By Yuriko Koike
Kokka no Hinkaku, The Dignity of a State, is the title of a recent book by the Japanese mathematician Masahiko Fujiwara that has sold 3 million copies. Talk about the book in Japan is so fervid that the term hinkaku, “dignity,” has become a buzzword.
That Japan’s dignity is now a central issue should surprise no one. For this is a moment when Japan must chart its course — either decline or dignity — as a state in relation to its giant neighbor, China.
The issue of relations with China crystallized last month, when the Japanese Coast Guard arrested the captain of a Chinese trawler after his ship hit two Japanese patrol boats near the Senkaku Islands, which Japan considers within its territorial waters. Tension between Japan and China — which also claims the islands — immediately soared.
For many years, Japanese governments have taken a “let sleeping dogs lie” approach to territorial disputes over the islands, ignoring repeated provocations by China (and Taiwan). However, that ended with the election in September last year, which ushered in the pro-China administration of then-Japanese prime minister Yukio Hatoyama.
Hatoyama was naive enough to declare publicly his intention of turning the East China Sea into a Chinese-led “Sea of Fraternity.” He also earned the distrust of the US, Japan’s most important ally, by advocating the relocation outside Japan of a US air base in Okinawa.
Diplomatic realism was not restored after Hatoyama’s fall from power earlier this year. Instead, his successor, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan, continues to believe that Japan can somehow opt out of history and a turbulent region.
Speaking at the UN plenary meeting last month, Kan said that his government seeks to achieve a “society in which human suffering is reduced a minimum.”
National security is treated as a low-grade issue.
Meanwhile, China is following its own definition of “dignity,” which looks to almost everyone in Asia — other than Kan’s government — like a right to dominate. Indeed, China no longer even tries to hide its desire for hegemony in the Pacific.
China appears to have seen the standoff over the Senkaku Islands as a test of wills — a test Kan’s government failed abysmally. In retaliation for Japan’s refusal to release the trawler captain, China hinted that it might recall its ambassador from Tokyo, suspended bilateral ministerial-level exchanges and canceled a tour to Japan for about 10,000 Chinese.
More ominously, the Chinese arrested four employees of Fujita, a Japanese construction company, on suspicion of espionage. The four were in China for a project commissioned by the Japanese government to dispose of chemical weapons abandoned by the Japanese military after World War II. Chinese officials also suggested the possibility of banning exports to Japan of rare-earth elements — raw materials crucial for many Japanese manufacturing processes — and appear to have done so informally.
Inexperienced and diplomatically inept, Kan’s administration buckled, releasing the trawler captain early. His government then sought to pin the blame on the local prosecutor who had formally arrested the captain. This display of weak-kneed diplomacy appalled many Japanese and popular support for Kan’s administration has plummeted.
The de facto export ban on rare-earth elements — often referred to as “industrial vitamins” — struck a terrible blow to Japanese companies, which rely on China for 97 percent of their supply. Among a variety of rare-earth elements, neodymium and dysprosium are widely used as a magnetic material for motors in environmentally friendly vehicles and home appliances, while erbium is used as a dopant in optical fibers and cerium as an abrasive for polishing LCD glass.
The “rare-earth threat” is not confined to Japan, as China accounts for over 90 percent of the world’s production, roughly 120,000 tonnes. However, this should nt be a threat at all, because the world has ample reserves of these elements. Indeed, rare-earth elements are “rare” only in the sense that they are distributed in small quantities and must be extracted from ores, a time-consuming process. Rare-earth mines are found throughout the world. China dominates the global market simply because it has fairly abundant rare-earth ores close to the surface.
Of course, China also has abundant cheap labor to process ore. Rare-earth ores in southern China — all except for those in Inner Mongolia — contain radioactive substances that pose significant threats to human health and the environment. Other countries might worry about the health risk to workers in rare-earth processing, but that does not appear to be true of China.
In the face of aggressive price cutting by Chinese rare-earth producers, many mines in the US and elsewhere in the world were shut down over the years. Even before the trawler incident, China was trying to regulate rare-earths, defining them as a strategic resource. Chinese officials say that concern over the overexploitation and illicit export of rare earths prompted them to regulate the industry more closely. However, this regulation, when combined with China’s aggressive pricing, suggests a desire to assert monopoly control, and the de facto ban of rare-earth exports to Japan looks like an effort to test the benefits of this looming monopoly.
China’s move, however, put the rest of the world on alert. Many countries are now planning to develop their own or alternative sources of rare-earth elements and to accelerate efforts to develop technologies that are free of them.
However, China has another motive for tightening the noose on rare-earth exports: It wants to force high-tech firms to operate in China, so that local companies can absorb their technologies. A senior official of a Chinese company has said that, even though rare-earth exports have been restricted, Japanese companies can secure their supply by launching operations in China.
If there is a response to such blackmail that could preserve Japan’s dignity, the Kan government is unlikely to find it.
Yuriko Koike, former Japanese minister of defense and national security adviser, is now chairman of the executive council of the Liberal Democratic Party.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past