Sergey Brin wanted to test a job applicant, so he gave her a snap assignment, writes Ken Auletta in his new book, Googled.
“I need you to draw me a contract,” the Google Inc cofounder told the Harvard Law graduate. “I need the contract to be for me to sell my soul to the devil.”
As far as I know, Brin never signed that satanic bargain. Yet the anecdote reflects a question at the core of Auletta’s thoughtful inside look at the engineers who say “don’t be evil” even as they upend what he calls the world as we know it.
Is Google, the owner of the world’s favorite search engine, a force for good — or for ill? Is it a friend to the fourth estate, on which democracy depends, or an enemy?
The answer found in this journey through Google’s history of breakthroughs, boundless ambitions and free massages on its campus in Mountain View, California, can be summed up in a word used by advertising executive Martin Sorrell: Google is a “frenemy” — neither a friend nor an enemy “but a rival power to guard against,” as the author puts it.
Auletta, who writes the Annals of Communications column for the New Yorker, says he spent two-and-a-half years reporting this, his 11th book. Granted extensive access to the company’s founders and executives, he emerged with an account that neither idolizes nor demonizes the cash machine it has become.
“Making money is not a dirty goal; nor is it a philanthropic activity,” he writes. “Any company with Google’s power needs to be scrutinized.”
Yet he also “came away impatient with companies that spend too much time whining about Google and too little time devising an offense.” Most established media companies, he says, “were inexcusably slow to wake to the digital disruption.”
It’s hard not to bellyache about an opponent who piggybacks on your content. Google vacuums up more than US$20 billion a year in revenue — 97 percent of it from advertising — even as newspaper circulation slides, network television viewing erodes, and movie studios and book publishers look besieged.
Much of the material in Googled will be familiar to investors who’ve tracked the company’s ascent. For those less familiar with the story, Auletta traces the full arc — from the days when Brin and Larry Page hogged Stanford University’s computer system while creating the engine they originally called BackRub to Google’s initial public offering in 2004, which produced more than 900 Google millionaires, including the company’s first masseuse, he writes.
The IPO also marked the moment when content producers learned how much money the upstart was making at their expense.
“The evidence was now visible that Google was attracting more Internet advertising than anyone else, and these dollars were being siphoned from traditional media,” we read.
Auletta makes the case that Google’s clashes with media companies and advocates of privacy protection often reflect the mindset of its engineers: “They naively believe that most mysteries, including the mysteries of human behavior, are unlocked with data,” he says.
Many media executives quoted here question that. One is Tom Curley, chief executive officer of the Associated Press, which claimed Google was commoditizing AP content and demanded a license agreement, Auletta says.
“No, there is nothing naive about these guys,” Curley tells Auletta. “They are taking everybody else’s work and they are figuring out how to do a deal with most other people in which heads, they win, and tails, most everyone else loses.”
Yet “old media” can’t blame Google alone for the digital devastation, Auletta reminds us. Craig Newmark, for one, didn’t set out to swamp newspapers when he started craigslist.org, a site where people post job openings, apartments for rent, goods for sale and more. Only later was it clear how this ate into newspapers’ classified sections, which generated about a third of their advertising revenue, Auletta says.
The author works hard — sometimes too hard — to tell both sides of the story, making a vital contribution to the debate as Google continues to expand into other media, from books to telephones. There’s Google News, Google Earth, Google Maps, Google Videos, Google Docs — the list goes on and on.
Auletta also offers a tip to anyone eager to protect his or her privacy: You can “opt out” of allowing Google advertising cookies to track you by clicking on the word “Privacy” at the bottom of the engine’s home page and following the instructions.
I did so immediately. There will be no Google Me.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s