Thousands of pro-independence marchers took to the streets in Taipei yesterday afternoon to demonstrate their will to defend the nation, and protest against the pan-blue opposition's ongoing obstruction of the special budget for US arms.
A policeman at the scene estimated the crowd at 20,000, but there was no official count given. Event organizers gave much higher estimates.
The march was organized by the World Federation of Taiwanese Associations and the Hand-in-Hand Taiwan Alliance. Joining them were members of the World United Formosans for Independence, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and social groups.
PHOTO: LIN CHENG-KUN, TAIPEI TIMES
Participants assembled at 2pm at Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall and began streaming into the streets at 3pm, marching down Xinyi Road, Hangzhou S Road and Zhongshan S Road. The protesters ended up on Ketagelan Boulevard in front of the Presidential Office, where a succession of speeches was delivered by pro-independence leaders. The march was peaceful and no trouble was reported.
"All participants want to let the world know that Taiwanese hope that their country can possess advanced weapons to resist China and that they are determined to defend themselves. This is why we stand here today," Ng Chiau-tong (黃昭堂), the head of the alliance and chairman of World United Formosans for Independence, told the crowd.
Yesterday's parade was marked by less energy and passion than past pro-independence rallies, and important political figures such as President Chen Shui-bian (
Northern Taiwan Society chairman Wu Shuh-min (吳樹民), the executive chief of the march, suggested recalling opposition lawmakers who have boycotted the arms procurement bill.
"The Legislative Yuan has degenerated into the opposition parties' political arena since the pan-blues lost power in 2000," Wu said. "Bills concerning people's livelihood and welfare have been detained in the legislature, and the arms bill that is crucial to national security did not even obtain the rational discussion it deserves, and was vetoed 29 times because of the pan-blue lawmakers' malicious boycott."
"Such a legislature is worthless and should be recalled, because [opposition lawmakers] don't even know which country is their real motherland," Wu said.
Most of the march participants were pro-independence stalwarts who joined in the 228 Hand-in-Hand rally held last year and the large-scale march against China's "Anti-Secession" Law held on March 26.
A 53-year-old clothing factory owner, who only gave his family name, Lin (
Lin said that although the turnout yesterday seemed rather light, "I think most Taiwanese agreed that we need adequate arms to resist China and protect ourselves."
A 25-year-old man surnamed Chang (
"I support Taiwan's independence and I think Taiwan will be independent in the long run. But first and foremost, Taiwan has to have the power to protect itself," said Chang, who has taken part in pro-independence activities since college.
"Although I don't think every purchase listed in the arms sales bill is necessary, the reality is that the US will not assist in Taiwan's defense if we don't buy them," he said.
Kang, an elementary school teacher who is also 25, said that although yesterday's parade might not sway pan-blue lawmakers, through media reports of the event, the world would know that many Taiwanese are strongly committed to defending Taiwan.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu said the strengthening of military facilities would help to maintain security in the Taiwan Strait Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi, visiting a military base close to Taiwan, said plans to deploy missiles to the post would move forward as tensions smolder between Tokyo and Beijing. “The deployment can help lower the chance of an armed attack on our country,” Koizumi told reporters on Sunday as he wrapped up his first trip to the base on the southern Japanese island of Yonaguni. “The view that it will heighten regional tensions is not accurate.” Former Japanese minister of defense Gen Nakatani in January said that Tokyo wanted to base Type 03 Chu-SAM missiles on Yonaguni, but little progress
INTERCEPTION: The 30km test ceiling shows that the CSIST is capable of producing missiles that could stop inbound missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere Recent missile tests by the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology (CSIST) show that Taiwan’s missiles are capable of intercepting ballistic missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere and pose a significant deterrent to Chinese missile threats, former Hsiung Feng III missile development project chief engineer Chang Cheng (張誠) said yesterday. The military-affiliated institute has been conducting missile tests, believed to be related to Project Chiang Kung (強弓) at Pingtung County’s Jiupeng Military Base, with many tests deviating from past practices of setting restriction zones at “unlimited” and instead clearly stating a 30.48km range, Chang said. “Unlimited” restrictions zones for missile tests is