Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) yesterday defended the government after a Cabinet document charting the country’s territorial waters made Kinmen and Matsu appear to be parts of China.
“For 10 years Kinmen and Matsu have been deliberately left out [of the country’s official territorial waters] … Over the last 10 years the issue hasn’t been reviewed,” Wu said, referring to a previous version of the map drawn up in 1999.
Asked whether the government had made a secret deal with China on the issue, Wu dismissed the idea.
“There was no secret deal … There must have been some reason why the situation has remained this way for the past 10 years. It hasn’t changed no matter whether the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] or the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] was in power,” Wu said.
Wu also said that Kinmen and Matsu not being included in the document’s boundary line was in line with the consensus on cross-strait relations — “to set aside disputes and create a win-win situation.”
“Kinmen and Matsu belong to Fujian Province … Although Kinmen and Matsu are under the Republic of China’s [ROC] jurisdiction, other parts of Fujian Province are under the jurisdiction of the mainland,” Wu said.
The furor came about after the Chinese-language Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) said the Executive Yuan last Wednesday promulgated the revised regulations on the boundaries of the country’s territorial waters following demarcations defined in 1999 that excluded the Diaoyutai (釣魚台) and Paracel (西沙) islands as well as Kinmen and Matsu.
Although the document was promulgated with Wu’s name on it, Wu told reporters yesterday that “I did not know about it until I read about it in [yesterday’s] newspapers.”
The notice shows the ROC’s territorial waters and contiguous areas extend from Taiwan proper and its immediate offshore islands to include the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) in the Pacific Ocean, the Dongsha Islands (or the Pratas Islands, 東沙島) and Chongsha Bank (or Macclesfield Bank, 中沙群島) in the South China Sea.
The scope of the country’s territorial waters remained the same as announced in 1999, the first time the government made the demarcation based on the ROC Territorial Waters and Neighboring Areas Act (中華民國領海及鄰近區法), which was passed a year earlier.
The Ministry of the Interior, which was in charge of drawing up the document, said the purpose of the revisions was merely a technical fine-tuning to adjust to revised nautical charts after the army replaced its original coordination system with the international coordinate system WGS 84.
Executive Yuan Spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) released a press statement saying the government never considered giving up Kinmen and Matsu.
Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) yesterday said that the administration must include Kinmen and Matsu in “the territory of Taiwan” because they are “Taiwan’s legitimate dominion.”
Wang said Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) told the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee yesterday morning that Kinmen and Matsu would be included in the country’s territorial map within a year.
“Our position is that we should consider Kinmen and Matsu as two regions under the legal rule of Taiwan,” he said.
Wang said they did not know why the sea line around the outlying islets of Kinmen and Matsu was not included in the country’s territory when the government first promulgated the charts in 1999, but noted that the former DPP administration did nothing to change it.
Wang said the two islets would be included the next time the map was drawn up.
Wang said that the Presidential Office or the National Security Council had not played any role in the matter, saying it was “an operation of the Ministry of the Interior.”
CONTINUED ON PAGE 3
When questioned by legislators at an Internal Administration Committee meeting yesterday, Jiang said the government would never give up Kinmen and Matsu and would soon declare the islands Taiwan’s marine territories.
“We have never changed our stance on Kinmen and Matsu — whether in terms of sovereignty or de facto jurisdiction [over the islands],” Jiang told the committee. “It didn’t when we declared our marine territories 10 years ago or … when another party was in power.”
“There is no doubt that Kinmen and Matsu are under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China. We will continue the project of measuring coastlines for basis of marine territorial claim,” Jiang said. “Results from the second phase of the project will be announced in a year.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Ching-hua (李慶華) urged the Executive Yuan to correct the nation’s boundaries.
“Aren’t we going to hold county chiefs elections for Kinmen and Matsu [next month]? How come [the government] did not include them within our territory? This is a very serious mistake and could result in serious problems afterwards,” Lee said.
KMT Legislator Shuai Hua-ming (帥化民) said the government should stipulate the inclusion of Kinmen and Matsu in the nation’s territory in a written document.
The DPP said that leaving the coastline around Matsu and Kinmen out of the country’s official territorial map set a dangerous precedent that would enable China to claim Taiwan as part of its territory.
“The government claimed that this was part of Taiwan’s effort to shelf differences in order to improve cross-strait ties. The problem is, Taiwan’s unilateral action to exclude Kinmen and Matsu’s sea territory will only ignite further conflict between the two sides,” said DPP Lawmaker Yeh Yi-ching (葉宜津), panning the administration for being China-centric while disregarding the livelihood of the Taiwanese, particularly those residing on the offshore islets.
DPP Kaoshiung City Councilor Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) said that Taiwan and Japan have had a longstanding feud over the Diaoyutais, but that difference of opinion had never deterred Taiwan from including the disputed island chain as part of ROC territory.
“If we are serious about shelving differences with all of our neighbors, then why not also abdicate our claims for the Diaoyutais or Spratly Islands?” Chao said.
Chao added that during the DPP era, the government launched several unofficial negotiations with Beijing on the direct cross-strait flight issue, but that none of the talks came to fruition because Taiwan insisted the flight must be routed either closer to Japan or the Philippines to make them appear international rather than domestic.
Chao said the KMT caved in to Chinese pressure when it came to power because it was too eager to start cross-strait direct flights, adding that the gesture, and alienating Kinmen and Matsu from the territorial map, could all become Beijing’s “evidence” to show the international community that Taiwan has agreed that it is part of China.
Questioned by legislators at an Internal Administration Committee meeting yesterday, Jiang said the government would never give up Kinmen and Matsu and would soon declare the islands Taiwan’s marine territories.
“We have never changed our stance on Kinmen and Matsu — whether in terms of sovereignty or de facto jurisdiction [over the islands],” Jiang told the committee. “It didn’t when we declared our marine territories 10 years ago … when another party was in power.”
“There is no doubt that Kinmen and Matsu are under the jurisdiction of the Republic of China. We will continue the project of measuring coastlines on the basis of marine territorial claim,” Jiang said. “Results from the second phase of the project will be announced in a year.”
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lee Ching-hua (李慶華) urged the Executive Yuan to rectify the nation’s boundaries.
“Aren’t we going to hold county chiefs elections for Kinmen and Matsu [next month]? How come [the government] did not include them within our territory? This is a very serious mistake and could result in serious problems afterwards,” Lee said.
KMT Legislator Shuai Hua-ming (帥化民) said the government should stipulate the inclusion of Kinmen and Matsu in the nation’s territory in a written document.
The DPP said that leaving the coastline around Matsu and Kinmen out of the country’s official territorial documents set a dangerous precedent that would enable China to claim Taiwan as part of its territory.
“The government claimed that this was part of Taiwan’s effort to shelve differences in order to improve cross-strait ties. The problem is, Taiwan’s unilateral action to exclude Kinmen and Matsu’s territorial waters will only ignite further conflict between the two sides,” said DPP Lawmaker Yeh Yi-ching (葉宜津), panning the administration for being China-centric while disregarding the livelihood of the Taiwanese, particularly those residing on the offshore islets.
DPP Kaoshiung City Councilor Chao Tien-lin (趙天麟) said that Taiwan and Japan have had a longstanding feud over the Diaoyutais, but that difference of opinion had never deterred Taiwan from including the disputed island chain as part of ROC territory.
“If we are serious about shelving differences with all of our neighbors, then why not also abdicate our claims for the Diaoyutais or Spratly Islands?” Chao said.
Chao added that during the DPP era, the government launched several unofficial negotiations with Beijing on the direct cross-strait flight issue, but that none of the talks came to fruition because Taiwan insisted flights must be routed either closer to Japan or the Philippines to make them appear international rather than domestic.
Chao said the KMT caved in to Chinese pressure after it came to power because it was too eager to start cross-strait direct flights, adding that the gesture, as well as leaving the territorial waters around Kinmen and Matsu out of official documents, could all become Beijing’s “evidence” to show the international community that Taiwan has agreed that it is part of China.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY JENNY W. HSU AND FLORA WANG
MAKING WAVES: China’s maritime militia could become a nontraditional threat in war, clogging up shipping lanes to prevent US or Japanese intervention, a report said About 1,900 Chinese ships flying flags of convenience and fishing vessels that participated in China’s military exercises around Taiwan last month and in January last year have been listed for monitoring, Coast Guard Administration (CGA) Deputy Director-General Hsieh Ching-chin (謝慶欽) said yesterday. Following amendments to the Commercial Port Act (商港法) and the Law of Ships (船舶法) last month, the CGA can designate possible berthing areas or deny ports of call for vessels suspected of loitering around areas where undersea cables can be accessed, Oceans Affairs Council Minister Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said. The list of suspected ships, originally 300, had risen to about
DAREDEVIL: Honnold said it had always been a dream of his to climb Taipei 101, while a Netflix producer said the skyscraper was ‘a real icon of this country’ US climber Alex Honnold yesterday took on Taiwan’s tallest building, becoming the first person to scale Taipei 101 without a rope, harness or safety net. Hundreds of spectators gathered at the base of the 101-story skyscraper to watch Honnold, 40, embark on his daredevil feat, which was also broadcast live on Netflix. Dressed in a red T-shirt and yellow custom-made climbing shoes, Honnold swiftly moved up the southeast face of the glass and steel building. At one point, he stepped onto a platform midway up to wave down at fans and onlookers who were taking photos. People watching from inside
Japan’s strategic alliance with the US would collapse if Tokyo were to turn away from a conflict in Taiwan, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday, but distanced herself from previous comments that suggested a possible military response in such an event. Takaichi expressed her latest views on a nationally broadcast TV program late on Monday, where an opposition party leader criticized her for igniting tensions with China with the earlier remarks. Ties between Japan and China have sunk to the worst level in years after Takaichi said in November that a hypothetical Chinese attack on Taiwan could bring about a Japanese
STREAMLINED: The dedicated funding would allow the US to transfer equipment to Taiwan when needed and order upgraded replacements for stockpiles, a source said The US House of Representatives on Thursday passed a defense appropriations bill totaling US$838.7 billion, of which US$1 billion is to be allocated to reinforcing security cooperation with Taiwan and US$150 million to replace defense articles provided to the nation. These are part of the Consolidated Appropriation Act, which the US House yesterday passed with 341 votes in favor and 88 against. The act must be passed by the US Senate before Friday next week to avoid another government shutdown. The US House Committee on Appropriations on Monday unveiled the act, saying that it allocates US$1 billion for the Taiwan Security Cooperation Initiative