During China’s greatest period of economic growth, fed by widespread industrialization that lifted millions out of poverty, inequality has also increased — at the fastest pace and to the highest level in the world.
It might get worse.
China’s Gini coefficient, a widely used measure of income dispersion across a population, has risen more steeply over the past decade than in any other country, according to an IMF working paper.
Illustration: Mountain People
Some inequality is to be expected with industrialization, but in China, it has happened at a staggering pace.
One of the main drivers is growing differences in education levels and skill premiums, the research found.
In education, China is among the most unequal societies. Demand for highly skilled workers soared with rapid technological change.
Access to secondary and higher-level education has blossomed since 1980. Last year, about 8 million students graduated from Chinese universities, 10 times more than two decades ago and double the number at US universities.
However, the gap in tertiary education completion rose even more, comparing rural with urban areas and richer to poorer people.
For example, in the relatively deprived southern autonomous region of Guangxi, about 19 percent of the college-age population is enrolled in tertiary education. In Shanghai, the comparable figure is 70 percent.
China’s capital-accumulation boom has been backed by state subsidies that encourage technological advances. Many research and development (R&D) handouts are based, in turn, on employees’ educational qualifications.
Take the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology’s Innovation Company program, for example. Access to its incentives include stipulations that R&D spending amount to 6 percent of sales for companies with less than 50 million yuan (US$7.27 million) in revenue; that at least 30 percent of employees have a college degree; and that 10 percent of the staff be involved in R&D.
Plenty of big names have taken advantage of such policies, including the likes of Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co, the surveillance giant.
Other measures to bring home so-called sea turtles — qualified Chinese living overseas — have deepened the divide.
Under Beijing’s Thousand Talents program, which was launched a decade ago, returnees can get a 2 million yuan research grant and a personal reward of more than 500,000 yuan, along with benefits.
As of November last year, that program had attracted more than 7,000 Chinese scientists and engineers. Local governments, including Shenzhen, also have housing policies aimed at luring talent.
On top of the influx of expertise, it is harder for people to find good jobs as the population generally becomes better-educated.
To be sure, inequality does diminish as workers change industries, for example from agriculture to sectors that add more value, but that has not happened as fast, in part because of pro-farmer policies and the dibao system that guarantees rural incomes.
Beijing is now trying to reduce the income-tax burden, adding a potentially powerful tool to address inequality.
The working paper’s authors say this is especially the case in China, given the “limited role” fiscal policy has played in “moderating income inequality in China to date.”
For example, under tax reforms announced last month by the Chinese Ministry of Finance, the greatest benefit accrues to about 20 million people who earn more than 100,000 yuan a year — just 3 percent of the total workforce — according to a Bernstein analysis.
With a higher percentage of salary earners in Tier 1 and 2 cities, the gains there will be disproportionate.
The government also plans to introduce a household allowance for children’s and higher education next year. Spending on education, culture and recreation accounts for 11 percent of household consumption in China.
Urbanization and an aging population no doubt have added to inequality.
By 2008, China had slowed the growth of inequality from previous decades, but since then, the government has started running out of measures and now faces the challenge of deleveraging its financial system as the economy slows.
As a trade war worsens and Beijing pushes its technological edge, the balancing act will get tougher.
Alongside income-tax breaks, the government also announced more stringent social-security collection from companies to fund pensions.
In an ideal world, Beijing would balance the books sufficiently to slash taxes for the poorest people, but for funding, it is having to turn to the very companies that are supposed to drive the “Made in China 2025” program, reducing their effectiveness.
The latest change in social-security collection could cut machinery, industrial and telecoms’ net profits by 11 percent to 15 percent, according to CLSA.
The IMF paper suggested that the most effective policies to reduce inequality are those “with the largest effect coming from social-protection spending and redistribution” of income.
However, as Beijing’s push-and-pull gets tougher, the policy avenue will narrow.
As Thomas Piketty’s work has found, wealth accumulated in the past grows faster than output and wages. In doing so, “the past devours the future.”
Anjani Trivedi is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering industrial companies in Asia. She previously worked for the Wall Street Journal. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past