Andy Hall, a British-born oil trader based outside New York, personally pocketed more than US$100 million last year. That was his reward for astutely predicting in 2003 that oil prices would soar toward US$200 a barrel. Just before prices hit US$147 in July last year however, Hall bailed out.
The 58-year-old ex-BP trader feared the consequences once Manhattan’s banks began crashing. Record oil prices, he foresaw, were tipping the world into recession. Yet, as oil tumbled toward US$32, the global economic crisis sparked Hall’s appetite for more profits. Eagerly, he began speculating in New York and London that prices would eventually boomerang back toward US$200.
So far they are hovering around US$70, but Hall is convinced that once the recovery begins and the demand for oil increases, oil prices and his profits will rocket up again.
Named by rivals as the “God of oil traders,” Hall is an enigmatic, quietly spoken art collector who, while shunning the spotlight, abides by the adage: “Oil traders work in a whorehouse so don’t try to be an angel in this business.”
In gearing up for another coup, Hall acknowledges that over the years he has attracted both praise and loathing for perfecting the “squeeze” — causing oil prices to change.
“I’m basically interested in one thing — business,” he said. “I come in every day to make money.”
Producing sufficient oil would keep prices down and sustain the world’s economic recovery but that scenario offends both Hall and some oil producers. Their scenario for frenzied markets is based upon an unholy alliance, although they disagree about why prices will rise.
Hall is an “oil-peakist.” Supplies, he believes, have passed their peak and the world is running out of supplies. The major oil producers — like Saudi Arabia, Russia, Venezuela and the US — know the opposite. Unlike the oil-peakists’ estimate that the world’s total oil reserves were about 2 trillion barrels and we have consumed more than half, the producers estimate that up to 11 trillion barrels remain under the earth’s surface.
New technologies to extract oil from beneath the sea and to suck more oil from old wells repeatedly smash the oil-peakists’ doomladen message. Yet, despite this, some reputable international oil think tanks predict an imminent oil shortage and prices again heading towards US$200. That forecast is mood music for Hall and is welcomed by some oil producers.
Russia and Venezuela stand to pocket billions of dollars once oil prices return to last year’s dizzy heights. They want to earn more money from less oil. The risk of plunging the world back into recession barely figures in their calculations, and their conspiracy is aided by the folly of major Western oil companies.
Insensitive and condescending, BP, Shell, ExxonMobil and the other giants that dominate the sale of gasoline in the high street have been reduced to minnows. Thirty-five years ago, the so-called “seven sisters” controlled about 80 percent of the world’s oil supplies. Now the remaining five major oil companies control barely 5 percent. Since 1945, the oil companies successively failed to gain the trust of the leaders of most of the oil-producing states and secure access to their oil fields. Nationalism, self-interest and stupidity barred the oil companies. The conundrum is fatal. By denying themselves the oil companies’ efficient management and technology, Russia, Venezuela and Mexico are now producing less oil than 10 years ago — although all three need the extra revenue.
By strangling supplies, those governments will hope to earn bigger profits by producing less oil. Producing oil in those traditional countries costs between US$3 and US$9 a barrel and, the governments hope, will sell for more than US$100. Impatient with the lengthy timescale involved in producing new oil, those politicians contemplate permanent high prices. Hall and his rival oil traders gleefully wait.
“Greed” will not be discussed at next week’s Oil & Money conference in London. Not surprisingly, the agenda of the annual extravaganza, which attracts 1,000 of the world’s most influential oil aficionados, circumvents the embarrassment that corrupt and inefficient national oil companies are allowing exploration and production to diminish. Confusion will stifle rational argument.
Investment in new fields is low and the rapacious encroachment by China into the West’s traditional territories, especially in Africa, has created new instability. In Nigeria, Ghana and Angola, the Chinese are outbidding Western oil companies for access to oil fields. Once the recovery begins, Chinese demand will accelerate price rises, guaranteeing another financial killing for Hall.
Leadership and consensus could solve these problems, but competition between producers, oil companies, governments and traders is preventing anyone thinking beyond profits.
“We’re not here to help others,” Hall once said.
Either world leaders agree to squeeze more oil out of the rocks or traders will exploit shortages to squeeze the markets.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from