Environmentalists in France and Ireland are pushing forward with legal cases aimed at forcing their governments to step up action on climate change, motivated by a flagship ruling last year that the Netherlands must cut emissions faster to keep its people safe.
In October, a Dutch appeals court said the government had “done too little to prevent the dangers of climate change and is doing too little to catch up,” ordering it to ensure planet-warming emissions are at least 25 percent below 1990 levels by the end of next year.
Tessa Khan, a lawyer with the Urgenda Foundation, which brought the Dutch case on behalf of nearly 900 citizens, said this and other ongoing climate legal actions are based on the principle that governments must meet their obligations under human rights law and the 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change.
“[These cases] all spring from the same sort of inspiration and the broad notion that our governments have the duty to protect us from threats of this scale that they have contributed to knowingly,” said Khan, codirector of the Climate Litigation Network.
Four non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in France, including Greenpeace and Oxfam, fired the starting gun on Dec. 17. They sent a “preliminary request for compensation” in a 41-page letter to the French prime minister and a dozen government ministers, denouncing the state for failing to take concrete and effective measures to combat climate change.
The government has two months to respond, and if it fails to give a satisfactory answer, the groups are preparing to file a full legal action with the Paris Administrative Court in March.
Oxfam France climate and energy advocacy manager Armelle Le Comte said the ripple of lawsuits on climate action around the world — from Europe and North America to Pakistan and Colombia — reflected growing urgency as the impacts of extreme weather and rising seas become more visible.
Governments, including France, have talked a lot about tackling climate change, but have not done enough in practice, she said.
“So I think it is not surprising that more citizens, charities and NGOs ... decide that legal action is maybe the answer,” she said.
In the meantime, the NGOs have been raising awareness about the case and the need for stronger climate action in France through a YouTube video featuring celebrities such as actress Juliette Binoche and writer and film director Cyril Dion. They also launched an online petition in support of what they are calling the “Case of the Century” that has garnered nearly 2.1 million signatures in about a month.
Le Comte said wide public support for the legal action was important in providing a sense of legitimacy to the approach.
The case is particularly poignant in France, which has been rocked in recent months by “yellow vest” protests over social inequality and the high cost of living that were initially sparked by planned hikes in fuel tax.
French President Emmanuel Macron last week launched a national policy debate that includes how the country could shift to using more clean energy.
Khan said the court cases were aimed at ensuring emissions targets are met, not telling states how to do it.
“Then it’s up to the governments and the public to make sure the policies that are put in place are ones that ensure a just [energy] transition and ... the poorest aren’t the ones who bear the burden of that transition,” she said.
Le Comte said the “Case of the Century” social media campaign was meant to provide more information, especially to young people, on the measures that could be taken.
In Ireland, backers of the climate change case, which was scheduled to begin in the High Court on Tuesday, organized a children’s rally in Dublin for Saturday last week to urge leaders that “2019 must be the year of ambitious climate action.”
About 12,600 members of the public have backed “Climate Case Ireland” with online messages of support and spokeswoman Sadhbh O Neill said awareness was growing in the country, which has among the highest emissions per capita in the EU.
“That helps us show the court that we have standing, that we’re not doing it in a self-interested way and that we are trying to be representative of concerned citizens,” she said.
Friends of the Irish Environment, a company set up by environmental activists, are to argue in the case that the government’s approval of the National Mitigation Plan in 2017 violated national legislation on climate action, as well as its constitution and human rights obligations. The company will also claim the plan falls far short of the steps required by the Paris Agreement.
O Neill said Ireland’s emissions have risen since 2014, as its economy recovered from the 2008 financial crisis, and its dairy industry expanded.
A spokesman for Ireland’s Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment said by e-mail that the government would defend the case, but added that the National Mitigation Plan recognized a detailed roadmap would be required to decarbonize the economy.
That is now being put in place, he added, and includes a government-wide climate action plan “intended to make Ireland a leader in responding to climate disruption.”
The verdict in the Irish case, a judicial review, is expected to be issued in a few months, while the French legal process could last two to three years, Le Comte said.
In the Netherlands, it took three years for an initial ruling to be confirmed by the appeals court, and the government said in November it would request a review of the judgement.
Khan said one key advantage of pursuing states in court was judicial scrutiny of the evidence on climate change.
“Just by putting the facts on the record — that in itself is a really important communication tool, and helps to mobilize the public around climate change,” she said.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from