the middle of next year if the stalemate had kept up following passage of an act designed to speed up criminal proceedings by lawmakers last year. The Speedy Criminal Trials Act (刑事妥速審判法) sets a maximum detention period of eight years for accused murderers.
The three suspects’ 23-year detention without a final conviction has been often cited by judicial advocates as reason to pass the act, designed to free defendants in the event of indecision between courts.
However, Lin said those efforts could have backfired based on yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling, which will send Chiou to death row.
“Instead of providing a way out for suspects indefinitely detained, judges have apparently become more motivated to clear their docket before May next year, when the law comes into effect,” he said. “They’re eager to keep them behind bars.”
Lawyers for Chiou and two accomplices had previously expected that the Supreme Court would again order a re-trial of May’s High Court ruling, as the court had done 11 times in the past.
His legal team said their petitions would continue, although they did not know in what form.
Lu’s father, Lu Chin-te (陸晉德), was unavailable for comment as of press time.
According to staff at Lu Chin-te’s company, the Lu family are currently travelling in the UK and are probably unaware of the lastest ruling.
In a previous interview with the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister paper), however, Lu Chin-te said that “delayed justice is not justice,” adding the case, bogged down for so many years, had taken its toll on the family, body and soul.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY WANG CHING-YI
CALL FOR SUPPORT: President William Lai called on lawmakers across party lines to ensure the livelihood of Taiwanese and that national security is protected President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday called for bipartisan support for Taiwan’s investment in self-defense capabilities at the christening and launch of two coast guard vessels at CSBC Corp, Taiwan’s (台灣國際造船) shipyard in Kaohsiung. The Taipei (台北) is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels, and the Siraya (西拉雅) is the Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) first-ever ocean patrol vessel, the government said. The Taipei is the fourth and final ship of the Chiayi-class offshore patrol vessels with a displacement of about 4,000 tonnes, Lai said. This ship class was ordered as a result of former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) 2018
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS