The IMF recently revised upward global economic growth forecasts. This included an increase in the growth forecast for Taiwan to 7.7 adercent. The government was all over this news, using it as evidence that its promised “Golden Decade” was on the horizon. The pro-unification media also claimed the new figure meant that Taiwan’s economic growth rate was now higher than that of South Korea. They also said that this highlighted the poor record of the previous government. The problem is, this just isn’t true.
The seemingly healthy growth rate of 7.7 percent is the result of the economy bouncing back following a deep dip. If you look at it more closely, you see that Taiwan’s economic growth rate compares badly with that of South Korea or any of the other “Asian Tigers,” and we are not in as good a situation as one might expect from looking at the rate in isolation.
The truth of the matter is that, according to IMF statistics, Taiwan’s economic growth last year was minus 1.91 percent, South Korea’s was 0.2 percent and Singapore’s was 1.3 percent. IMF forecasts for this year forecast rates of 7.7 percent, 5.7 percent and 9.9 percent respectively.
At first glance, Taiwan seems to have done better than South Korea. However, if we look at 2008, the year the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) won the presidential election, as a base of 100, then the 7.7 percent increase to this year gives a new index of 105.64. This is marginally worse than a comparable index for South Korea, at 105.95, and much worse than Singapore’s 108.47.
In other words, this apparently miraculous growth rate is simply the result of rebounding from a deeper trough than these other countries. There is nothing miraculous about it. On the contrary, it is proof that Taiwan’s economy has been buffeted more by external factors than other countries. This is because Taiwan has put all its eggs in one basket, and become far to reliant on one market — China.
IMF analysts seem to be aware of this vulnerability, which is why they also predicted a growth rate of only 4.3 percent for next year, lower than the 5 percent forecast for South Korea, 4.9 percent for Singapore and 4.4 percent for Hong Kong. What the IMF figures show clearly is that Taiwan’s economy isn’t really experiencing anything out of the ordinary.
If free-trade with China is a panacea for all our economic problems as the pan-blue camp maintains, then why after two years of opening up, greater deregulation and closer ties, is Taiwan falling behind? Every time a new measure is announced people carp on about investors’ newfound interest in Taiwan, wax lyrical about how the salmon are returning upstream to their place of birth, bleat endlessly about the stock market index sailing past 10,000 points with 20,000 points on the horizon.
How many people are going to fall for such “irrational exuberance?” Will the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) mean that President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) so-called “6-3-3 policy” — annual GDP growth of 6 percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of less than 3 percent — actually work? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
At this stage, what we can say is that the IMF has rather more conservative expectations of the ECFA than some of its supporters in Taiwan. Otherwise, why would they have ranked us lower than the other Asian Tigers in their economic growth forecasts for next year?
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS