It was bizarre to hear government officials and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators criticize draft bills aimed at monitoring cross-strait negotiations that would penalize officials whose conduct during cross-strait talks damaged national sovereignty or territorial integrity — after all, the ultimate purpose of cross-strait negotiations is to defend the national interest.
On Friday, three bills aimed at supervising cross-strait talks and agreements were submitted by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) and Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) and the New Power Party (NPP) to the Internal Administration Committee for further review.
However, Yu and the NPP’s proposals immediately drew fire from government officials and KMT lawmakers for provisions that would see punishment imposed on officials who violate the nation’s sovereignty.
Premier Simon Chang (張善政) said the proposal would treat officials involved in cross-strait negotiations as suspects in a criminal investigation, while Mainland Affairs Council Minister Andrew Hsiao (夏立言) said that negotiations should be based on give-and-take, and if negotiators can be penalized for conceding too much, no one would dare to sit at the table.
Why is it so wrong to insist that negotiators defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity during international — or cross-strait — talks?
All negotiations are about the art of give-and-take, but no one would consider it reasonable for a nation to give up its sovereignty or territory in exchange for what are mostly commercial and trade interests.
The fifth negotiation on fisheries between Taiwan and Japan ended on Friday, and one of the issues under discussion was whether Taiwanese fishing vessels would be allowed to operate in waters around the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), as the islands are under the de facto control of Japan, but both countries claim sovereignty over them.
The two nations worked out a practical agreement to put the sovereignty issue aside and allow fishing vessels from both countries to enter the area.
If Japan had insisted on its sovereignty over the islands as a precondition for allowing Taiwanese fishing vessels into the area, would Taiwanese negotiators have considered it reasonable to concede?
It is unlikely.
In fact, holding negotiators responsible for damaging national sovereignty or territory is nothing new, as Article 104 of the Criminal Code states: “Any person colluding with a foreign state or its agent with intent to subject territory of the Republic of China to such state or other state shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.”
Do the premier or the Mainland Affairs Council minister also believe that the Criminal Code treats negotiators like suspects and worry that no one would dare to sit at the negotiating table because of it?
If it is not a problem for the Criminal Code to regulate people taking part in international negotiations, why would it be a problem to impose the same legal responsibility on negotiators in cross-strait talks, especially when China is so far the only nation that has repeatedly and openly expressed its territorial ambitions toward Taiwan — or the Republic of China if the government prefers this name?
Certainly, details, such as what constitutes damage to national sovereignty and territorial integrity, could be further discussed and better defined, but it is frightening to know that government officials think it is unnecessary to hold negotiators in cross-strait talks responsible for sovereignty and territorial integrity.
It is even scarier to hear officials say that their hands would be tied with such regulations, since negotiations are about give-and-take.
One might begin to wonder what they are prepared to give away when negotiating with China.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past