The results of the special municipality elections in November will have significant implications for the future of Taiwan, and recent events have given much cause for concern.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has already announced its candidates, and in the process left Kaohsiung County Commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興) and Tainan Mayor Hsu Tain-tsair (許添財) out in the cold. Perhaps feeling snubbed, the two men announced they werer considering running as independents. Sensing blood, the pro-China media and pan-blue camp have had a field day, trying to exploit internal divisions within the DPP for their own electoral benefit.
On Monday last week, the Southern Taiwan Society (STS) decided to hold a press conference at which it called on both Hsu and Yang to clarify what they intended to do during the campaign. To avoid embarrassment or any unwanted surprises, the authors of this open letter accompanied the former and current chairmen of the STS, Cheng Cheng-iok (鄭正煜) and Han Ming-jung (韓明榮), to discuss the matter with Yang.
The county commissioner had a lot to say for himself and made clear that he would need time to talk to his supporters because his decision was bound to disappoint them. In the end, however, he said he would do what the people of Taiwan expected of him and not stand.
For our part, we were keen to emphasize just how strategically important Kaohsiung and Tainan are, being two major cities in the south.
We conceded that Yang had legitimate reasons to feel disappointed at failing to secure the party nomination, but impressed on him the need to see the bigger picture. We pointed out how important it was for a pro-localization party to be in power in Kaohsiung and encouraged him to play his part in seeing this come about.
We hope that those who received party nominations will treat their erstwhile opponents with the respect they deserve and recognize both their achievements and sacrifices while in office. We also hope that they will find it within themselves to reconcile with those who were not nominated with an appropriate degree of humility.
Only by securing the heartfelt support of those who lost in the party primaries can DPP candidates really focus their attention on their campaigns. We also call on the party center to understand the concerns of the losers’ supporters and to do everything possible to promote unity. Only then can we expect to do well in November and lay the foundation for the presidential elections in 2012.
This situation brings to mind the challenge faced by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) when he was trying to secure the support of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in his bid to be nominated its presidential candidate. At first, his nomination was obstructed, but he took the advice of Tsai Hung-wen (蔡鴻文), who reminded him of the importance of tolerance and inclusion. Lee visited each of the eight party leaders standing between him and the nomination and asked them, with due humility, for their support. In the end, he secured the nomination and became president, and went on to oversee a peaceful revolution.
One should not forget the latent strength to be found in humility.
Chang Yeh-shen is chairman of the Taiwan Hakka Society. Tsay Ting-kuei is a convener for the Taiwan Referendum Alliance. Chang Ming-yu is an executive member of the alliance. Wu Li-hui is director of the Union of Taiwanese Teachers.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing