Lee Wen-ho (李文和), the former Taiwan-born Los Alamos scientist who was charged with security violations and jailed for nine months, may be on a collision course with the government over whether he has violated security rules in the handling of his forthcoming autobiography.
The dispute puts the federal government in an awkward position. Critics said that the government imprisoned Lee because of his ethnic background, and federal officials are wary of tangling with him again since they could face new accusations of racism. But other would-be authors who fall under the same security rules as Lee, as well as some federal officials, say fairness demands that the government deal with Lee no differently than anyone else if he has broken the rules.
Individuals like Lee who receive security clearances, especially high-level ones that give access to nuclear secrets, pledge to submit any manuscripts to federal censors before letting other people see them. The aim is to prevent the inadvertent release of government secrets.
Lee submitted his manuscript to federal censors in July, three months before its intended publication, in October. Federal and private security experts said the submission for security review was belated and raised the question of whether people other than the author -- like his co-author and his editor, among others -- had seen the manuscript. If so, he could have violated federal rules and in theory could find himself facing new charges and penalties.
One person who admitted reading the manuscript, and who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that at least five people had seen it and that it contained nothing that would get Lee in trouble. "This is not national secrets he's revealing," the person said. "It's a nice little story."
Joseph Davis, a spokesman for the Department of Energy, which runs Los Alamos and is reviewing Lee's manuscript, said the agency would make no exception to its rules for the scientist. "We're not going to shortcut that process or cut any corners for anybody," he said.
Normally, Davis added, if the government finds that a manuscript under review has been distributed to other people and contains secrets, "then it becomes a question of whether the US Justice Department would pursue that" to see if laws were broken.
Mark Holscher, one of Lee's lawyers, said the scientist would have no comment. "From our perspective," he said, "Lee is following the procedures that we believe are required by law for the publication of his book."
Lee's book, My Country Versus Me: The First-Hand Account by the Los Alamos Scientist Who Was Falsely Accused of Being a Spy, is described as an autobiography and was written with Helen Zia, a journalist. It will be published by Hyperion Books. While the book is scheduled for publication in October the dispute over the security rules and over whether his manuscript contains federal secrets could delay its publication, the security experts say.
Will Schwalbe, the book's editor and the editor in chief of Hyperion Books, which is based in New York, defended Lee's actions and denounced any attempt to slow the book's publication.
"The way he was treated was a disgrace," Schwalbe said, referring to how the government handled Lee's case. "If there were attempts made to stop this book's publication or hinder it, that would add to the disgrace." He said he believed that Lee is a "patriotic American who has no intention whatsoever of revealing any classified information."
A Lee family friend said that Zia was deferring all questions to the book's editor. Schwalbe declined to say whether he had read the manuscript. Usually, any book this close to publication would have been thoroughly edited, with publicists working hard to win favorable reviews for it.
Hyperion's publicity describes the book as a "compelling narrative that takes readers inside Los Alamos," the New Mexico birthplace of the atomic bomb and today a sprawling federal laboratory complex. It says the book's disclosures include why Lee downloaded nuclear weapons codes to insecure computers, what he really did at Los Alamos for two decades and how the Federal Bureau of Investigation was "hell-bent on proving Lee Wen-ho was a spy, even if they had to resort to deception and fabrication to do so."
In December 1999, prosecutors charged Lee with 59 counts of mishandling classified information. But in September 2000, after Lee had spent nine months in jail awaiting trial, a judge freed him after he pleaded guilty to one felony count of mishandling secrets. His jailing, the judged declared, had "embarrassed our entire nation."
Lee's plea agreement put no restrictions on his writing about his experiences. A publisher's advertisement says the book tells the story of Lee, his legal battle and "how violations of nuclear security were rampant throughout the weapons laboratory."
In the past, people have gotten into serious legal trouble for ignoring the censors. Frank Snepp, a former CIA employee, was accused of violating his security oath after he skipped the security review to publish Decent Interval, about the fall of Saigon. He was forced by the Supreme Court to give the government US$140,000.
A senior federal official familiar with government security reviews, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the Lee case was so politically charged that Washington might pull its punches. "They're scared to death of the guy," he said, most especially of new "charges of racism."
Some experts have suggested that the rush to publication and the security dispute is simply a way for Lee to thumb his nose at the government or for the publisher to win publicity. Others say it reflects simple bumbling.
A private expert familiar with Lee's case, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity, said the government was unlikely to go after Lee even if he did share the manuscript with other people. The reason, he said, is that "you can't write a book in the modern age without violating security rules." For instance, he said, individuals are likely to use home computers to write books rather than going to a secure federal site, as the letter of the law requires. "You're not going to prosecute people for that," the private expert said.
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from
REGIONAL STABILITY: Taipei thanked the Biden administration for authorizing its 16th sale of military goods and services to uphold Taiwan’s defense and safety The US Department of State has approved the sale of US$228 million of military goods and services to Taiwan, the US Department of Defense said on Monday. The state department “made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale” to the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US for “return, repair and reshipment of spare parts and related equipment,” the defense department’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency said in a news release. Taiwan had requested the purchase of items and services which include the “return, repair and reshipment of classified and unclassified spare parts for aircraft and related equipment; US Government