The Democratic Progressive Party’s policy of making Taiwan into a “nuclear-free homeland” by 2025 has been controversial from the outset. Opponents and proponents of nuclear energy never stop arguing about it.
Comments on news Web sites show that supporters often dismiss wind and solar energies as not worth developing, and quote this as a reason for supporting nuclear power, but this kind of zero-sum mindset will not help Taiwan achieve the goal of energy diversity.
Fourth-generation nuclear reactors are far more advanced than those in commercial operation in many ways, including passive safety and nuclear-waste processing. This technology allows development toward smaller scales and modularization, which greatly reduce the risk of major nuclear accidents and create the potential for dispersed electricity generation that would allow nuclear power to thrive alongside renewable sources of energy.
Unfortunately, the worldwide tide against nuclear power after the 2011 accident at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant has set fourth-generation nuclear energy far back from ever going into commercial operation.
The Volkswagen diesel emissions falsification scandal of 2015 led to a sea change in the global automobile industry. In the four years since then, electric vehicles have become the sole creed of automobile bosses and investors.
Vehicle manufacturers’ limited budgets are now entirely devoted to developing electric motor technology, as each company fears that it will not have a place in the race. Many combustion engine experts have woken up to find that they suddenly have nothing to do. Some have found themselves sidelined and others have lost their jobs. It is a story that probably sounds all too familiar to nuclear power engineers.
The tide of electrification is unstoppable. There is also no doubt that vehicles with electric motors are more suitable for cities than those with combustion engines.
However, does this mean that engines are an outmoded technology that should be eliminated? Clearly not, because there are plenty of other transport applications that are not suited to complete electrification, and because there is still plenty of room for progress with respect to engines and the fuel they use.
By the same token, nuclear power technology might eventually make a comeback, but that is not a good reason to disparage wind and solar energies. The demand for highly electrified transport means that electricity consumption will continue to climb. How, then, can people who only support either nuclear or renewable energy guarantee that their preferred option alone will be enough to meet future challenges?
Considering engineering and safety, the life of Taiwan’s aging nuclear power plants should not be prolonged any further. There is also no chance that work on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Gongliao District (貢寮) will ever be restarted. Existing nuclear power technology is really not suitable for such a densely populated place as Taiwan, so at the present stage, people must go all-out to develop renewable energies.
If the idea of using nuclear energy to nurture green energy does not work, why not try using green energy to nurture nuclear energy? Hopefully, the government after 2025 will continue to pay close attention to developments in nuclear power technology.
It is never a good idea to put all your eggs in one basket. Maintaining a diverse range of technologies and sources of energy can only be good for Taiwan’s energy security and development.
Pu Yi-hao is an automotive engineer in the UK.
Translated by Julian Clegg
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS