Stung by newly published documents detailing Chinese leaders' squabbles over the crushing of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, China's government yesterday defended the crackdown and suggested the papers were fakes.
In the first official reaction to their weekend release in the US, China's Foreign Ministry labeled the documents apiece with previous efforts abroad to rekindle controversy over the divisive crackdown.
"Any attempt to play up the matter again and disrupt China by the despicable means of fabricating materials and distorting facts will be futile," Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhu Bangzao (朱邦造) said in a statement carried by the government's Xinhua News Agency.
The crackdown was "highly necessary to the stability and development of China," Zhu said, adding that the ruling Communist Party's "correct conclusion" about the July 1989 protests would not change.
Supposedly smuggled out of China by a disaffected civil servant and vetted by US-based China scholars, the documents -- dubbed the Tiananmen Papers -- purportedly contain minutes of secret high-level meetings, intelligence reports and phone conversations by party patriarch Deng Xiaoping (
The documents -- if authentic -- show a leadership in turmoil over the million-strong democracy protests and their suppression on June 4, 1989.
Their release threatens to aggravate ever-present strains among reformist and conservative factions in the party and reawaken debate over political change.
"The publication of these high-level decisions on the June 4 suppression will be positive, not only for a just resolution, but also for accelerating the advance of China's democratization," 111 people wounded and relatives of some slain in the crackdown said in a statement released by New York-based Human Rights in China.
Ever since the crackdown, the government has maintained that the protests were an anti-government rebellion that needed to be crushed to safeguard economic growth -- a view now supported by many Chinese who have benefited from free-market reforms.
But public resentment also lingers, especially in Beijing. Hundreds were killed and thousands arrested in the crackdown.
The actual toll is not known because the government has never allowed a credible inquiry.
Initially, the government had no comment about the documents and China's wholly state-run media did not report them. But news of the papers leaked into China via the Internet, foreign radio broadcasts and word of mouth, stirring the beginnings of debate.
Chinese Web site censors sought to silence the discussion. One message that detailed CNN's coverage of the documents was deleted within minutes of appearing on a popular chat site.
But other messages, some questioning why news of the documents was suppressed and whether they were authentic, briefly got through.
"To know whether the Tiananmen Papers are true or not, just look at them on an overseas Web site and judge for yourself ... If one has done no wrong why fear other people knowing?" one surfer said in a Web posting that was later deleted.
The papers confirm popular perceptions that Li Peng (
Human rights groups and victims of the crackdown who have long targeted Li said the papers could help bring him to justice. New York-based Human Rights in China hoped the papers would bring Li a fate similar to Chile's Augusto Pinochet, internationally hounded to account for his brutal rule.
The very ability of someone, or a group of people, to collect the sensitive documents and spirit them out of China show that some within the Communist Party support political change and want the Tiananmen crackdown re-examined.
"Maybe the person who carried the documents is not a very high-level official, but quite senior leaders must have known about this," said Wu Guoguang (
But Bao Tong (鮑彤), also an adviser to Zhao and the most senior communist official imprisoned for the crackdown, said the documents could forestall political reform.
"It's possible some people will be scared and therefore say `politics cannot be reformed, news must continue to be blocked off, rights must be stripped away to an even greater extent,'" said Bao, who spent seven years in prison and another year detained in a guest house for leaking word of the crackdown.
But Bao also said the documents would be a revelation to a majority of today's government officials who were not privy to the leadership battles of 1989.
"It will make them reconsider how this incident happened, what kind of problem it was, what kind of society China's is, what kind of system we work under, what procedures and systems are used in Chinese decision-making, how did Tiananmen happen and how can we avoid a recurrence?" Bao said. "Everyone will be bound to consider these questions."
NO HUMAN ERROR: After the incident, the Coast Guard Administration said it would obtain uncrewed aerial vehicles and vessels to boost its detection capacity Authorities would improve border control to prevent unlawful entry into Taiwan’s waters and safeguard national security, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday after a Chinese man reached the nation’s coast on an inflatable boat, saying he “defected to freedom.” The man was found on a rubber boat when he was about to set foot on Taiwan at the estuary of Houkeng River (後坑溪) near Taiping Borough (太平) in New Taipei City’s Linkou District (林口), authorities said. The Coast Guard Administration’s (CGA) northern branch said it received a report at 6:30am yesterday morning from the New Taipei City Fire Department about a
IN BEIJING’S FAVOR: A China Coast Guard spokesperson said that the Chinese maritime police would continue to carry out law enforcement activities in waters it claims The Philippines withdrew its coast guard vessel from a South China Sea shoal that has recently been at the center of tensions with Beijing. BRP Teresa Magbanua “was compelled to return to port” from Sabina Shoal (Xianbin Shoal, 仙濱暗沙) due to bad weather, depleted supplies and the need to evacuate personnel requiring medical care, the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) spokesman Jay Tarriela said yesterday in a post on X. The Philippine vessel “will be in tiptop shape to resume her mission” after it has been resupplied and repaired, Philippine Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, who heads the nation’s maritime council, said
CHINA POLICY: At the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China, the two sides issued strong support for Taiwan and condemned China’s actions in the South China Sea The US and EU issued a joint statement on Wednesday supporting Taiwan’s international participation, notably omitting the “one China” policy in a departure from previous similar statements, following high-level talks on China and the Indo-Pacific region. The statement also urged China to show restraint in the Taiwan Strait. US Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell and European External Action Service Secretary-General Stefano Sannino cochaired the seventh US-EU Dialogue on China and the sixth US-EU Indo-Pacific Consultations from Monday to Tuesday. Since the Indo-Pacific consultations were launched in 2021, references to the “one China” policy have appeared in every statement apart from the
More than 500 people on Saturday marched in New York in support of Taiwan’s entry to the UN, significantly more people than previous years. The march, coinciding with the ongoing 79th session of the UN General Assembly, comes close on the heels of growing international discourse regarding the meaning of UN Resolution 2758. Resolution 2758, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1971, recognizes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the “only lawful representative of China.” It resulted in the Republic of China (ROC) losing its seat at the UN to the PRC. Taiwan has since been excluded from