Stung by newly published documents detailing Chinese leaders' squabbles over the crushing of the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, China's government yesterday defended the crackdown and suggested the papers were fakes.
In the first official reaction to their weekend release in the US, China's Foreign Ministry labeled the documents apiece with previous efforts abroad to rekindle controversy over the divisive crackdown.
"Any attempt to play up the matter again and disrupt China by the despicable means of fabricating materials and distorting facts will be futile," Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhu Bangzao (朱邦造) said in a statement carried by the government's Xinhua News Agency.
The crackdown was "highly necessary to the stability and development of China," Zhu said, adding that the ruling Communist Party's "correct conclusion" about the July 1989 protests would not change.
Supposedly smuggled out of China by a disaffected civil servant and vetted by US-based China scholars, the documents -- dubbed the Tiananmen Papers -- purportedly contain minutes of secret high-level meetings, intelligence reports and phone conversations by party patriarch Deng Xiaoping (
The documents -- if authentic -- show a leadership in turmoil over the million-strong democracy protests and their suppression on June 4, 1989.
Their release threatens to aggravate ever-present strains among reformist and conservative factions in the party and reawaken debate over political change.
"The publication of these high-level decisions on the June 4 suppression will be positive, not only for a just resolution, but also for accelerating the advance of China's democratization," 111 people wounded and relatives of some slain in the crackdown said in a statement released by New York-based Human Rights in China.
Ever since the crackdown, the government has maintained that the protests were an anti-government rebellion that needed to be crushed to safeguard economic growth -- a view now supported by many Chinese who have benefited from free-market reforms.
But public resentment also lingers, especially in Beijing. Hundreds were killed and thousands arrested in the crackdown.
The actual toll is not known because the government has never allowed a credible inquiry.
Initially, the government had no comment about the documents and China's wholly state-run media did not report them. But news of the papers leaked into China via the Internet, foreign radio broadcasts and word of mouth, stirring the beginnings of debate.
Chinese Web site censors sought to silence the discussion. One message that detailed CNN's coverage of the documents was deleted within minutes of appearing on a popular chat site.
But other messages, some questioning why news of the documents was suppressed and whether they were authentic, briefly got through.
"To know whether the Tiananmen Papers are true or not, just look at them on an overseas Web site and judge for yourself ... If one has done no wrong why fear other people knowing?" one surfer said in a Web posting that was later deleted.
The papers confirm popular perceptions that Li Peng (
Human rights groups and victims of the crackdown who have long targeted Li said the papers could help bring him to justice. New York-based Human Rights in China hoped the papers would bring Li a fate similar to Chile's Augusto Pinochet, internationally hounded to account for his brutal rule.
The very ability of someone, or a group of people, to collect the sensitive documents and spirit them out of China show that some within the Communist Party support political change and want the Tiananmen crackdown re-examined.
"Maybe the person who carried the documents is not a very high-level official, but quite senior leaders must have known about this," said Wu Guoguang (
But Bao Tong (鮑彤), also an adviser to Zhao and the most senior communist official imprisoned for the crackdown, said the documents could forestall political reform.
"It's possible some people will be scared and therefore say `politics cannot be reformed, news must continue to be blocked off, rights must be stripped away to an even greater extent,'" said Bao, who spent seven years in prison and another year detained in a guest house for leaking word of the crackdown.
But Bao also said the documents would be a revelation to a majority of today's government officials who were not privy to the leadership battles of 1989.
"It will make them reconsider how this incident happened, what kind of problem it was, what kind of society China's is, what kind of system we work under, what procedures and systems are used in Chinese decision-making, how did Tiananmen happen and how can we avoid a recurrence?" Bao said. "Everyone will be bound to consider these questions."
NO-LIMITS PARTNERSHIP: ‘The bottom line’ is that if the US were to have a conflict with China or Russia it would likely open up a second front with the other, a US senator said Beijing and Moscow could cooperate in a conflict over Taiwan, the top US intelligence chief told the US Senate this week. “We see China and Russia, for the first time, exercising together in relation to Taiwan and recognizing that this is a place where China definitely wants Russia to be working with them, and we see no reason why they wouldn’t,” US Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines told a US Senate Committee on Armed Services hearing on Thursday. US Senator Mike Rounds asked Haines about such a potential scenario. He also asked US Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lieutenant General Jeffrey Kruse
STUMPED: KMT and TPP lawmakers approved a resolution to suspend the rate hike, which the government said was unavoidable in view of rising global energy costs The Ministry of Economic Affairs yesterday said it has a mandate to raise electricity prices as planned after the legislature passed a non-binding resolution along partisan lines to freeze rates. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers proposed the resolution to suspend the price hike, which passed by a 59-50 vote. The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) voted with the KMT. Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT said the resolution is a mandate for the “immediate suspension of electricity price hikes” and for the Executive Yuan to review its energy policy and propose supplementary measures. A government-organized electricity price evaluation board in March
NOVEL METHODS: The PLA has adopted new approaches and recently conducted three combat readiness drills at night which included aircraft and ships, an official said Taiwan is monitoring China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) exercises for changes in their size or pattern as the nation prepares for president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20, National Security Bureau (NSB) Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) said yesterday. Tsai made the comment at a meeting of the Legislative Yuan’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, in response to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Wang Ting-yu’s (王定宇) questions. China continues to employ a carrot-and-stick approach, in which it applies pressure with “gray zone” tactics, while attempting to entice Taiwanese with perks, Tsai said. These actions aim to help Beijing look like it has
China is mischaracterizing UN Resolution 2758 for its own interests by conflating it with its “one China” principle, US Deputy Assistant Secretary for China and Taiwan Mark Lambert said on Monday. Speaking at a seminar held by the German Marshall Fund, Lambert called for support for Taiwan’s meaningful participation in the international community at a time when China is increasingly misusing Resolution 2758. The resolution had a clear impact when it changed who occupied the China seat at the UN, Lambert said. “Today, however, the PRC [People’s Republic of China] increasingly mischaracterizes and misuses Resolution 2758 to serve its own interests,” Lambert said. “Beijing