The Supreme Court yesterday upheld the Taiwan High Court’s not guilty verdict for president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), rejecting charges that he misused his special allowance during his eight-year tenure as Taipei mayor.
The Supreme Court’s verdict is final.
“The prosecutors’ reasons for appeal were not solid. There was insufficient evidence for a guilty verdict. As a result, we decided to uphold the Taiwan High Court’s verdict,” Chang Chun-tsung (張淳淙), spokesman for the Supreme Court’s Criminal Department, told a press conference yesterday afternoon.
In addition to dropping the charges against Ma, Supreme Court judges also upheld the Taiwan High Court’s guilty verdict and one-year prison sentence for Yu Wen (余文), Ma’s secretary.
Chang said the prosecutors’ appeal was received on Jan. 30. Judges reviewed the appeal and ruled that the Taiwan High Court’s verdict should stand, as the appeal was not persuasive.
“Basically, judges believe that this case was the result of human error made by Yu and had nothing to do with Ma. That is why Yu’s sentence was upheld,” Chang said.
Ma’s spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) said Ma was calm when he learned about the verdict and had been confident that the court would uphold the not guilty verdict.
Lo said Ma turned on the TV at about 3:20pm to hear the verdict, before carrying on with his normal schedule.
Asked whether the verdict would have bearing on similar cases in the future, Lo said that it would probably influence the judicial system.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislative caucus issued an immediate response to the verdict, with DPP legislative caucus whip William Lai (賴清德) saying he was sorry, but not surprised.
“He [Ma] should know better than anyone else,” Lai said. “He is innocent in the eyes of the law, but it does not necessarily mean that he is clean.”
Lai said he was not surprised because Ma was president-elect and he did not believe the Supreme Court would pass a guilty verdict against an incoming president. He said Ma should have received punishment instead of Yu, because Yu was merely helping Ma.
“He [Ma] will enjoy immunity during his presidency, but I believe that an increasing number of legal experts will continue to scrutinize this case in the future to determine whether our new president is really clean,” Lai said.
When asked for comment, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) urged the DPP to stop focusing on the case now that it was over.
“His innocence has been confirmed,” Lai Shyh-bao said, calling William Lai’s remark an attempt to incite “political persecution” against Ma.
Lai Shyh-bao also urged prosecutor Eric Chen (陳瑞仁) to handle President Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) “state affairs fund” case and other special allowance cases using the same standards he applied to Ma’s case.
The case began on Feb. 13 last year, when the Special Investigation Panel of the Taiwan High Court Prosecutors’ Office indicted Ma and Yu on charges of corruption.
Prosecutors said that with Yu’s help, Ma embezzled more than NT$12 million (US$400,000) from his special allowance fund during his eight-year term as Taipei mayor.
Ma stepped down as chairman of the KMT and announced his bid for the presidency on the day of his indictment.
DONATIONS
Prosecutors discovered that Ma had donated more than NT$11 million to various charities during the same period.
Yu conceded that he had forged receipts to apply for funds for Ma.
The Taipei District Court handed down the first verdict on Aug. 14.
The judges said Ma had not illegally pocketed his special allowance money.
Yu, however, was sentenced to 14 months in prison. Prosecutors appealed for the first time on Aug. 29.
UPHELD
On Dec. 28, the Taiwan High Court upheld the district court’s verdict, saying that Ma had only spent the money on necessary expenses.
Yu’s sentence was reduced to one year in jail. Prosecutors appealed on Jan. 9.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih and Flora Wang
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is