Pentagon officials raised the possibility on Thursday of indefinite detention of prisoners from the Afghan war, saying that captives might not be released from US custody even if they were acquitted in a military tribunal.
In addition, they said, prisoners may be held for the duration of the war, and there is no end in sight.
US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has said previously that the 500 prisoners in custody -- 300 in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and nearly 200 in Afghanistan -- could be held indefinitely, but this possibility was given a new twist on Thursday as Rumsfeld and top aides announced the rules by which military tribunals would be conducted.
"If we had a trial right this minute, it is conceivable that somebody could be tried and acquitted of that charge but may not necessarily automatically be re-leased," said William Haynes, the Pentagon's top lawyer, calling the prisoners "dangerous people."
The tribunals, which would be mostly open to reporters, would have three to seven members and require a unanimous vote for imposing the death penalty, rather than the two-thirds vote that US President George W. Bush had called for originally in establishing the tribunals on Nov. 13. They also loosen the rules of evidence, allowing hearsay and do not provide an independent appeals process.
Rumsfeld said: "If one steps back from examining the procedures provision by provision and instead drops a plumb line down through the center of them all, we believe that most people will find that, taken together, they are fair and balanced and that justice will be served in their application."
But some human rights groups were in an uproar over the rules.
Jamie Fellner, a spokeswoman for Human Rights Watch, said: "Not to have an independent court of appeals and then to have the president have the final say potentially undercuts whatever fairness they have sought to provide at the trial level."
The rules drew little criticism from Congress.
Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat and chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said that he had commended Rumsfeld on Thursday for "taking steps that have substantially improved this proposal."
Senator Arlen Specter, a Republican, said the rules were "on the right track" but he still wanted them to be approved by Congress. He has introduced legislation offering slightly different rules, and said he wants hearings on the matter.
Haynes said that it was too early to tell who might face the tribunals because it was difficult to gather evidence from the battlefield and from the prisoners.
"They're singularly uncooperative," Haynes said.
Other senior administration officials said that perhaps a dozen or two dozen of the 500 prisoners in US custody would be likely candidates.
"The purpose is to try people who have committed the most significant violations of the laws of war, and there may be other ways to address other people, including transferring them to other countries," one official said.
He said that the administration expected the trials would not begin for several months because of the laborious process of building a case. "Each of these trials will be very difficult to do," the official said.
During the briefing, Haynes and Douglas Feith, undersecretary for policy, said it was possible that someone could be acquitted in a tribunal but not set free. Feith said that as in civilian courts, a prisoner might be acquitted on one charge "but there still may be other reasons to hold the person."
Haynes also defended the idea: "When somebody's trying to kill you or your people, and you capture them, you can hold them," he said.
"We are within our rights," Haynes added, "and I don't think anyone disputes it, that we may hold enemy combatants for the duration of the conflict. And the conflict is still going and we don't see an end in sight right now."
But, he added, "if we find that we're holding somebody who is not of intelligence interest to us, is not of law enforcement interest to us, is not a threat, in our view, to Americans, to the United States, to our interests, to our allies or friends as a terrorist -- if we don't have any interest in holding the person, we'll let them go."
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from