There is a direct link between urbanization and increased food consumption and obesity issues in China, and it has become a growing epidemic. Doctor Xu Zhangrong (許樟榮), deputy secretary of the China Diabetes Society has said that “the sudden rise of diabetes in China isn’t only a health threat, but an economic one. It could bankrupt the country’s healthcare system. China needs to shift its focus from treating diabetes to preventing it.” Within one generation, the percentage of Chinese children who are overweight or obese has skyrocketed from 5 percent to 20 percent. The rate has absolutely exploded over a very limited amount of time.
Why is this happening? The main cause is an increasingly sedentary lifestyle, combined with the introduction of highly processed fast food and the adoption of western aspirations.
The one-child policy meant that a whole generation of children grew up as the only child, doted on by their two parents and four grandparents, which meant they had a large say in dictating what the household purchased. The problem is compounded by the fact that this generation of parents grew up not having a lot. I remember my mother telling me stories of her youth — that they were so poor that they only ate a portion of pork once every few months.
Illustration: Yusha
Now, it is not uncommon for Chinese households to have two or three investment properties. Within a generation you have people who have accumulated a lot of wealth, which of course they want to give to their kids. They want to give them everything they never had, so if their kids want McDonald’s, if they can afford it, why should they not? It is a sign of affection. And Chinese people love showing their affection with food.
However, it was the introduction of western aspirations and fast food that allowed the habits to take such a sharp turn. Kentucky Fried Chicken is the No. 1 food chain in China and there are also a lot of Chinese chains that are unhealthy as well. The flavors are intensifying and everything has to be amplified, which means more salt, more sugar and more fat in everyone’s diet.
‘ACUPUNCTURE POINTS’
The idea for our A New Way to Eat project was developed by the Joint US-China Collaboration on Clean Energy (JUCCCE), which looks for “acupuncture points” to accelerate the greening of China. We realized that food is a great way to engage people on the issue of sustainability. Our food system is the single largest driver of greenhouse gas emissions and we realized that food is a big part of Chinese culture, so it is a great way to engage people on the issue of sustainability and communicate messages about personal and planetary well-being.
A New Way to Eat is a behavioral change program. The concept is to take complex subjects like sustainability, biodiversity and micronutrients and translate them into a language that kids can understand and relate to. For instance, one of the catchy themes we have developed is “eat a rainbow every day,” because if you eat a variety of colors every day, you are getting all the micronutrients you need. In order to make it memorable for kids, we have created theme songs (in Chinese and English), activity sheets, discussion questions and visually stimulating flash cards. We even dress up in “food heroes” costumes. We paint, we draw, we make them run around and get active, and get them engaged with healthy eating.
We specifically target young urban kids, because they are the emerging middle class. It is much easier to instill healthy habits when children are young rather than trying to change entrenched unhealthy habits when in young adults.
The program is based on “playducation,” which is a different and innovative approach to the current education system here. Basically, you have the teacher at the front, talking for the entire length of the class — it is fairly didactic. Therefore, our classes have been exceptionally well received — kids love it. We have had parents tell us they catch the kids singing the jingles even a week after class, which shows us our approach works.
We are currently piloting our program with a few schools and hope to roll out the program nationwide and make our content open source to all schools within China in the next three to four years.
Also, we are working with school cafeterias and local chefs to reframe their recipes, so that whatever the kids learn in class they see on a plate at lunch. We promote a lot of leafy greens for calcium, beans and legumes and tofu for protein — China has hundreds of varieties of tofu.
MISCONCEPTIONS
We have faced some challenges with parents’ entrenched misconceptions about how much milk or meat their kids should be consuming. We cannot tell them they are wrong, so we have to try and work around this and hopefully they will come to their own realization in time.
A lot of parents also say: “We’re not vegetarians, we can’t not eat meat.” The conversations become fairly polarized — you either eat meat or you do not. So we talk more about being smarter consumers, finding a medium ground. We are not saying do not eat meat, just be smarter about how you are consuming meat.
Instead of eating a steak, you can eat three meals of stir-fry dishes that use the same amount of meat. Funny enough, these are more traditional Chinese dishes, and they just so happen to be better for you and the planet as well.
The other side of the coin is the food industry we are competing with. They have such marketing power. A lot of people, especially young kids, are being bombarded with messages about unhealthy food. And it is clearly working, just look at this generation’s obesity rate. Our communities need to learn that healthy and balanced eating is good for us and good for the planet.
(As told to Anna Leach.)
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then