The Taipei 228 Memorial Museum is reopening its doors to the public this morning after a 10-month renovation, but its efforts to reveal the truth of the 228 Incident met with challenges as pro--independence activists and family members of the incident’s victims yesterday accused the museum of glorifying the acts of the then-government and distorting the truth with its selection of documents.
The renovated interior design and the documents on display in the permanent exhibition, they said, turned the museum into a bright and beautiful hall that reflected little of the tragic event, and described the then-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime’s bloody crackdown on demonstrators in 1947 as the government’s exercise of authority.
“My grandfather disappeared shortly after participating in the investigation of the 228 Incident and asking the then-KMT government to stop killing innocent civilians. However, the exhibition said the then-government was trying to restore public order. I am stunned by such an interpretation of history,” said Lee Te-cheng (李德振), whose grandfather’s body was never found after he disappeared.
Touring the museum, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Taipei City Councilor Chien Yu-yen (簡余晏), former Academia Historica president Chang Yen-hsien (張炎憲) and former Taipei 228 Memorial Museum director Yeh Po-wen (葉博文) joined Lee in challenging the museum and the Taipei City Government, saying the government had demonstrated arrogance with its interpretation of history and had disrespected the victims and their families.
“What can our children learn about the tragic 228 Incident when all they see is a beautiful room filled with music, great photos of [former dictator] Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and documents that portray the demonstrators as mobs?” Chien said.
Chang said the museum displayed an official order from -Chiang from March 1947 that banned military from taking any revenge measures against civilians following the 228 Incident. However, two other valuable historical documents that showed Chiang ordering then-Taiwan governor Chen Yi (陳儀) to lead troops to Taiwan to handle the accident were not on display.
Yeh said the exhibition also failed to show the exact number of victims of the 228 Incident and failed to discuss Chiang’s responsibility and urged the museum to delay its reopening ceremony and rearrange its exhibit.
Hsieh Ying-tseng (謝英從), director of the Taipei 228 Memorial Museum, yesterday said the museum had included more documents in its exhibition after Chang and other family members of the 228 Incident victims made suggestions.
“The exhibition objectively shows how the incident happened, the then-government’s handling and the victims and their family members’ reactions via historical documents. We do not make any interpretations and we respect different voices,” he said.
According to Hsieh, the museum began the discussion about updating the exhibition in 2007, and invited history experts including National Chengchi University history professor Chen Fang-ming (陳芳明) and Hsu Hsueh-chi (許雪姬), head of Academia Historica’s Institute of Modern History, to discuss the contents of the exhibition.
The museum also held a three-month preview exhibition in 2009 to collect opinions on the exhibition, before closing the museum in April last year for renovation, he said.