Whether or not there had been a major shift in the main opposition party's cross-strait policy was the question of the day, as politicians exchanged heated words over a newspaper ad yesterday.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) denied that it had changed its stance or that it had ever considered independence an option for Taiwan's future, saying the party's cross-strait stance was to maintain the "status quo."
Meanwhile, the DPP said yesterday that it welcomed what it saw as a change of heart by the KMT, and urged the party to support the abolishment of the National Unification Guidelines in keeping with its "new" political vision.
The KMT published a print ad titled "Taiwan's Pragmatic Path" on the cover of the Chinese-language Liberty Times, the Taipei Times sister newspaper, on Tuesday.
The ad stressed the importance of maintaining the "status quo" in the cross-strait relationship, listing the other choices for the country's future as unification or independence. The listing of "independence" as an option in the ad was interpreted by many to mean that the KMT now considered "independence" one of the possibilities for Taiwan's future.
"The KMT firmly believes that, in keeping with the spirit of democracy, there are many options for Taiwan's future, be it reunification, independence or the status quo. It is necessary that the choice be made by the people," the ad said.
After it came under fire for this perceived acceptance of independence as a possibility, the party yesterday tried to clarify its position.
The KMT said that Taiwan's future should be decided by the Taiwanese people. While independence might be one of the many choices for the country, that option does not tally with the KMT's policy and stance, party officials said.
"Neither reunification nor independence is likely for Taiwan in the foreseeable future, nor can either of those two options preserve the people's interests. The KMT firmly believes that Taiwan should maintain the status quo," KMT communication and culture committee deputy chairman Huang Yu-chen (
Pushing for independence, which the party said would damage the democratic status of Taiwan, was not policy, he said. The party would instead continue to promote Taiwan's democracy as well as peace in the Taiwan Strait, Huang said.
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
"Unification, independence and maintaining the status quo are all options for Taiwan's future. As citizens of a democratic country, the people of Taiwan are free to choose which option to pursue, so long as the choices are constitutional and do not violate any of the laws of the country," he said yesterday morning in Dublin.
While respecting the choices of the Taiwanese people, the KMT advocates maintaining the status quo at present, Ma added.
Meanwhile, the pan-green camp used the controversy to bolster its cross-strait stance.
"The way to check if Ma truly supports his argument that Taiwan's future should be determined by all the people of Taiwan lies in whether Ma will support the abolition of the National Unification Guidelines," Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Secretary-General Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said in a news conference yesterday morning.
Lin said that if independence is indeed a choice for the people of Taiwan as Ma acknowledged, then the development of cross-strait relations should be open and no prerequisite or conclusion for cross-strait relations should be set.
"If Ma and the KMT still oppose annulling the National Unification Council and unification guidelines that support Taiwan's unification with China, then Ma's remarks and the KMT's newspaper ad were all just part of a public manipulation campaign," Lin added.
Lin said that Ma should also clarify his previous remarks about "eventual unification" and should make clear the meaning of the word "people" in his phrase "Taiwan's future should be determined by all the people of Taiwan," by explaining whether it refers to the 23 million people of Taiwan or it includes the 1.3 billion people in China.
The DPP had planned to run an ad in yesterday's newspapers countering the KMT's ad, but it decided to postpone it.
"Recently Ma has vacillated and come out with a number of conflicting statements when talking about cross-strait relations. Therefore, the DPP has decided to keep an eye on his words and actions and react to Ma's latest version of cross-strait relations," Lin said.
DPP spokesman Tsai Huang-liang (
Even as the KMT endeavored to clarify the message contained in the ad, it was apparent that the issue had already caused conflict between the party and its pan-blue ally, the People First Party (PFP), who yesterday said the listing of independence as an option for Taiwan's future by the KMT could have "more serious consequences than the president's statement of intent to abolish the unification guidelines."
"The PFP has always stayed firm on our stance, which is to maintain the status quo across the Taiwan Strait. We are opposed to listing independence for Taiwan as an option," PFP spokesman Hsieh Kung-pin (
The cooperation between the PFP and the KMT, Hsieh said, is based on the same political ideology. In the face of the reunification/independence dispute, the KMT needs to clarify the matter and solve the controversy by itself.
"As the country's biggest opposition party, the listing of independence as an option for Taiwan's future by the KMT is unbelievable and it will only bring trouble for the people," Hsieh said.
also see story:
Editorial: Time to push Ma off the fence
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu said the strengthening of military facilities would help to maintain security in the Taiwan Strait Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi, visiting a military base close to Taiwan, said plans to deploy missiles to the post would move forward as tensions smolder between Tokyo and Beijing. “The deployment can help lower the chance of an armed attack on our country,” Koizumi told reporters on Sunday as he wrapped up his first trip to the base on the southern Japanese island of Yonaguni. “The view that it will heighten regional tensions is not accurate.” Former Japanese minister of defense Gen Nakatani in January said that Tokyo wanted to base Type 03 Chu-SAM missiles on Yonaguni, but little progress
NO CHANGES: A Japanese spokesperson said that Tokyo remains consistent and open for dialogue, while Beijing has canceled diplomatic engagements A Japanese official blasted China’s claims that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has altered Japan’s position on a Taiwan crisis as “entirely baseless,” calling for more dialogue to stop ties between Asia’s top economies from spiraling. China vowed to take resolute self-defense against Japan if it “dared to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait” in a letter delivered Friday to the UN. “I’m aware of this letter,” said Maki Kobayashi, a senior Japanese government spokeswoman. “The claim our country has altered its position is entirely baseless,” she said on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg on Saturday. The Chinese Ministry
RSS