Three of the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) presidential hopefuls took part in a TV debate yesterday, where they each emphasized the importance of Taiwanese consciousness and criticized their common enemy, former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
The three-hour debate was organized by the pro-independence Taiwan Society and was held in Neihu yesterday afternoon.
President Chen Shui-bian (
PHOTO: FANG PIN-CHAO, TAIPEI TIMES
Saying next year will be critical for the DPP and the country, DPP Chairman Yu Shyi-kun said that Taiwan must become a normal country and only the "Taiwan path" can guarantee the country's sustainable development.
"Taiwan and China are two different countries on either side of the Taiwan Strait," Yu said. "If I am elected president, I will not be bound to the `four noes and one without' pledge."
Chen made the pledge during his first inaugural speech in 2000. The pledge states that as long as China does not use military force against Taiwan, Chen promised that he would not declare independence, hold referendums on the nation's statehood, seek constitutional change, changes to national symbols, nor seek to abolish the National Unification Council and the unification guidelines.
Yu said that Taiwan must become a normal country, but it has been undermined by China's intimidation, the national identification issue and partisan feuding.
Admitting he was not an eloquent speaker, Yu said that the best national leader must organize a professional team to run the country, have a clear vision of the nation's future and act on what they promise.
Although he has consistently polled poorly compared to his rivals, Yu said he doubted the accuracy of the polls.
Former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) emphasized the importance of reinforcing Taiwanese consciousness because he said it helps to push the name change campaign and constitutional reform. Hsieh, who has been harshly criticized for his theory of "a constitutional one China" (憲法一中), said that the essence of his theory was to get rid of "one China" in the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution and he realized it would be a time-consuming task.
Until the ROC Constitution is amended, Hsieh said the DPP administration must acknowledge the ROC Constitution, which is seriously flawed.
As long as opposition parties or China identify with Taiwan, Hsieh said Taiwan should be willing to co-exist with them.
Hsieh, a co-founder of the DPP's now disbanded Welfare State faction, stressed what he called the "four priorities." They are: "Taiwan first, the environment first, culture first and the underprivileged first."
Hsieh criticized Ma's "new four wants," saying that he sounded as if he was running for city mayor or governor of a special administrative region.
Ma's wants refer to: the people "want to eat, want to work, want good education and want social order."
Hsieh proposed deepening the nation's democracy and strengthening Taiwanese consciousness in a bid to reach the goal of constitutional reform.
Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) called for unity and the continuation of Taiwanese political power, saying that a divided country and a split political party would be powerless.
Saying Taiwan was an independent sovereignty and its constitutional name is the Republic of China, Su underlined the importance of Taiwan consciousness and supported the writing of a constitution that is suitable, viable and relevant to the needs of Taiwan's people.
Facing criticism from Yu that he had tried to team up with Ma to try to force Chen out of office at the height of last year's anti-Chen campaign, Su said it was untrue and that he did not meet Ma to discuss the matter.
The second half of yesterday's debate began with a question from Soochow University professor Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政), who asked how the three DPP candidates proposed to deal with the issue of Chen's "four noes and one without" promise to the US.
Yu said that the Taiwanese people's future and the nation's legal rights cannot be limited by any agreement or promise made with a foreign country.
"I think the issue is an internal one and only the Taiwanese people have the right to decide their own future," Yu said. "I believe that as long as the final decision is done using democratic mechanisms, it will definitely win support from the majority."
Hsieh said that the president's "four noes, one without" promise to the US had been made under political pressure and was therefore understandable.
However, like Yu, he said he would not make any deal with a foreign country without first obtaining the endorsement of the Taiwanese people, while he would also do his best to maintain friendly relationships with Taiwan's allies.
"After the `four noes, one without' promise was made, the US did not give us more space to survive in the international community. China will never recognize us as an entity," Hsieh said.
Su's remarks echoed those of Yu and Hsieh. He said that the decision to agree to such a promise must be based on a decision made by all Taiwanese people.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is