The US is still powerful enough to shape an agenda for international activity but too weak to implement it globally as it faces uncertain prospects in Iraq, an escalating confrontation over Iran's nuclear ambitions and a robust challenge to its military hegemony from an increasingly assertive China, argues a new report, The Military Balance 2007, by a leading UK think tank.
An annual survey of the international military scene produces a picture of a messy "nonpolar" world rather than the "unipolar" or "multipolar" world often described as having emerged since the late 1980s, said John Chipman, director-general of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).
Others, whether rival states or key "non-state actors," such as Lebanon's Hezbollah, are now "strong enough to resist a US agenda but too weak to shape an internationally attractive alternative or to implement an enduring local agenda free of outside influence," he suggested.
Traditional military thinking needs to adjust further to the "complex battlefield" of the 21st century.
Neither in Iraq nor Afghanistan had there been adequate planning for post-conflict problems or nation-building after the "highly successful" combat phase, the IISS report says. In both cases there had been over-reliance on technology at the expense of vital human intelligence.
IRAQ
The biggest ongoing test of US power is in Iraq, where US President George W. Bush is trying his last-ditch "surge" strategy.
"Simply flooding one area ... in this case Baghdad, with troops, neglects the subtler aspects of counter-insurgency doctrine," Chipman warned of the "clear, hold and build" approach.
For a surge of troops to be sustainable it needs a follow-up process of reconstituting security, building an administrative capacity and establishing the rule of law.
"The Americans are good at clearing but the problem has been in holding, and then allowing through holding to build," said the IISS director of studies, Patrick Cronin, rating the chances of US success in Iraq at just 40 percent.
Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki would have to remove large numbers of ineffective Cabinet ministers to strengthen his own position. But he lacks the political power for such a bold move, Chipman said. The institutions of the state, especially the Iraqi army, are not strong enough.
IRAN
The IISS estimates that Iran is still two to three years away from being able to produce 25kg of highly enriched uranium, enough for one nuclear weapon. But if it overcomes technical hurdles the military options will increase, though sanctions do appear to be having an impact on Tehran.
"As Iran nears the point at which it masters enrichment and production capability there will be increasing pressure to prevent it from reaching a weapons capability," IISS proliferation expert Mark Fitzpatrick said.
"I don't think Washington is giving up on diplomacy but as the year goes on that pressure will increase," Fitzpatrick said.
Israel has also warned that it would not accept a nuclear-armed Iran.
"Iran's sense of its own power has been steadily heightened as US influence in the Middle East is challenged and in response to disunity in the international community on how to deal with Tehran's pursuit of its nuclear ambitions," the report says.
AFGHANISTAN
NATO member states face a "stamina" problem in Afghanistan, the IISS said, though there are grounds for optimism despite a resurgent Taliban and difficulties with Pakistan.
"NATO will have to stay for a long time to allow stability, which then allows reconstruction," said Colonel Christopher Langton, editor of the 450-page report.
Security problems in Afghanistan are complicated by a weak police force as well as the issue of the eradication of the poppy crop.
"The removal of farmers' livelihoods, with no significant incentive or replacement livelihood program runs counter to efforts to win `hearts and minds' in many areas," the report said.
"The Taliban capitalize on this contradiction by championing the case of the farmers ... protecting those who profit from the opium and heroin trade," it said.
NORTH KOREA
Movement on North Korea's nuclear program could come as a result of new flexibility in US negotiating tactics, Chipman predicted.
Pyongyang has floated the prospect of halting its production and reprocessing of uranium, of which it now has enough for up to 10 weapons, and though it is unlikely to surrender them, "there is fresher life to the negotiating pace than might have been anticipated."
Any North Korean nuclear cooperation with Iran -- as distinct from the supply of ballistic missile technology -- would be a "red line" for the US.
CHINA
Beijing's declared 14.7 percent increase in military spending last year brought a US complaint that it was concealing the true dimensions of its modernization and buildup. Chinese President Hu Jintao (
Last month's destruction by China of one of its own satellites was cited as evidence of intent.
"Confidence still seems too low and suspicions too high to allow for meaningful engagement on these or broader military matters between China and the US," Chipman warned.
INSURGENCIES
The IISS urges the US and allies to pay more attention to psychological warfare and "influence operations" on the basis of their Afghan and Iraqi experiences.
"Insurgents and jihadists have proved adept at conducting successful information campaigns that reach a global audience and foment violence elsewhere," it said.
Western armies have not kept up. Announcements by NATO forces of how many fighters they had killed could be counter-productive because, for the Taliban, "death is a form of victory."
Taking on novel military challenges doesn't come cheap.
"New equipment requires finance outside the normal budgetary cycle," the IISS report said. "Part of the capacity to react quickly is contingency funding on a level not previously envisaged by those countries that sought to cut defense spending following the end of the Cold War."
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
INSPIRING: Taiwan has been a model in the Asia-Pacific region with its democratic transition, free and fair elections and open society, the vice president-elect said Taiwan can play a leadership role in the Asia-Pacific region, vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) told a forum in Taipei yesterday, highlighting the nation’s resilience in the face of geopolitical challenges. “Not only can Taiwan help, but Taiwan can lead ... not only can Taiwan play a leadership role, but Taiwan’s leadership is important to the world,” Hsiao told the annual forum hosted by the Center for Asia-Pacific Resilience and Innovation think tank. Hsiao thanked Taiwan’s international friends for their long-term support, citing the example of US President Joe Biden last month signing into law a bill to provide aid to Taiwan,
China’s intrusive and territorial claims in the Indo-Pacific region are “illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive,” new US Indo-Pacific Commander Admiral Samuel Paparo said on Friday, adding that he would continue working with allies and partners to keep the area free and open. Paparo made the remarks at a change-of-command ceremony at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii, where he took over the command from Admiral John Aquilino. “Our world faces a complex problem set in the troubling actions of the People’s Republic of China [PRC] and its rapid buildup of forces. We must be ready to answer the PRC’s increasingly intrusive and
STATE OF THE NATION: The legislature should invite the president to deliver an address every year, the TPP said, adding that Lai should also have to answer legislators’ questions The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) yesterday proposed inviting president-elect William Lai (賴清德) to make a historic first state of the nation address at the legislature following his inauguration on May 20. Lai is expected to face many domestic and international challenges, and should clarify his intended policies with the public’s representatives, KMT caucus secretary-general Hung Meng-kai (洪孟楷) said when making the proposal at a meeting of the legislature’s Procedure Committee. The committee voted to add the item to the agenda for Friday, along with another similar proposal put forward by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). The invitation is in line with Article 15-2