Mon, Jan 31, 2011 - Page 1 News List

Talks on ECFA submission ongoing: MOEA

‘BEST TIMING’:The ECFA took effect on Sept. 12 last year, yet the government said it was still consulting Beijing on when to submit the trade document to the WTO

By Ko Shu-ling and J. Michael Cole  /  Staff Reporters

Taipei and Beijing are still negotiating the “best timing” to submit the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) document to the WTO, government officials said.

Chang Chun-fu (張俊福), deputy director of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ (MOEA) Bureau of Foreign Trade, said both sides had translated the document into English, but had yet to decide when to notify the global trade body on the content of the pact.

“We are taking all things into consideration, but there is no time limit,” he said, adding that some countries took years to complete the process.

Earlier last week, the bureau’s ECFA Task Force told the Taipei Times it “would notify the ECFA to the WTO pursuant to the WTO’s rules and procedures,” adding that “as a usual practice, we will consult the other signatory before making any RTA [regional trade agreement] notifications.”

“Therefore, regarding the ECFA notification, we will discuss it with China and notify the WTO in due course,” it said.

Chang said that while the WTO does not set a time limit for the submission, it was understood that two to three years was not acceptable.

As the two sides have only completed negotiations on the “early harvest” program, more agreements needed to be negotiated after the ECFA was signed, Chang said.

However, he denied that the two sides would wait until a subsequent agreement under the ECFA framework was completed before sending a notification to the WTO.

Bureau of Foreign Trade chief secretary Chiang Wen-juo (江文若) said this approach was a “higher-level” decision and that she was in no position to offer any comment.

On Dec. 14, 2006, the General Council of the WTO established, on a provisional basis, a transparency mechanism for all RTAs that provides for the early announcement of any RTA — such as the ECFA — and notification to the WTO. Member economies are to consider the notified RTAs on the basis of a factual presentation by the WTO Secretariat.

The Committee on Regional Trade Agreements considers RTAs falling under Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and, if applicable, Article V of the General Agreement on Trade in Services.

The US government has expressed concerns over the fact that the ECFA documents signed by Taiwan and China in June last year have yet to be submitted to the WTO as promised, especially after the ECFA came into force on Sept. 12 and its early harvest list on Jan. 1.

Asked to comment on whether it was unusual for an RTA to come into force prior to notification to the WTO, Razeen Sally, co-director of the Brussels-based European Centre for International Political Economy and an expert on the WTO and preferential trade agreements, said WTO rules on the matter were not strictly regulated.

“Relevant WTO rules [in GATT Article XXIV] are not that strong, but, more to the point, are weakly policed and often honored in the breach,” Sally said by e-mail. “So if what you say is the case [failure to notify of an RTA prior to its entry into force], it is not that unusual.”

Furthermore, Sally said that in its current form, the ECFA covered less than ordinary RTAs.

“As it stands, [the ECFA] probably does not pass muster with Article XXIV, as it is a very partial agreement, eliminating tariffs on much, much less than the 90 percent of goods trade that is the WTO standard,” he said.

This story has been viewed 5679 times.

Comments will be moderated. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned.

TOP top