The Legislative Yuan is bracing itself for a showdown vote today on the law governing the operation of the National Assembly as cross-party talks called to tackle the issue yesterday failed to get off the ground.
After the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was the only party to show up for the talks, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
"Since these are the last cross-party talks held to discuss the matter, I will handle the DPP caucus' motion [today] in accordance with the law if it files a request to reconsider the legislation," he said.
Despite joining other parties to pass the Law on the National Assembly's Exercise of Power (
The National Assembly is to meet in the coming weeks to approve a raft of constitutional amendments passed by the legislature last August, which include halving the legislature, abolishing the assembly and putting the right to referendum in the Constitution.
The DPP hopes to lower the bar for the assembly's approval of constitutional amendments from the law's 75 percent to a 50 percent simple majority -- its original position before the May 14 National Assembly elections -- and also hopes to exclude invalid ballots from the total number of votes. The statute currently stipulates that ballots cast by assembly members failing to toe their party's line should be considered invalid, but be counted into the total number of votes anyway.
Meanwhile, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) yesterday threatened to join forces to strike down the DPP's motion to reconsider part of the law, during today's plenary legislative session. The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) and Non-partisan Solidarity Union (NPSU) also voiced their opposition to the DPP plan.
According to the legislature's rules, lawmakers managing to collect more than 40 signatures can request that the legislature review part or all of a bill that has already been passed. The request must be made during the first plenary legislative session following the passage of the bill, which in this bill's case takes place today.
The legislative speaker is obliged to deal with the request by the end of the day the request is made. The speaker could put the DPP's motion to a full vote, or could put off the motion for discussion at a later time.
Before the bill under re-examination is dealt with by the legislature, it cannot be promulgated by the president. Also, the vote on a measure to reconsider a bill is the last chance to attempt to change a law before it is promulgated.
The director of the DPP's Policy Committee, Ker Chien-ming (
"The reason [for the request] is that the law is flawed," he said, while admitting that the DPP has been pressured by some private groups.
The passage of the legislation reportedly angered former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄), who has been pushing the DPP to stand firm on its former stance of a simple majority ratification threshold for constitutional amendments.
The DPP's decision to request a review of the law was jointly made by the party headquarters and the caucus, Ker said.
According to Ker, DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) telephoned him Friday after the law passed the legislature to discuss the possibility of filing a request to review some articles of the law. A caucus meeting was also held at noon that day to discuss the matter.
Despite the DPP's appeal to other parties, the KMT and PFP caucuses yesterday did not hesitate to pour cold water on the rival party's proposal.
"We are not a subordinate of the DPP," said KMT caucus whip Chen Chieh (
PFP caucus whip Chen Chih-pin (陳志彬) said that it is meaningless and ineffective to talk with a party which reneges on its promises.
For his part, DPP Legislator Chen Chin-de (
"[Wang] knew that DPP caucus whip Jao Yun-ching (趙永清) did not show up at the cross-party negotiations, nor did he assign any proxy to sign the agreement, but he turned a blind eye to it," he said.
Chen criticized the multiparty negotiation system for leading to oligarchy in the legislature as well as secret meetings, spoils systems and blackmail politics.
"It also results in legislative mayhem ... as well as the formidable power of caucus whips and Wang's dominating role," he said.
In other legislative news, contentious articles in the draft amendments of the Outlying Islands Development Law (離島建設條例) will be put to a vote if no consensus is made during a four-month cross-party negotiation period.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from