Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-hua (江宜樺) said recently that his ministry may implement a system for absentee voting in time for the special municipality elections in December. The proposal has met with a wave of criticism from the opposition.
Absentee voting is a good idea and a routine matter in many democracies. It guarantees the right to vote by assuring that voters are not deprived of the opportunity to do so simply because they work or live away from their voting district. As such, it is a sign of democratic progress. Previous Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administrations have considered implementing such a system, but never did so due to public sentiment.
It must be said, however, that if absentee voting is introduced without complementary measures, it could do more harm than good. Forcing through a decision could further intensify the standoff between the government and the opposition.
There are a number of concerns to consider. There is little trust between the government and the opposition. The lack of public debate on the issue also means that there is no consensus between the government, opposition and the public. If the ministry implements the system now — a time when the government is at its weakest position — the opposition will argue that the government is trying to use absentee voting to give it an advantage. Military, police, civil servants, teachers and businesspeople living in China — all traditionally seen as pan-blue supporters — constitute a large part of those who would benefit from absentee voting.
It remains unclear what voter groups the system would target. If it is targeted at people within Taiwan who live outside of their voting district and register beforehand, this can only be praised. If, however, the scope includes citizens abroad, the impact would be significant. This would lead the government to keep opening up toward China in hopes of wooing more votes from China-based Taiwanese businesspeople. At the same time, the Chinese government could influence how these businesspeople vote. If these businesspeople voted from China, election disputes could eventually affect political stability and intensify social polarization. The independence of Taiwan’s electoral system has yet to be firmly established.
In the past, military, civil servant and teacher organizations controlled voting by demanding that members vote for a certain candidate. There were reports of ballot manipulation or miscounts by electoral authorities. Introducing absentee voting too soon could lead to endless election disputes.
The attempt on then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) life in 2004 illustrated Taiwan’s susceptibility to election disputes. The military and police were put on a national security alert, and the pan-blue camp then said that the incident had been a plot to influence the vote, a claim that led to massive street demonstrations, with many refusing to accept the results of the election. Is Taiwan better prepared today to handle a severe election dispute, particularly in cases where poll results show a thin margin of victory?
The problem is not absentee voting in itself, but the lack of complementary measures and public information. Absentee voting will require more time for public debate and deliberation.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US