The political approach of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has traditionally been one of style over substance. Nonetheless, when Ma prepared to give his first inaugural speech in 2008, he could not have asked for a better setting for change. He had won with a handsome 58.45 percent of the vote and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) controlled approximately 75 percent of the 113-seat Legislative Yuan. If he had a desire for substance, change and direction, it was a time to show it. He could be bold in his vision, plans and statements, for he had, in the minds of most, a clear mandate.
Ma did state goals, but unfortunately the desired substance was not forthcoming. For a while he had what could be called a mandate; his problem was that both he and his advisers misinterpreted and misread what exactly that mandate was for. So now, four years later, as he prepares to give his second inaugural address, times have changed and the setting is reversed.
Style will always only go so far, especially at a national level, and in the past four years Ma’s time and style appear to have run their course. As Abraham Lincoln put it: “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.” Here lies Ma’s dilemma.
As Ma faces his 2012 inauguration, dissatisfaction reigns. He has run out of ways of “fooling even some of the people some of the time.” There is no mandate this time, but rather questions and doubts. Ma won, but by little more than 1 percent. The KMT still holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, but it lost crucial seats in the election. The People First Party, a traditional ally in the past, is no longer onboard and has joined the opposition in voting against him on several issues. Further, even members of his own party have criticized both him and his Cabinet for their lack of communication.
Still, it gets worse. Ma’s public approval rating in one recent poll had dropped to 19.5 percent and those polled stated that if an election were held now, they would support the opposition candidate and not Ma. Numerous protests are being planned for both the day of Ma’s inauguration on May 20 and the day preceding it. The Taiwan Solidarity Union has even proposed televising Ma’s inaugural speech on a large screen in Huashan 1914 Creative Park where the party will hand out symbolic eggs that viewers can throw at the president as he speaks.
So what will Ma say? He will need more than the traditional platitudes. We do not know what topics he will address, but we can suggest topics that he should avoid.
With a flagging economy, and after the debacle of his “6-3-3” promises, to invoke his recent campaign slogan of an upcoming “golden decade” would appear close to political suicide. Having seen a steady decline in income and economic performance, it is unlikely that the public will believe any more promises that prosperity lies just around the corner.
Similarly, Ma needs to be conscious of the growing sense of Taiwanese identity. In his first inaugural address, he stressed what could be viewed as veiled attempts to Sinicize Taiwan. No doubt, reflecting his views that the Republic of China has a legitimate claim to continental China vis-a-vis its outdated 1947 Constitution, Ma constantly spoke of peace and his vision of Taiwan’s Zhonghua Minzu (中華民族). Today, however, more and more people are thinking in terms of a Taiwan Minzu, a phrase that Ma would have difficulty saying.
Then there is the matter of US beef imports. Though it appears that Ma will continue to try to force this issue on the people, accepting meat from the US with the livestock growth-boosting additive ractopamine is hardly a topic for an inaugural address and it is certainly not a flag to rally the troops behind.
What about Taiwan’s military readiness? This too is unlikely. His party has in effect repeatedly scuppered all attempts at purchasing the necessary military hardware to defend the country. What topics are left? Preaching austerity and belt-tightening may be the most practical given Taiwan’s present circumstances, but would Ma have any credibility left in this matter?
Whatever way one looks at it, Ma’s second inaugural address is one that will be crucial in setting the tone for his next four years and it will be closely watched. He has no honeymoon period this time; he has lost too much credibility. Style will not be of much use under these present circumstances. If he had anything of political substance and vision in his bag of tricks, now would be the time to show it.
Jerome Keating is a commentator in Taipei.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS