Out of his Taipei office, American expatriate Mike Campbell creates downloadable self-study language kits for a global market.
The product, Glossika, is a bit like Rosetta Stone, offering spaced repetition exercises in English, Mandarin, Spanish and other common languages of the world. Unlike Rosetta Stone, Glossika has also begun developing courses for Taiwan’s ethnic and minority languages.
He is planning a kit for Hakka in cooperation with the Hakka Affairs Council (客家委員會), as well as for endangered languages like Amis, Atayal, Puyuma, Rukai, Sediq, Tao, Thao and Truku.
Photo courtesy of Glossika
Released last week, Campbell’s first Taiwan-based course teaches English speakers the language of Hoklo, also known as Taiwanese and one of the Minnan dialects spoken by about 75 percent of the country’s population.
Minnan is a tonal language that branched off from Chinese in the time of Confucius, about a thousand years earlier than Cantonese and Hakka did, Campbell said.
Because it is so old, Minnan retains final palatal endings that today exist elsewhere only in early borrowings of Chinese words in Vietnamese.
Also due to its age, Minnan has a capaciously diverse vocabulary. For example, the Minnan word for beautiful, sui, is cognate with the word suay in the Thai language.
“This language is so old that parts of its vocabulary are Austric or Austronesian. It goes back so far in time when those languages were still developing,” he said.
TAIWAN MINNAN (hoklo)
Minnan was first spoken in what is now Guangzhou and the southeast coast of present-day Fujian province, but today it is also used in Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines with different intonations that are mutually intelligible.
Campbell’s program teaches Hoklo, a variant of Minnan spoken in Taiwan, featuring voice recordings by Tsan Ik Hian (曾弋軒), a graduate student at Taiwan Normal University’s Department of Taiwan Culture, Languages and Literature (師大台灣語文學系).
“The standard Taiwanese Minnan is different from the version in Fujian due to Japanese colonialization and influences from now-extinct Pingpu Aboriginal tribes. For example, bala (guava) is borrowed from the Aborigines,” Tsan said.
Hoklo also changed during decades of Martial Law era policies that actively phased out its use in favor of Mandarin.
Today, young speakers do not pronounce Hoklo in the standard Taiwanese dialect, but tend to drop the final sounds of syllables, she said.
Tsan, 25, is a native of Greater Tainan who speaks Hoklo in a clear lilting voice.
She is one of the few Hoklo speakers who know and habitually write with tailo (台羅), a romanization system developed by Taiwan’s Ministry of Education in the 1990s.
Hoklo does not have a standard writing system of its own, Campbell said.
Instead, Minnan speakers across history have sometimes used peh-oe-ji, an orthography that missionaries from the West developed in the 19th century.
In Taiwan, some speakers have mastered tailo, but most use Chinese characters idiosyncratically to represent spoken Minnan.
A MORIBUND LANGUAGE
Campbell is developing kits for other languages of Taiwan including Thao, which today has only five living speakers.
The Thao Aboriginal people, who live near Sun Moon Lake, have a dwindling population of around 300. Most are fluent in Mandarin and Minnan but not Thao.
Thao is a 7,000-year-old language with few words for modern technology and a rich and granular vocabulary for plants, animals and other aspects of the physical world.
Two in the tiny cohort of fluent speakers are an elderly couple that Campbell visits in their village for chats. He carefully documents the fine points of lexicon and grammar as his hosts talk and pour tea and the sun sets over their lakeside valley.
“I love the sound. It is very easy to express yourself in this language,” Campbell said.
“It gives you a sort of sense, connection with the earth, nature, history.”
For Campbell, providing minorities access to majority languages can help them substantively improve their lives. Promoting a minority language helps its marginalized speakers survive and be discovered by the world.
“Many of those people are still living here in Taiwan. You just have to find them,” he said.
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
RSS