Comrades will not be popular in Beijing. It's a world history of communism written almost throughout in the past tense.
The picture this book paints is the familiar one. Although it had medieval and later antecedents, modern communism essentially arose from the writings of one man, Karl Marx. It was attempted as a practical arrangement in the Paris Commune of 1871 but was quickly and brutally put down by force of arms. It took over its first nation with the Russian Revolution of 1917 and thereafter became the source of fierce partisan dispute, for and against, throughout Europe. This led to the rise of fascism which claimed to be the only philosophy capable of stopping it, but nonetheless shared some, though by no means all, of its characteristics.
This clash led to World War II, after which half of Europe was forced into the communist mold by virtue of Russian conquest. Then came the fall of China to a communist-led peasant revolt and the partial spread of the belief-system among Southeast Asian countries anxious to shake off the yoke of European colonialism.
Of course there is far more to this book than that. There were terrible wars, notably in Vietnam, and independence struggles in South America and Africa that looked to communism as an ideology to give them a lead.
But the essential point remains -- all of this took place, if the truth be told, in the past. The only significant remaining Marxists in the Western world (which can be taken to include the capitalist economies of Asia such as Taiwan and Japan) are in the literature departments of universities. Poor literature! Poor universities!
On Asia, the book concludes that communism will collapse here as certainly as it did elsewhere. Even today, China has replaced the former creed with a rampant nationalism which, he thinks, poses a serious threat to Taiwan. North Korea is described as brutal, belligerent [and] economically desperate, Vietnam as still steeped in sterile communist academic debates, despite having opened itself up to international tourism.
The author's view of communism in general is that it is, in effect, a religion, with the characteristics of a founder whose words are taken as sacred, prophets, a hierarchical organization, and so on. We even see Karl Marx living with his family in his cramped London apartment, a modern reincarnation, you might think, of Jesus Christ lying in his humble manger.
But compared to other religions, this has been a singularly short-lived one, flourishing for approximately a century and now, though at its peak it dominated the lives of just over half the human race, in the last stages of irreversible decline. The conditions attendant on its early success, those typifying peasant societies that had quickly become industrialized, are unlikely to be duplicated nowadays, the author concludes. Traditional religions have made a come-back, and consumerism, for better or worse, is likely to continue to extend its appeal.
The two long chapters on China are at the heart of the book. Among Harvey's main points are, first, that Mao Zedong (
Harvey's strongest sympathies are with Deng Xiaoping (
Harvey claims that, despite the vast literature on his subject, no other all-inclusive survey such as this book exists. Perhaps other political writers judged it was too soon for a comprehensive overview of communism from its rise to its final fall.
This is a workmanlike book, packed with facts and is strongly anti-communist. The author is a noted British right-wing columnist and legislator who has equally little tolerance for Marxism's jargon or its ideology -- and a vivid sense of the enormous suffering caused by the global upheaval in the century of the movement's most virulent manifestation.
June 9 to June 15 A photo of two men riding trendy high-wheel Penny-Farthing bicycles past a Qing Dynasty gate aptly captures the essence of Taipei in 1897 — a newly colonized city on the cusp of great change. The Japanese began making significant modifications to the cityscape in 1899, tearing down Qing-era structures, widening boulevards and installing Western-style infrastructure and buildings. The photographer, Minosuke Imamura, only spent a year in Taiwan as a cartographer for the governor-general’s office, but he left behind a treasure trove of 130 images showing life at the onset of Japanese rule, spanning July 1897 to
One of the most important gripes that Taiwanese have about the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is that it has failed to deliver concretely on higher wages, housing prices and other bread-and-butter issues. The parallel complaint is that the DPP cares only about glamor issues, such as removing markers of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) colonialism by renaming them, or what the KMT codes as “de-Sinification.” Once again, as a critical election looms, the DPP is presenting evidence for that charge. The KMT was quick to jump on the recent proposal of the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) to rename roads that symbolize
On the evening of June 1, Control Yuan Secretary-General Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) apologized and resigned in disgrace. His crime was instructing his driver to use a Control Yuan vehicle to transport his dog to a pet grooming salon. The Control Yuan is the government branch that investigates, audits and impeaches government officials for, among other things, misuse of government funds, so his misuse of a government vehicle was highly inappropriate. If this story were told to anyone living in the golden era of swaggering gangsters, flashy nouveau riche businessmen, and corrupt “black gold” politics of the 1980s and 1990s, they would have laughed.
In an interview posted online by United Daily News (UDN) on May 26, current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was asked about Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) replacing him as party chair. Though not yet officially running, by the customs of Taiwan politics, Lu has been signalling she is both running for party chair and to be the party’s 2028 presidential candidate. She told an international media outlet that she was considering a run. She also gave a speech in Keelung on national priorities and foreign affairs. For details, see the May 23 edition of this column,