Fri, Aug 31, 2007 page1

• US balks at using `ray gun' in Iraq

  RIOT CONTROL Fearing it could be seen as a torture device, the Pentagon has refused to deploy a device that makes people feel as though their skin is on fire

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  US commanders in Iraq have told Washington that many civilian casualties could be avoided by using a new nonlethal weapon developed over the past decade, internal military correspondence obtained by The Associated Press shows.

  Military leaders repeatedly and urgently requested the device. It uses energy beams instead of bullets and lets soldiers break up unruly crowds without firing a shot.

  It is a ray gun that neither kills nor maims, but the Pentagon has refused to deploy it because of the possibility that the weapon might be seen as a torture device.

  Perched on a Humvee or a flatbed truck, the Active Denial System gives people hit by the invisible beam the sense that their skin is on fire. They are supposed to move out of the way quickly and without injury.

  On April 30, 2003, two days after the first violent protest in Fallujah, Gene McCall, then the top scientist at Air Force Space Command in Colorado, typed out a two-sentence e-mail to General Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

  "I am convinced that the tragedy at Fallujah would not have occurred if an Active Denial System had been there," McCall told Myers, according to the e-mail obtained by AP.

  The system should become "an immediate priority," McCall said.

  The general referred McCall's message to his staff, according to the e-mail chain.

  McCall, who retired from government in November 2003, remains convinced the system would have saved lives in Iraq.

  "How this has been handled is kind of a national scandal," McCall said by telephone.

  A few months after McCall's message, in August 2003, Richard Natonski, a Marine Corps brigadier general who had just returned from Iraq, filed an "urgent" request with officials in Washington for the energy-beam device.

  The device would minimize what Natonski described as the "CNN Effect": the instantaneous relay of images that depict US troops as aggressors.

  A year later, Natonski again asked for the system, saying a compact and mobile version was "urgently needed."

  Natonski, now a three-star general, is the Marine Corps' deputy commandant for plans, policies and operations. He did not respond to an interview request.

  Senior officers in Iraq have continued to make the case. One request in December last year said that as US forces are drawn down, the nonlethal weapon "will provide excellent means for economy of force."

  The main reason the tool has been missing in action is public perception. With memories of the 2004 Abu Ghraib prison scandal still fresh, the Pentagon is reluctant to give troops a space-age device that could be misconstrued as a torture machine.

  "We want to just make sure that all the conditions are right, so when it is able to be deployed the system performs as predicted -- that there isn't any negative fallout," said Colonel Kirk Hymes, head of the Defense Department's Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate.

  Reviews by military lawyers concluded it is a lawful weapon under current rules governing the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to a Nov. 15 document prepared by Marine Corps officials in western Iraq.

  Private organizations remain concerned, however, because documentation that supports the testing and legal reviews is classified. There's no way to independently verify the Pentagon's claims, Stephen Goose of Human Rights Watch in Washington said.

  "We think that any time you have an emerging technology that's based on novel physical principles, that this deserves the highest level of scrutiny," Goose said. "And we really haven't had that."

  Another issue for the weapon is cost.

  The Pentagon has spent US$62 million developing and testing the system over the past decade, a scant amount compared to other high-profile, multibillion-dollar military programs.

  Still, officials say the technology is too expensive, although they will not say what it costs to build. They cite engineering challenges as another obstacle, although one US defense contractor says it has a model ready for production.

  For now, there is no firm schedule for when the system might be made and delivered to troops.

  Commanders in Iraq say the go-slow approach has had devastating consequences.

  There is no way to calculate how many civilian deaths could have been avoided had the energy beam been available in Iraq. The bulk of the civilian casualties are due to sectarian warfare.

  According to Associated Press statistics, more than 27,400 Iraqi civilians have been killed and more than 31,000 wounded in war-related violence just since the new government took office in April 2005.

  The Active Denial System is a directed-energy device, although it is not a laser or a microwave. It uses a large, dish-shaped antenna and a long, V-shaped arm to send an invisible beam of waves to a target as far away as 450m.

  With the unit mounted on the back of a vehicle, US troops can operate a safe distance from rocks, fire bombs and small-arms fire.

  The beam penetrates the skin slightly, just enough to cause intense pain. The beam goes through clothing as well as windows, but can be blocked by thicker materials, such as metal or concrete.

  The system was developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory in New Mexico. During more than 12 years of testing, only two injuries requiring medical attention have been reported; both were second-degree burns, according to the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate Web site.

  Prototype units have been assembled by the military, the most promising being a larger model that sits on the back of a flatbed truck. This single unit, known as System 2, could be sent to Iraq as early as next year, according to Hymes of the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate.

  Hymes' office, which nurtures promising technologies that can be used by the military branches, plans to spend US$9 million over the next two years on the effort.

  Money for additional systems is not likely to be available until 2010, when an Air Force command in Massachusetts is expected to take control of the program, he said.

  Recognizing the potential market, defense contractor Raytheon has invested its own money to build a version that the company calls "Silent Guardian." Although Hymes said the Raytheon product "is not ready yet," company representatives say it is.

  Mike Booen, Raytheon's vice president for directed energy programs, said the company has produced one system that is available immediately.

  "We have the capacity to build additional systems as needed," he said.

  Raytheon has not sold any Silent Guardians to US or foreign customers, and Booen would not discuss the product's price.

  US commanders in Iraq have already asked to buy Raytheon's device.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Alcaraz, Sinner win their Roland Garros openers

  • 2

    Alcaraz struggles to 4th round in Paris

  • 3

    Blackpink to hold concert in Kaohsiung

  • 4

    Conte’s future uncertain even after Serie A title win

  • 5

    Panthers secure return to Stanley Cup Finals