The US House Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific has amended and watered down a resolution offering strong support for Taiwan on the 30th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).
It has angered some members of the subcommittee and Congressional sources said that it came as a result of direct pressure from Beijing.
Subcommittee chairman Eni Faleomavaega, a Democrat from American Samoa, who was chiefly responsible for changing the wording of the resolution, admitted later that he had experienced pressure “from both sides.”
He said that “things get very emotional” around the Taiwan issue and that the resolution as amended was more appropriate.
“It is better for the people of Taiwan,” he said.
Introducing his amended resolution, Faleomavaega said that the future of Taiwan was “for people on both sides of the Strait to resolve.”
Analysts said later that there appeared to be three substantive changes to the resolution, which now goes before the Committee on Foreign Affairs before being presented for full House approval.
The original resolution, as proposed by 18 members of the House, said it was the policy of the US to provide defense articles and defense services “in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.”
But the new version replaces that language with “it is the policy of the US to provide Taiwan with arms of a defensive character to maintain the capacity to resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion.”
The reference to quantity was removed.
The original resolution also said that the relationship between the US and Taiwan had been strengthened with “the development of Taiwan’s robust free-market economy, with Taiwan becoming the ninth largest trading partner of the US in 2007 and imports from the US in that year totaling over US$26 billion.”
Faleomavaega shortened that statement to say relations had been strengthened with “the development of Taiwan’s robust free-market economy.”
The original, more detailed wording was designed to help efforts to push through a free-trade agreement with Taiwan.
Subcommittee member Edward Royce, a California Republican Representative, said: “While this resolution highlights many of the positive attributes of the US-Taiwan relationship, language detailing our important economic relationship was regrettably struck from the introduced text.”
“The truth is that trade is very important to Taiwanese security. Security isn’t based on weapons alone. It may be wishful thinking with this administration and Congress, but I’d like to see movement on a free-trade agreement with Taiwan. Certainly, if we throw up trade barriers, it would do much to destabilize Taiwan’s economy. Let’s not give trade short shrift,” he said.
Faleomavaega said later that he did not think the time was right for a free-trade agreement with Taiwan.
The third point, which concerns pro-Taiwan interests in Washington, comes in the interpretation of a single word.
The original resolution said that Congress “reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the Taiwan Relations Act as the cornerstone of United States relations with Taiwan.”
But Faleomavaega’s version reads that the TRA is simply “vital to relations between the US and Taiwan.”
Coen Blaauw, executive director of the Formosan Association for Public Relations (FAPA), said: “Replacing ‘cornerstone’ with ‘vital’ is a big step in the wrong direction.”
RSS