US President Barack Obama formally ended the US combat mission in Iraq on Tuesday, declaring no victory after seven years of bloodshed, and telling Americans and the world: “It is time to turn the page.”
From the Oval Office, where former US president George W. Bush first announced the invasion that would come to define his presidency, Obama addressed millions who were divided over the war in his country and around the world.
Fiercely opposed to the war from the start, he said the US “has paid a huge price” to give Iraqis the chance to shape their future.
In a telling sign of the domestic troubles weighing on the US and his own presidency, Obama turned much of the emphasis in a major war address to the dire rate of US joblessness.
He said the Iraq war had stripped the US of money needed for its own prosperity, and he called for an economic commitment at home to rival the grit and purpose of a military campaign.
The speech, lasting slightly less than 20 minutes, was only his second address from the Oval Office.
Obama looked directly into the TV camera, hands clasped in front of him on his desk, family photos and the US and presidential flags behind him. His tone was somber.
Even as he tries to cap one of the most divisive chapters in recent US history, Obama is escalating the conflict in Afghanistan. He pledged anew that the US would keep up the fight in that war, the longest once since Vietnam.
In Iraq, for all the finality, the war is not over. More Americans probably will die. The country is plagued by violence and political instability, and Iraqis struggle with constant shortages of electricity and water.
Obama is keeping up to 50,000 troops in Iraq for support as well as counter-terrorism training, and the last forces are not due to leave until the end of next year at the latest. He took pains to thank troops for their sacrifice, but made it clear that he saw the moment more as a mistake ended than a mission accomplished.
He spoke of strained relations with allies, anger at home and a “huge price” of the highest order.
The toll includes more than 4,400 US troops dead and many more Iraqis, tens of thousands more Americans wounded and hundreds of billions of dollars spent.
To underscore his point of ending the divisiveness over Iraq, Obama said he had called Bush, whom he had taunted so often in the 2008 presidential campaign. He prominently praised the former Republican president in the heart of his speech.
“It’s well known that he and I disagreed about the war from its outset,” Obama said. “Yet no one could doubt President Bush’s support for our troops, or his love of country and commitment to our security.”
Obama pressed Iraq’s leaders, saying it was time to show some urgency and be accountable.
At once, Obama sought to assure Americans that the war was finally winding down, and yet also promise Iraq and those watching across the Middle East that the US was not simply walking away.
“Our combat mission is ending,” he said, “but our commitment to Iraq’s future is not.”
Almost forgotten is the intensity that defined the debate for much of the decade and drove people into streets in protest. Yet what grew out of the war was something broader: Bush’s doctrine of pre-emptive force against perceived threats.
Running for office, Obama said the war inflamed anti-American sentiments and undermined US standing in the world in addition to stealing the focus from Afghanistan. He mentioned it again on Tuesday.
“Indeed, one of the lessons of our effort in Iraq is that American influence around the world is not a function of military force alone,” he said.
Earlier in the day, at Fort Bliss, Texas, a post that has endured losses during the war, Obama tried to tell the military that all the work and bloodshed in Iraq was not in vain. He said that because of the US efforts in the Iraq war, “America is more secure.”
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2