Comrades will not be popular in Beijing. It's a world history of communism written almost throughout in the past tense.
The picture this book paints is the familiar one. Although it had medieval and later antecedents, modern communism essentially arose from the writings of one man, Karl Marx. It was attempted as a practical arrangement in the Paris Commune of 1871 but was quickly and brutally put down by force of arms. It took over its first nation with the Russian Revolution of 1917 and thereafter became the source of fierce partisan dispute, for and against, throughout Europe. This led to the rise of fascism which claimed to be the only philosophy capable of stopping it, but nonetheless shared some, though by no means all, of its characteristics.
This clash led to World War II, after which half of Europe was forced into the communist mold by virtue of Russian conquest. Then came the fall of China to a communist-led peasant revolt and the partial spread of the belief-system among Southeast Asian countries anxious to shake off the yoke of European colonialism.
Of course there is far more to this book than that. There were terrible wars, notably in Vietnam, and independence struggles in South America and Africa that looked to communism as an ideology to give them a lead.
But the essential point remains -- all of this took place, if the truth be told, in the past. The only significant remaining Marxists in the Western world (which can be taken to include the capitalist economies of Asia such as Taiwan and Japan) are in the literature departments of universities. Poor literature! Poor universities!
On Asia, the book concludes that communism will collapse here as certainly as it did elsewhere. Even today, China has replaced the former creed with a rampant nationalism which, he thinks, poses a serious threat to Taiwan. North Korea is described as brutal, belligerent [and] economically desperate, Vietnam as still steeped in sterile communist academic debates, despite having opened itself up to international tourism.
The author's view of communism in general is that it is, in effect, a religion, with the characteristics of a founder whose words are taken as sacred, prophets, a hierarchical organization, and so on. We even see Karl Marx living with his family in his cramped London apartment, a modern reincarnation, you might think, of Jesus Christ lying in his humble manger.
But compared to other religions, this has been a singularly short-lived one, flourishing for approximately a century and now, though at its peak it dominated the lives of just over half the human race, in the last stages of irreversible decline. The conditions attendant on its early success, those typifying peasant societies that had quickly become industrialized, are unlikely to be duplicated nowadays, the author concludes. Traditional religions have made a come-back, and consumerism, for better or worse, is likely to continue to extend its appeal.
The two long chapters on China are at the heart of the book. Among Harvey's main points are, first, that Mao Zedong (
Harvey's strongest sympathies are with Deng Xiaoping (
Harvey claims that, despite the vast literature on his subject, no other all-inclusive survey such as this book exists. Perhaps other political writers judged it was too soon for a comprehensive overview of communism from its rise to its final fall.
This is a workmanlike book, packed with facts and is strongly anti-communist. The author is a noted British right-wing columnist and legislator who has equally little tolerance for Marxism's jargon or its ideology -- and a vivid sense of the enormous suffering caused by the global upheaval in the century of the movement's most virulent manifestation.
May 18 to May 24 Pastor Yang Hsu’s (楊煦) congregation was shocked upon seeing the land he chose to build his orphanage. It was surrounded by mountains on three sides, and the only way to access it was to cross a river by foot. The soil was poor due to runoff, and large rocks strewn across the plot prevented much from growing. In addition, there was no running water or electricity. But it was all Yang could afford. He and his Indigenous Atayal wife Lin Feng-ying (林鳳英) had already been caring for 24 orphans in their home, and they were in
On May 2, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), at a meeting in support of Taipei city councilors at party headquarters, compared President William Lai (賴清德) to Hitler. Chu claimed that unlike any other democracy worldwide in history, no other leader was rooting out opposing parties like Lai and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). That his statements are wildly inaccurate was not the point. It was a rallying cry, not a history lesson. This was intentional to provoke the international diplomatic community into a response, which was promptly provided. Both the German and Israeli offices issued statements on Facebook
Even by the standards of Ukraine’s International Legion, which comprises volunteers from over 55 countries, Han has an unusual backstory. Born in Taichung, he grew up in Costa Rica — then one of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies — where a relative worked for the embassy. After attending an American international high school in San Jose, Costa Rica’s capital, Han — who prefers to use only his given name for OPSEC (operations security) reasons — moved to the US in his teens. He attended Penn State University before returning to Taiwan to work in the semiconductor industry in Kaohsiung, where he
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by