The US House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific has amended and watered down a resolution offering strong support for Taiwan on the 30th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
It has angered some members of the subcommittee and Congressional sources said that it came as a result of direct pressure from Beijing.
Subcommittee chairman Eni Faleomavaega, a Democrat from American Samoa, who was chiefly responsible for changing the wording of the resolution, admitted later that he had experienced pressure “from both sides.”
He said that “things get very emotional” around the Taiwan issue and that the resolution as amended was more appropriate.
“It is better for the people of Taiwan,” he said.
Introducing his amended resolution, Faleomavaega said that the future of Taiwan was “for people on both sides of the Strait to resolve.”
Analysts said later that there appeared to be three substantive changes to the resolution, which now goes before the Committee on Foreign Affairs before being presented for full House approval.
The original resolution, as proposed by 18 members of the House, said it was the policy of the US to provide defense articles and defense services “in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.”
But the new version replaces that language with “it is the policy of the US to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character to maintain the capacity to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion.”
The reference to quantity was removed.
The original resolution also said that the relationship between the US and Taiwan had been strengthened with “the development of Taiwan’s robust free-market economy, with Taiwan becoming the ninth largest trading partner of the US in 2007 and imports from the US in that year totaling over US$26 billion.”
Faleomavaega shortened that statement to say relations had been strengthened with “the development of Taiwan’s robust free-market economy.”
The original, more detailed wording was designed to help efforts to push through a free-trade agreement with Taiwan.
Subcommittee member Edward Royce, a California Republican Representative, said: “While this resolution highlights many of the positive attributes of the US-Taiwan relationship, language detailing our important economic relationship was regrettably struck from the introduced text.”
“The truth is that trade is very important to Taiwanese security. Security isn’t based on weapons alone. It may be wishful thinking with this administration and Congress, but I’d like to see movement on a free-trade agreement with Taiwan. Certainly, if we throw up trade barriers, it would do much to destabilize Taiwan’s economy. Let’s not give trade short shrift,” he said.
Faleomavaega said later that he did not think the time was right for a free-trade agreement with Taiwan.
The third point, which concerns pro-Taiwan interests in Washington, comes in the interpretation of a single word.
The original resolution said that Congress “reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act as the cornerstone of United States relations with Taiwan.”
But Faleomavaega’s version reads that the TRA is simply “vital to relations between the US and Taiwan.”
Coen Blaauw, executive director of the Formosan Association for Public Relations (FAPA), said: “Replacing ‘cornerstone’ with ‘vital’ is a big step in the wrong direction.”
“The changes have certainly weakened the resolution and they benefit the Chinese position. China does not want the TRA to be seen as the cornerstone of US-Taiwan relations,” Blaauw said.
In a message to members of the full committee, Blaauw said: “Maybe there is some political thing going on in Faleomavaega’s subcommittee and hopefully in the full Committee mark-up next week someone can bring the earlier language back, but the new text is really not good.”
“The reason why we at FAPA coined the phrase ‘cornerstone of US-Taiwan relations’ is, of course, because the Chinese always insist that the Three Joint US-China communiques are the cornerstone of the US-Taiwan-PRC triangular relationship. You know why: Because in the communiques the US acknowledges the Chinese position that Taiwan is part of China. The people of Taiwan had zero say in the conclusion of these three detrimental-to-Taiwan communiques,” he said.
In a press statement, TECRO in Washington put a brave face on the situation and said: “This resolution reaffirms the US’ unwavering commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act, reaffirms US support for Taiwan’s democratic institutions and supports the strong and deepening relationship between the US and Taiwan.”
“As the 30th anniversary of the enactment of the TRA draws near, the action by the US Congress today clearly demonstrates the friendly and close relationship between Taiwan and the US,” it said.
AGING: As of last month, people aged 65 or older accounted for 20.06 percent of the total population and the number of couples who got married fell by 18,685 from 2024 Taiwan has surpassed South Korea as the country least willing to have children, with an annual crude birthrate of 4.62 per 1,000 people, Ministry of the Interior data showed yesterday. The nation was previously ranked the second-lowest country in terms of total fertility rate, or the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime. However, South Korea’s fertility rate began to recover from 2023, with total fertility rate rising from 0.72 and estimated to reach 0.82 to 0.85 by last year, and the crude birthrate projected at 6.7 per 1,000 people. Japan’s crude birthrate was projected to fall below six,
US President Donald Trump in an interview with the New York Times published on Thursday said that “it’s up to” Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) what China does on Taiwan, but that he would be “very unhappy” with a change in the “status quo.” “He [Xi] considers it to be a part of China, and that’s up to him what he’s going to be doing, but I’ve expressed to him that I would be very unhappy if he did that, and I don’t think he’ll do that. I hope he doesn’t do that,” Trump said. Trump made the comments in the context
SELF-DEFENSE: Tokyo has accelerated its spending goal and its defense minister said the nation needs to discuss whether it should develop nuclear-powered submarines China is ramping up objections to what it sees as Japan’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons, despite Tokyo’s longstanding renunciation of such arms, deepening another fissure in the two neighbors’ increasingly tense ties. In what appears to be a concerted effort, China’s foreign and defense ministries issued statements on Thursday condemning alleged remilitarism efforts by Tokyo. The remarks came as two of the country’s top think tanks jointly issued a 29-page report framing actions by “right-wing forces” in Japan as posing a “serious threat” to world peace. While that report did not define “right-wing forces,” the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was
PREPAREDNESS: Given the difficulty of importing ammunition during wartime, the Ministry of National Defense said it would prioritize ‘coproduction’ partnerships A newly formed unit of the Marine Corps tasked with land-based security operations has recently replaced its aging, domestically produced rifles with more advanced, US-made M4A1 rifles, a source said yesterday. The unnamed source familiar with the matter said the First Security Battalion of the Marine Corps’ Air Defense and Base Guard Group has replaced its older T65K2 rifles, which have been in service since the late 1980s, with the newly received M4A1s. The source did not say exactly when the upgrade took place or how many M4A1s were issued to the battalion. The confirmation came after Chinese-language media reported
RSS